Opening the black box of academic entrepreneurship: A bibliometric analysis

The increasing importance of academic entrepreneurship as a key mechanism for new innovative advancements and regional economic developments fostered a development of this research domain. The burgeoning literature examining key antecedents and consequences of academic entrepreneurship resulted in complex, multifaceted concept development, which hinder both the possibilities to grasp the crucial interlinkages and a comprehensive assessment of the latest theoretical contributions. Thus, to decrease the current risk of the field’s further fragmentation and to support the comparison with the new emerging patterns, this paper seeks to develop new bibliometric insights and outline a nuanced research agenda for further advancements. To conduct a quantitative literature review, this paper employs bibliographic coupling on a sample of 615 Web of Science peer-reviewed articles on academic entrepreneurship. To conduct a comprehensive interpretation of the bibliometric findings, I perform additional hierarchical clustering of the frequent terms and content analysis of the publications. The results indicate that the academic entrepreneurship research field is based on four interconnected clusters: (1) the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university and its main components, (2) university spinoffs and technology commercialization, (3) the identities of academic entrepreneurs and their motivations and barriers in entrepreneurial activities, and (4) knowledge transfer and regional economic impacts. These findings are of high importance to academics who seek to enhance entrepreneurial processes and to policymakers interested in stimulating academic entrepreneurship

Towards an Integrated Understanding of University Research Commercialisation: A University Spin-Off Perspective

University spin-offs (USOs) are increasingly recognised as a prime mechanism to generate technological, economic and societal impact on regional and national levels. Yet, despite favourable institutional and policy arrangements fostering academic entrepreneurship, many USOs face major issues to overcome the liability of newness and smallness in the initial venturing phases. In result, existing research commercialisation practices remain ineffective with the majority of USOs failing to reach the expected objectives. While this problem has garnered attention both in research and practice, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding of USOs at the early-stage of development, hindering more impactful research commercialisation. To address this problem and to develop new actionable insights, this dissertation employs robust multi-disciplinary, mixed-method techniques. First, this dissertation consolidates and synthesises the existing knowledge on university-industry collaborations and academic entrepreneurship, and presents these concepts as interconnected, multi-layered ecosystems at the individual, organisational and institutional levels. Second, this dissertation examines how early-stage USO characteristics need to be shaped to overcome the initial venturing phases and acquire funding as a leverage for long-term survival. Third, by employing robust text mining and unsupervised machine learning techniques, this dissertation presents a novel USO typology with different venture development trajectories in relation to exploitative and explorative technology development and technology commercialisation activities. The findings of this dissertation foster a comprehensive understanding of university-industry collaborations and academic entrepreneurship research field. Additionally, this dissertation presents new actionable insights for academic entrepreneurs with regards to key determinants of USO development, and stimulates a development of effective government-based support mechanisms of research commercialisation