Safety and efficacy of tenecteplase in patients with wake-up stroke assessed by non-contrast CT (TWIST): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Background: Current evidence supports the use of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in patients with wake-up stroke selected with MRI or perfusion imaging and is recommended in clinical guidelines. However, access to advanced imaging techniques is often scarce. We aimed to determine whether thrombolytic treatment with intravenous tenecteplase given within 4·5 h of awakening improves functional outcome in patients with ischaemic wake-up stroke selected using non-contrast CT. Methods: TWIST was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial with blinded endpoint assessment, conducted at 77 hospitals in ten countries. We included patients aged 18 years or older with acute ischaemic stroke symptoms upon awakening, limb weakness, a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 3 or higher or aphasia, a non-contrast CT examination of the head, and the ability to receive tenecteplase within 4·5 h of awakening. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either a single intravenous bolus of tenecteplase 0·25 mg per kg of bodyweight (maximum 25 mg) or control (no thrombolysis) using a central, web-based, computer-generated randomisation schedule. Trained research personnel, who conducted telephone interviews at 90 days (follow-up), were masked to treatment allocation. Clinical assessments were performed on day 1 (at baseline) and day 7 of hospital admission (or at discharge, whichever occurred first). The primary outcome was functional outcome assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days and analysed using ordinal logistic regression in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2014–000096–80), ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03181360), and ISRCTN (10601890). Findings: From June 12, 2017, to Sept 30, 2021, 578 of the required 600 patients were enrolled (288 randomly assigned to the tenecteplase group and 290 to the control group [intention-to-treat population]). The median age of participants was 73·7 years (IQR 65·9–81·1). 332 (57%) of 578 participants were male and 246 (43%) were female. Treatment with tenecteplase was not associated with better functional outcome, according to mRS score at 90 days (adjusted OR 1·18, 95% CI 0·88–1·58; p=0·27). Mortality at 90 days did not significantly differ between treatment groups (28 [10%] patients in the tenecteplase group and 23 [8%] in the control group; adjusted HR 1·29, 95% CI 0·74–2·26; p=0·37). Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage occurred in six (2%) patients in the tenecteplase group versus three (1%) in the control group (adjusted OR 2·17, 95% CI 0·53–8·87; p=0·28), whereas any intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 33 (11%) versus 30 (10%) patients (adjusted OR 1·14, 0·67–1·94; p=0·64). Interpretation: In patients with wake-up stroke selected with non-contrast CT, treatment with tenecteplase was not associated with better functional outcome at 90 days. The number of symptomatic haemorrhages and any intracranial haemorrhages in both treatment groups was similar to findings from previous trials of wake-up stroke patients selected using advanced imaging. Current evidence does not support treatment with tenecteplase in patients selected with non-contrast CT. Funding: Norwegian Clinical Research Therapy in the Specialist Health Services Programme, the Swiss Heart Foundation, the British Heart Foundation, and the Norwegian National Association for Public Health

History of clinical transplantation

How transplantation came to be a clinical discipline can be pieced together by perusing two volumes of reminiscences collected by Paul I. Terasaki in 1991-1992 from many of the persons who were directly involved. One volume was devoted to the discovery of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), with particular reference to the human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) that are widely used today for tissue matching.1 The other focused on milestones in the development of clinical transplantation.2 All the contributions described in both volumes can be traced back in one way or other to the demonstration in the mid-1940s by Peter Brian Medawar that the rejection of allografts is an immunological phenomenon.3,4 © 2008 Springer New York

History of clinical transplantation

The emergence of transplantation has seen the development of increasingly potent immunosuppressive agents, progressively better methods of tissue and organ preservation, refinements in histocompatibility matching, and numerous innovations is surgical techniques. Such efforts in combination ultimately made it possible to successfully engraft all of the organs and bone marrow cells in humans. At a more fundamental level, however, the transplantation enterprise hinged on two seminal turning points. The first was the recognition by Billingham, Brent, and Medawar in 1953 that it was possible to induce chimerism-associated neonatal tolerance deliberately. This discovery escalated over the next 15 years to the first successful bone marrow transplantations in humans in 1968. The second turning point was the demonstration during the early 1960s that canine and human organ allografts could self-induce tolerance with the aid of immunosuppression. By the end of 1962, however, it had been incorrectly concluded that turning points one and two involved different immune mechanisms. The error was not corrected until well into the 1990s. In this historical account, the vast literature that sprang up during the intervening 30 years has been summarized. Although admirably documenting empiric progress in clinical transplantation, its failure to explain organ allograft acceptance predestined organ recipients to lifetime immunosuppression and precluded fundamental changes in the treatment policies. After it was discovered in 1992 that long-surviving organ transplant recipient had persistent microchimerism, it was possible to see the mechanistic commonality of organ and bone marrow transplantation. A clarifying central principle of immunology could then be synthesized with which to guide efforts to induce tolerance systematically to human tissues and perhaps ultimately to xenografts

A delay in bone marrow transplantation after partial conditioning improves engraftment

Background. In the present study we examined the effect of the timing of marrow infusion on engraftment in nonmyeloablatively conditioned mice.Methods. B10 mice were conditioned with decreasing doses of total body irradiation (TBI) and reconstituted with bone marrow cells (BMCs) from major histocompatibility complex-disparate donor B10.BR mice at 0 or 6 hr, or on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, and 12 with respect to TBI.Results. After undergoing conditioning with 700 cGy TBI and transplantation with 15 x 10(6) BMCs, 100% of recipients engrafted if the marrow was infused between 0 and 4 days after TBI. For lower doses of TBI, a delay in infusion of the marrow after TBI conditioning was associated with a significant increase in engraftment. Significantly less engraftment was achieved in animals conditioned with 600 cGy TBI if the marrow was infused at 0 or 6 hr compared with a 1- to 4-day delay. When the TBI was decreased to 500 cGy, engraftment occurred only when the transplant was performed between days 2 and 8. The highest proportion of recipients engrafted when the marrow was infused on day 4. This enhanced engraftment after a delay in marrow infusion is associated with a significant reduction in host mixed lymphocyte reaction reactivity and is correlated inversely with serum levels of interleukin-6 in the recipient.Conclusions. These data demonstrate for the first time that a delay between conditioning and marrow infusion significantly improves allogeneic engraftment in nonmyeloablatively conditioned recipients and reduces the total conditioning required

A delay in bone marrow transplantation after partial conditioning improves engraftment

Background. In the present study we examined the effect of the timing of marrow infusion on engraftment in nonmyeloablatively conditioned mice.Methods. B10 mice were conditioned with decreasing doses of total body irradiation (TBI) and reconstituted with bone marrow cells (BMCs) from major histocompatibility complex-disparate donor B10.BR mice at 0 or 6 hr, or on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, and 12 with respect to TBI.Results. After undergoing conditioning with 700 cGy TBI and transplantation with 15 x 10(6) BMCs, 100% of recipients engrafted if the marrow was infused between 0 and 4 days after TBI. For lower doses of TBI, a delay in infusion of the marrow after TBI conditioning was associated with a significant increase in engraftment. Significantly less engraftment was achieved in animals conditioned with 600 cGy TBI if the marrow was infused at 0 or 6 hr compared with a 1- to 4-day delay. When the TBI was decreased to 500 cGy, engraftment occurred only when the transplant was performed between days 2 and 8. The highest proportion of recipients engrafted when the marrow was infused on day 4. This enhanced engraftment after a delay in marrow infusion is associated with a significant reduction in host mixed lymphocyte reaction reactivity and is correlated inversely with serum levels of interleukin-6 in the recipient.Conclusions. These data demonstrate for the first time that a delay between conditioning and marrow infusion significantly improves allogeneic engraftment in nonmyeloablatively conditioned recipients and reduces the total conditioning required