7 research outputs found

    Dysphagia in Alzheimer's disease [Dysphagie dans la maladie d'Alzheimer]

    No full text
    PubMed ID: 26924307Objective To investigate electrophysiological parameters of swallowing in all stages of Alzheimer's disease. Methods Forty Alzheimer's disease patients, 20 age-matched normal controls and 20 young normal controls were included. Dysphagia limit (DL) and sequential water swallowing (SWS) tests were performed. Cardiac rhythm, respiration and sympathetic skin responses were concomitantly recorded. Results Dysphagia was found in 30/40 (75%) of Alzheimer's disease patients. Mean volume at the DL test was significantly reduced (16.5 ± 1.0 mL) in the Alzheimer's disease group. Swallowing and apnea times in the SWS test were significantly prolonged in elderly controls, but even longer in Alzheimer's disease patients. Conclusions Alzheimer's disease patients had electrophysiological features of dysphagia, even in the early period of disease. The cortical involvement and severity of cognitive disorder can increase swallowing problems, but subclinical signs of dysphagia may be observed even in patients with mild or moderate Alzheimer's disease. © 2016 Elsevier Masson SA

    Diagnostic value of lumbar root stimulation at the early stage of Guillain-Barré syndrome

    No full text
    PubMed ID: 22925837Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate diagnostic value of electrical lumbar root stimulation (RS) at the laminar level in the early stage of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Methods: Fifteen patients (30 sides) and nine controls (17 sides) were included in the study. Conventional nerve conduction studies, needle electromyography, F responses and electrical lumbar RS were obtained from both groups. The needle electrical stimulation was performed at the L2-3 intervertebral level. Vastus lateralis, tibialis anterior and soleus muscles were investigated bilaterally and simultaneously in the first and fourth weeks. Results: In all patients, the amplitudes elicited by lumbar RS were significantly attenuated while the conventional electrophysiological findings were normal and/or not diagnostic in 6 of 15 patients (40%) within the first week. Motor latencies by the lumbar RS were prolonged in the patients, compared to the controls, but the results were not statistically significant. Conclusions: M-responses elicited by lumbar RS appear to be helpful in disclosing proximal conduction abnormalities of GBS early in the course. Significance: Lumbar RS seems to be a useful method in making the diagnosis of GBS early and there is no considerable side effect of this particular method. © 2012 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology

    Guillain-Barré Syndrome and Swallowing Dysfunction

    No full text
    PubMed ID: 28873071Purpose: Patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), especially severe cases that require treatment in intensive care units, often experience swallowing difficulties. However, the oropharyngeal function of patients with GBS not treated in intensive care units is not typically evaluated using neurophysiological techniques. Methods: Electrophysiological techniques were used to determine dysphagia limit and sequential water swallowing values in an electromyography laboratory. Results: This study assessed 18 patients with GBS who were not treated in the intensive care unit between 4 and 45 days after their hospital admission; 18 healthy volunteers were used as a control group. Of the 18 patients with GBS, 7 exhibited the clinical involvement of either a single cranial nerve or a combination of cranial nerves while 11 did not show any lower cranial nerve involvement. Clinical dysphagia was observed in seven patients and six of these cases involved a lower cranial nerve while five patients without cranial nerve involvement had silent dysphagia according to the dysphagia limit test. In addition, the duration of sequential swallowing was significantly prolonged in all patients with GBS compared with the control subjects. Conclusions: The present findings demonstrated that neurophysiological techniques are useful and easily applicable for patients with GBS and that there were no complications. Furthermore, cranial nerve involvement in patients with GBS likely increased the incidence of oropharyngeal dysphagia, and subclinical dysphagia may be present in this population as well. Therefore, neurophysiological techniques can be initially used and then repeated during follow-up visits for all types of patients with GBS. © Copyright 2017 by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society

    Diagnostic value of cauda equina motor conduction time in lumbar spinal stenosis

    No full text
    PubMed ID: 22418591Objective: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a chronic degenerative disease with pain in the back, buttocks and legs aggrevated by walking and relieved after rest without associated vascular disease of lower extremities observed in patients between 50 and 60. years. Several studies, using different methods indicated an association between slowing or blocking of root-nerve conduction and LSS. None of the previous research had applied the more conceivable methods such as recording the cauda equina potentials from the lumbar level or stimulating the spinal roots within the canal using either leg nerves or muscles. In this study, electrical lumbar laminar stimulation was used to demonstrate prolongation of cauda equina motor conduction time in lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: Twenty-one LSS patients and age matched 15 normal control subjects were included in the study. Lumbar laminar electrical stimulation from L1 and L5 vertebra levels were applied by needle electrodes. Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) from gastrocnemius muscles were recorded bilaterally. Latency difference of CMAPs obtained from L1 and L5 spine levels were accepted as the cauda equina motor conduction time (CEMCT). Results: CEMCT was significantly longer in patient group when compared to normal controls. Mean latency difference was 3.59 ± 1.07. msec on the right side, 3.49 ± 1.07. msec on the left side in LSS group, it was 1.45 ± 0.65. msec on the right side, 1.35 ± 0.68. msec on the left side on normal control group (p< 0.0001). Conclusions: The prolongation of CEMCT was statistically and individually significant in patient group. This may indicate that lower lumbosacral motor roots were locally and chronically compressed due to lumbar spinal stenosis. Lumbar spinal stenosis may have induced local demyelination at the cauda equina level. Significance: Since the prolongation of CEMCT was found only in patients with LSS, the method of laminar stimulation can be chosen for patients with uncertain diagnosis of LSS. © 2012 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology

    Appendicitis

    No full text
    corecore