Acute Coronary Syndrome in Oman : Results from the Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is the most common cause of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in Western countries. International guidelines for diagnosis and treatment have been developed based on randomised clinical trials. However, data from international registries report a lack of association between guideline recommendations and actual clinical practice. Similarly, the Gulf Heart Association initiated a registry called Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE). This registry was developed to determine the characteristics and management of ACS in the Gulf countries including Oman. Here, we report on the results of the various Gulf RACE registry studies from Oman and compare our results with the main Gulf RACE data as well as other international registries

Antibiotic Prescribing Trends in an Omani Paediatric Population

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate antibiotic prescribing patterns for paediatric patients at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH), a tertiary care hospital in Muscat, Oman. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included all 1,186 prescriptions issued for 499 patients at the paediatric outpatient clinic and paediatric inpatient ward at SQUH between March and May 2012. Results: Of the 499 patients, 138 (27.6%) were prescribed a total of 28 different antibiotics. A total of 185 (15.6%) antibiotic prescriptions were issued among the total drug prescriptions. Preschool children aged 0–6 years were prescribed antibiotics most frequently (n = 110). Co-amoxiclav was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic in both inpatients and outpatients (27.0% and 33.9%, respectively), followed by cefuroxime in inpatients (13.5%) and azithromycin in outpatients (18.6%). Co-amoxiclav was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic in both 0–6 (31.3%) and 7–11 (23.3%) year-olds, while cefuroxime was most commonly prescribed in children ≥12 years old (25.0%). Conclusion: Antibiotic prescription patterns in this population were similar to those in North America, Europe and Asia. To confirm the findings of this study, further research on antibiotic prescription trends across the wider paediatric population of Oman should be initiated

Prevalence of Hepatitis C among Multi-transfused Thalassaemic Patients in Oman : Single centre experience

Objectives: Regular blood transfusions are essential for patients with thalassaemia major. However, infections with hepatotropic viruses remain a major concern. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection among patients with homozygous beta thalassaemia in a single centre in Oman. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 200 patients treated at the Thalassemia Unit of Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH) in Muscat, Oman, between August 1991 and December 2011 was performed. Relevant demographic and clinical characteristics were collected, including age, gender, HCV status and the presence of endocrinopathies. Results: A total of 81 patients (41%) were found to be anti-HCV-antibody (anti-HCV)-positive. HCV ribonucleic acid tests were performed on 65 anti-HCV-positive patients and were positive among 33 (51%); the remaining 16 patients died before these tests were available. Anti-HCV-positive patients were significantly older than anti-HCV-negative patients (P <0.001) and were more likely to be diabetic than anti-HCV-negative patients (27% versus 8%; P <0.001). A total of 100 patients had been transfused before they were transferred to SQUH in 1991; of these, 70 (70%) were anti-HCV-positive. Only 11 (11.5%) of the 96 patients who were seronegative in 1991, or who were transfused later, became seropositive. Conclusion: It is likely that the high prevalence of HCV among multi-transfused thalassaemic patients in Oman is due to blood transfusions dating from before the implementation of HCV screening in 1991 as the risk of HCVassociated transfusions has significantly reduced since then. Additionally, results showed that anti-HCV-positive patients were more likely to be diabetic than anti-HCV-negative patients

Asthma Clinics in Primary Healthcare Centres in Oman: Do they make a difference?

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the effect of newly established asthma clinics (ACs) on asthma management at primary healthcare centres (PHCs) in Oman. Methods: This retrospective crosssectional study was conducted between June 2011 and May 2012 in seven PHCs in the Seeb wilayat of Muscat, Oman. All ≥6-year-old asthmatic patients visiting these PHCs during the study period were included. Electronic medical records were reviewed to determine which clinical assessment and management components had been documented. Results: A total of 452 asthmatic patients were included in the study. The mean age was 35 ± 21 years old (range: 6–95 years) and the majority (57%) were female. In total, 288 (64%) cases were managed at ACs and 164 (36%) were managed at general clinics (GCs). Significant differences were noted in the documentation of cases managed at ACs compared to those at GCs, including history-taking information regarding signs and symptoms (91% versus 19%; P <0.001), trigger factors (79% versus 16%; P <0.001) and a history of atopy (81% versus 17%; P <0.001), smoking (61% versus 7%; P <0.001), asthma exacerbations (73% versus 10%; P <0.001) or previous admissions (63% versus 10%; P <0.001). Furthermore, prescription rates of inhaled corticosteroids (72% versus 61%; P = 0.021) and short-acting β-agonists (93% versus 82%; P = 0.001) were significantly higher at ACs compared to GCs. Conclusion: Overall, the findings indicated that ACs have had a positive impact on asthma management at the studied PHCs.Keywords: Asthma; Disease Management; Patient Compliance; Medical History Taking; Medical Records; Documentation; Oman

Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of HIV Infected Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Oman

Objectives: In 2015, the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) set a target that 90% of all people living with HIV will know their HIV status, 90% of those diagnosed will receive antiretroviral therapy, and 90% of those receiving antiretroviral therapy will have viral suppression by 2020. We sought to elucidate the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of HIV infected patients at the Infectious Diseases Clinic at Royal Hospital, Oman, with a focus on the UNAIDS 90-90-90 achieved rates. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the medical records of 326 HIV infected patients from 1989 to 2016. Data collected included demographics, Word Health Organization (WHO) staging, laboratory analyses, and treatment outcomes. Results: The overall mean age of the cohort was 36.0±15.0 years, and 60.4% (n = 197) were males. The majority of patients acquired HIV through heterosexual transmission (58.9%; n = 192). At the time of the first clinic visit, 26.1% (n = 85) of patients had WHO stage 4 HIV infection. The rates of HIV/HBV and HIV/HCV coinfections were 2.7% and 5.8%, respectively. The baseline CD4+ cells count was 500 cells/mm<3 in 27.0% (n = 88) of patients. The baseline HIV RNA titer was greater than 1000 copies/mL3 in 74.5% (n = 243) of the cohort. A total of 96.3% (n = 314) of patients received antiretroviral therapy, most commonly non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimens. HIV genotype resistance testing was performed in 165 patients (50.6%) either at baseline in treatment naïve patients or following treatment failure. Among the 326 patients included, 22 patients (6.7%) died, and 29 patients (8.9%) were lost to follow-up. Conclusions: Regarding the UNAIDs 90-90-90 target, over a quarter of the patients presented late with WHO stage 4 HIV disease, 96.3% of cohort patients received antiretroviral treatment, and 71.5% achieved virological suppression

Comparative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in an Omani Tertiary Care Hospital.

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and warfarin as well as to determine the appropriateness of dosing and prescribing of rivaroxaban in Omani patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Royal Hospital data registry. The study included all adults newly diagnosed with NVAF and treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin. The outcomes measured include ischaemic stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), non-gastrointestinal bleeding (NGIB), as well as appropriateness of dosing and prescribing of rivaroxaban. Results: The analysis included 96 rivaroxaban users and 183 warfarin users; 51% of the cohort included males. There were no significant differences observed in the risk of ischaemic stroke between the two groups (hazard ratio (HR), 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4-3.4; p=0.8). However, those on rivaroxaban exhibited a significantly higher rate of GIB compared to those on warfarin (HR, 5.9; 95% CI: 2.9-11.7; p=0.001). There were no differences observed with regards to NGIB between the two groups (HR, 0.9; 95% CI: 0.4-1.9; p=0.8). Dosing and prescribing of rivaroxaban were found to be appropriate in 89% of the patients, with only 6% being prescribed an inappropriately lower dose. Conclusion: The study demonstrated no significant differences in the risk of ischaemic stroke or NGIB between rivaroxaban and warfarin groups in newly diagnosed NVAF patients. However, rivaroxaban users were found to have a significantly higher risk of GIB. Rivaroxaban was appropriately prescribed to the majority of the patients, and only a small proportion of the group received an inappropriately lower dose of rivaroxaban

Impact of Clinical Pharmacists-driven Bundled Activities from Admission to Discharge on 90-day Hospital Readmissions and Emergency Department Visits

Objectives: Patient-centered clinical pharmacists’ activities play a major role in improving clinical outcomes by optimizing the efficacy of drug therapies and minimizing associated toxicities during hospitalization, at the transition of care, and upon discharge. We aimed to compare the impact of comprehensive versus partial clinical pharmacists-driven bundled of care services on the rate of 90-day hospital readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits. Methods: This retrospective study included all admitted patients who received a comprehensive or partial bundle of clinical pharmacy services (medication history, interventions, counseling, and discharge prescription review) from 1 January 2021 to 30 June 2021 at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital. The comprehensive bundle of care included the four services, while the partial bundle of care included one, two, or three services only. Analyses were performed using univariate and multivariate statistical techniques. Results: The study included 430 patients with a mean age of 56.0±21.0 years, and 43.7% (n = 188) were male. Of the patients, 12.1% (n = 52) received a comprehensive bundle of care. Compared with the partial bundle of care group, the comprehensive bundle of care group had significantly more patients with diabetes (65.4% vs. 42.9%; p =0.002), ≥ 3 comorbidities (50.0% vs. 29.4%; p =0.003), and polypharmacy (≥ 5 medications) (73.1% vs. 46.0%; p < 0.001). The comprehensive bundle of care group was significantly associated with a lower 90-day readmission rate (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.90–0.82; p =0.021) but not with ED visits (aOR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.13–2.57; p =0.461). Conclusions: This study demonstrated a significant reduction in the 90-day readmission rate for patients on a comprehensive bundle of care but not ED visits. These findings emphasize the importance of the comprehensive services provided by clinical pharmacists on the healthcare resources use and clinical outcomes

The association between diabetes related medical costs and glycemic control: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: The objective of this research is to quantify the association between direct medical costs attributable to type 2 diabetes and level of glycemic control. METHODS: A longitudinal analysis using a large health plan administrative database was performed. The index date was defined as the first date of diabetes diagnosis and individuals had to have at least two HbA1c values post index date in order to be included in the analyses. A total of 10,780 individuals were included in the analyses. Individuals were stratified into groups of good (N = 6,069), fair (N = 3,586), and poor (N = 1,125) glycemic control based upon mean HbA1c values across the study period. Differences between HbA1c groups were analyzed using a generalized linear model (GLM), with differences between groups tested by utilizing z-statistics. The analyses allowed a wide range of factors to affect costs. RESULTS: 42.1% of those treated only with oral agents, 66.1% of those treated with oral agents and insulin, and 57.2% of those treated with insulin alone were found to have suboptimal control (defined as fair or poor) throughout the study period (average duration of follow-up was 2.95 years). Results show that direct medical costs attributable to type 2 diabetes were 16% lower for individuals with good glycemic control than for those with fair control ($1,505 vs.$1,801, p < 0.05), and 20% lower for those with good glycemic control than for those with poor control ($1,505 vs.$1,871, p < 0.05). Prescription drug costs were also significantly lower for individuals with good glycemic control compared to those with fair ($377 vs.$465, p < 0.05) or poor control ($377 vs.$423, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Almost half (44%) of all patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes are at sub-optimal glycemic control. Evidence from this analysis indicates that the direct medical costs of treating type 2 diabetes are significantly higher for individuals who have fair or poor glycemic control than for those who have good glycemic control. Patients under fair control account for a greater proportion of the cost burden associated with antidiabetic prescription drugs