Breast magnetic resonance imaging use in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with less mastectomies in large ductal cancers but not in lobular cancers

Background To assess the impact of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) use on surgical outcome per histological breast cancer subtype in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and methods All patients aged 18–70 years who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage I–III invasive breast cancer in the Netherlands in the years 2011–2013 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients with cT4 tumours were excluded from the analysis. Use of breast MRI and impact on surgical treatment, resection margins and detection of contralateral breast cancer were analysed by multivariable analyses. Results Breast MRI was performed in 2879 (83.9%) out of 3433 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Younger age (odds ratio [OR] 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17–1.71 for 18–50 years compared with 50–70 years), larger tumour stage (OR 1.46 [95% CI 1.15–1.86] for cT3, compared to cT1–2 tumours) and multifocality (OR 1.30; 95% CI 1.04–1.61, versus unifocality) were associated with increased breast MRI use. In ductal breast cancer, after stratification for cT-status, breast MRI use is associated with a significant lower OR for mastectomy as final surgery in cT3 tumours (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21–0.99). Resection margin involvement and detection of contralateral breast cancer were not associated with breast MRI use. Conclusion In patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the use of breast MRI was associated with a reduced mastectomy rate, particularly in patients with large invasive ductal breast tumours but not in patients with lobular breast cancer

Extended adjuvant aromatase inhibition after sequential endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer:follow-up analysis of the randomised phase 3 DATA trial

Background: The DATA study evaluated the use of two different durations of anastrozole in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who were disease-free after 2–3 years of tamoxifen. We hereby present the follow-up analysis, which was performed after all patients reached a minimum follow-up of 10 years beyond treatment divergence. Methods: The open-label, randomised, phase 3 DATA study was performed in 79 hospitals in the Netherlands (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00301457). Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who were disease-free after 2–3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment were assigned to either 3 or 6 years of anastrozole (1 mg orally once a day). Randomisation (1:1) was stratified by hormone receptor status, nodal status, HER2 status, and prior tamoxifen duration. The primary outcome was adapted disease-free survival, defined as disease-free survival from 3 years after randomisation onwards. Adapted overall survival was assessed as a secondary outcome. Analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat design. Findings: Between June 28, 2006, and August 10, 2009, 1912 patients were randomly assigned to 3 years (n = 955) or 6 years (n = 957) of anastrozole. Of these, 1660 patients were eligible and disease-free at 3 years after randomisation. The 10-year adapted disease-free survival was 69.2% (95% CI 55.8–72.3) in the 6-year group (n = 827) and 66.0% (95% CI 62.5–69.2) in the 3-year group (n = 833) (hazard ratio (HR) 0.86; 95% CI 0.72–1.01; p = 0.073). The 10-year adapted overall survival was 80.9% (95% CI 77.9–83.5) in the 6-year group and 79.2% (95% CI 76.2–81.9) in the 3-year group (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.75–1.16; p = 0.53). Interpretation: Extended aromatase inhibition beyond 5 years of sequential endocrine therapy did not improve the adapted disease-free survival and adapted overall survival of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Funding: AstraZeneca