17 research outputs found

    The Gender–Age–Physiology system as a prognostic model in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treated with nintedanib: a longitudinal cohort study

    Get PDF
    Introduction: The Gender-Age-Physiology (GAP) system is a tool for predicting prognosis in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Yet, to date, the GAP system has not been evaluated in patients with IPF who received nintedanib. Material and methods: This single-center retrospective study included 89 patients with IPF who received Nintedanib for at least 3 months. All-cause mortality was set as the end point. Clinical parameters, including the GAP stage, were statistically analyzed for risk factors leading to mortality using the Cox proportional hazard model.Results: The median follow-up was 16.4 months (range 3.7–37.4 months), during which 23 patients died. Univariate analysis revealed that the GAP stage (hazard ratio [HR] 3.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52–5.92, p = 0.0014) and PaO2 (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92–0.98, p = 0.0063) were significant prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis revealed that the GAP stage was a significant prognostic factor (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.07–4.78, p = 0.031). Log-rank analysis revealed that there were no significant differences in “Gender” (p = 0.47) and “Age” (p = 0.18) factors. However, there were significant differences in “Physiology” factors (% of forced vital capacity, p = 0.018; % of diffusing capacity of lung carbon monoxide, p < 0.001). The cumulative incidences of mortality at 1 and 2 years were as follows: GAP I: 5.1% and 6.8%; GAP II: 9.5% and 29.3%; and GAP III: 18.9% and 84.2%.Conclusions: The GAP system is useful as a prognostic tool in patients with IPF who have been treated with nintedanib

    Risk factors for acute exacerbation following bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with suspected idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A retrospective cohort study

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is useful for diagnosing diffuse lung disease and excluding other conditions. However, acute exacerbations (AEs) are recognized as important complications of BAL in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This study aimed to identify risk factors for BAL-induced AEs in patients with IPF.Material and methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 155 patients with suspected IPF who had undergone BAL between January 2013 and December 2018. BAL-related AE was defined as the development of AE within 30 days after the procedure. We compared clinical features and parameters between patients with AE (AE group) and without AE (non-AE group). We also reviewed the relevant reported literature.Results: Among the 155 patients, 5 (3.2%) developed AE within 30 days after BAL. The average duration from BAL to AE onset was 7.8 days (2–16 days). Results from the univariate analysis revealed PaO2 < 75 mm Hg (p = 0.036), neutrophil content in BAL ≥ 7% (p = 0.0061), %DLCO < 50% (p = 0.019), Gender-Age-Physiology (GAP) stage III (p = 0.034), and BAL recovery rates < 30% (p < 0.001) as significant risk factors for post-BAL AE. All five patients who developed AE recovered and were discharged.Conclusions: Disease severity, high neutrophil levels in BAL, and poor BAL recovery rates may be risk factors for BAL-induced AE

    Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease on Hemodialysis

    No full text

    Clinical expert consensus document on quantitative coronary angiography from the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics

    No full text
    Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) remains to play an important role in clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance related to the safety and efficacy of new PCI devices. In this document, the current standard methodology of QCA is summarized. In addition, its history, recent development and future perspectives are also reviewed

    Identification of factors during bronchoscopy that affect patient reluctance to undergo repeat examination: Questionnaire analysis after initial bronchoscopy.

    No full text
    BackgroundRe-biopsy by bronchoscopy is an important part of treatment for patients with relapsed lung cancer; however, some patients refuse to undergo a re-examination due to discomfort during their first bronchoscopy. The aim of the present study was to determine factors causing discomfort during bronchoscopy and to identify the factors that affect patients' reluctance to undergo repeat examinations via a questionnaire administered immediately after the initial bronchoscopy.Methods and findingsWe evaluated 283 patients who underwent bronchoscopy at Chiba University Hospital between September 2015 and March 2017. Following bronchoscopy, the patients answered a questionnaire regarding the procedure. We identified patient characteristics and factors related to bronchoscopy that were associated with patients' reluctance to undergo re-examination. Two hundred nine patients were ultimately enrolled in the study. The factors affecting patient tolerance for re-examination were female sex (odds ratio [OR], 2.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-5.53), discomfort during the examination (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.13-2.56), and unexpectedness of discomfort during the examination (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.19-2.81). Patients experienced discomfort most frequently owing to throat anesthesia (n = 50 [24%]).ConclusionsComfort during bronchoscopy is an important factor influencing patient tolerance for re-examination. Expectations of discomfort during bronchoscopy, as indicated by instructions provided before examination, and throat anesthesia are also important factors. Detailed explanations about bronchoscopy and improvement of the methods of throat anesthesia could decrease patient discomfort and may help decrease patients' reluctance to undergo re-examinations

    The Gender–Age–Physiology System as a Prognostic Model in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Treated with Nintedanib: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

    No full text
    Introduction: The Gender-Age-Physiology (GAP) system is a tool for predicting prognosis in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Yet, to date, the GAP system has not been evaluated in patients with IPF who received nintedanib. Material and methods: This single-center retrospective study included 89 patients with IPF who received Nintedanib for at least 3 months. All-cause mortality was set as the end point. Clinical parameters, including the GAP stage, were statistically analyzed for risk factors leading to mortality using the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: The median follow-up was 16.4 months (range 3.7–37.4 months), during which 23 patients died. Univariate analysis revealed that the GAP stage (hazard ratio [HR] 3.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52–5.92, p = 0.0014) and PaO2 (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92–0.98, p = 0.0063) were significant prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis revealed that the GAP stage was a significant prognostic factor (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.07–4.78, p = 0.031). Log-rank analysis revealed that there were no significant differences in “Gender” (p = 0.47) and “Age” (p = 0.18) factors. However, there were significant differences in “Physiology” factors (% of forced vital capacity, p = 0.018; % of diffusing capacity of lung carbon monoxide, p < 0.001). The cumulative incidences of mortality at 1 and 2 years were as follows: GAP I: 5.1% and 6.8%; GAP II: 9.5% and 29.3%; and GAP III: 18.9% and 84.2%. Conclusions: The GAP system is useful as a prognostic tool in patients with IPF who have been treated with nintedanib
    corecore