The Prognostic Role of Body Mass Index on Oncological Outcomes of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

(1) Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether overweight and obese upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) patients have better or worse survival outcomes. (2) Methods: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society Urothelial Carcinomas of the Upper Tract (CROES-UTUC) Registry was used to extract the data of normal-weight or overweight/obese UTUC patients between 2014 and 2019. Patients with a BMI between 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m2 were defined as normal weight, while those with a BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2 were considered as overweight/obese group. We compared baseline characteristics among groups categorized by different BMIs. The Kaplan–Meier plots with the log-rank test were used to explore the overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Propensity score matching was performed to eliminate the differences in clinicopathologic features. The Declaration of Helsinki was followed during this study. (3) Results: Of 1196 UTUC patients, 486 patients (40.6%) were normal weight, while 710 patients (59.4%) presented with a BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2. After propensity score matching, all baseline characteristics were balanced. For normal weight and overweight/obese patients, 2-year overall survival rates were 77.8% and 87.2%, 2-year cancer-specific survival rates were 85.2% and 92.7%, and 2-year recurrence rates were 50.6% and 73.0%, respectively. The overweight patients obtained a better RFS (p = 0.003, HR 0.548, 95% CI 0.368–0.916) while their OS (p = 0.373, HR 0.761, 95% CI 0.416–1.390) and CSS (p = 0.272, HR 0.640, 95% CI 0.287–1.427) were similar to normal weight patients. (4) Conclusions: Being overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2) was associated with a decreased risk of recurrence in UTUC patients but not overall survival or cancer-specific survival

Adherence to guideline recommendations in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: An analysis of the CROES-UTUC registry

Background: The European Association of Urology provides Clinical Practice Guideline on upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Due to the rarity of UTUC, guidelines are necessary to help guide decision-making based on the highest quality of care evidence available. Objectives: To evaluate guideline adherence in the management of UTUC by assessing recommendations on diagnostics needed for risk classification and subsequent treatment selection; to assess predictors for the latter. Participants: Data from the Clinical Research Office of the Endo Urology Society UTUC-registry were included for analysis. Statistical analysis: Overall compliance were evaluated by cross-tables, differences in risk groups characteristics and treatment selection were assessed by Chi-square tests, predictors for treatment selection by logistic regression analysis. Results: Data from 2380 patients were included. Imaging by CT-scan had highest adherence (85%) but was low for other diagnostics (17.7–49.7%). Multivariable regression analysis showed higher odds of receiving radical nephroureterectomy in patients with large tumours (OR 5.45, 95% CI 3.77–7.87, p < 0.001), signs of invasion (OR 3.07,CI 2.11–4.46, p < 0.001), high tumour grade (OR 2.05, CI 1.38–3.05, p < 0.001) and multifocality (OR 1.76,CI 1.05–2.97, p =0.032). Conclusions: CT-imaging is the most used and most impactful decision tool for risk-stratification and treatment selection in UTUC. Due to the low compliance in most of the diagnostic recommendations, proper risk stratification is not possible in a significant group of patients raising the question whether current stratification is deemed applicable in daily practice. Established prognostic factors on survival guides decision-making regarding radical versus kidney-sparing surgery. Tumour size was the most influencing factor on treatment decision. Clinical trial registration: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02281188; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02281188)

Epidemiologic study of urolithiasis in seven countries of South-Eastern Europe: S.E.G.U.R. 1 study

Objective: To investigate some epidemiological aspects of kidney stones in the South- Eastern European area. Materials and methods: From September 2015 to December 2015, 538 consecutive patients were treated and evaluated for reno-ureteral stones in eight departments in Bulgaria, Greece, Italy, FYR Macedonia, Romania, Serbia and Turkey. Results: The age of onset was lower in Turkey and higher in Italy. The rate of recurrent patients was higher in Romania and Serbia, while first renal stone formers were more frequent in Italy. The previous history of kidney stones, the characteristics of the stones and the dietary habits of the patients were different in different countries. In Bulgaria, Greece and Romania larger calculi from recurrent patients were more frequent. In Italy and Turkey smaller calculi from first renal stone formers were more frequent. Conclusions: The previous history of kidney stones, the characteristics of the stones and the dietary habits of the patients were different in different countries. A common dietary pattern associated with the formation of kidney stones was not observed, but each country showed different risk factors

Classification and standardized reporting of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): International alliance of urolithiasis (IAU) consensus statements

Background: To reach a consensus in the classification and standardized reporting for the different types of PCNLs. Methods: The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology was used to reach a consensus. Thirty-two statements were formulated reviewing the literature on guidelines and consensus on PCNLs, and included procedure specific details, outcome measurements and a classification for PCNLs. Experts were invited to two rounds of input, the first enabled independent modifications of the proposed statements and provided the option to add statements. The second round facilitated scoring of all statements. Each statement was discussed in the third round to decide which statements to include. Any suggestion or disagreement was debated and discussed to reach a consensual agreement. Results: Twenty-five recommendations were identified to provide standardised reporting of procedure and outcomes. Consensual scoring above 80% were strongly agreed upon by the panel. The top treatment related outcomes were size of sheath used (99.1%) and position for PCNL (93.5%). The highest ranked Outcome Measures included definition of post-operative hospital length of stay (94.4%) and estimated blood loss (93.5%). Conclusions: The consensus statements will be useful to clarify operative technique, in the design of clinical trials and standardized reporting, and presentation of results to compare outcomes of different types of PCNLs

Spectrum of Bacterial Pathogens from Urinary Infections Associated with Struvite and Metabolic Stones

Objective: The purposes of this multi-center study were to evaluate the rate of infection stones and to evaluate the urine cultures of patients with infection stones. Materials: Charts of adulpatients with urinary stones were reviewed and data on stone analyses and urine cultures were collected. Results: In total, 1204 renal stone formers (RSFs) from 10 countries were included (776 males, 428 females). Fifty-six patients (4.6%) had struvite stones. The highest frequency of struvite stones was observed in India (23%) and Pakistan (18%). Lower rates were reported in Canada (2%), China (3%), Argentina (3%), Iraq (3%), Italy (3.5%) and Poland (3%), and intermediate rates in Egypt (5.5%) and Bulgaria (5.4%). Urine cultures were retrieved from 508 patients. Patients with struvite stones had a positive culture in 64.3% of the samples and patients with other stones, in 26.7%. In struvite stones, the most common isolates were Escherichia coli (27.7%) and Proteus spp. (27.7%), followed by Klebsiella spp. (16.7%); in other types of stone, it was Escherichia coli (47.6%), followed by Gram-positive bacteria (14.0%) Conclusions: The struvite stone composition was associated with a urinary infection, although an infection was not demonstrable with a conventional midstream urine culture in about 30%