Intraoperative patient experience and postoperative visual quality after SMILE and LASIK in a randomized, paired-eye, controlled study

PURPOSE: To compare intraoperative and postoperative subjective patient experience after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser–assisted LASIK. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, paired-eye, single-masked clinical trial at Singapore National Eye Centre, 70 patients were randomly treated with SMILE and LASIK in each eye. The intraoperative questionnaire was completed immediately after surgery and included light perception and levels of anxiety, fear, and discomfort. The postoperative 1- and 3-month questionnaires evaluated severity of light sensitivity, eye discomfort, eye dryness, excessive tearing, gritty sensation, glare, halos, blurring, and fluctuations in vision. RESULTS: Average discomfort scores were higher during tissue manipulation in SMILE (1.9 ± 0.9) than flap lifting in LASIK (1.59 ± 0.8) (P = .020) but comparable during docking and laser application (P > .249). Fear scores were lower in SMILE than LASIK during docking (2.6 ± 1.6 vs 3.4 ± 1.9, P = .024) but similar during occasional blackout, laser application, and lenticule/flap manipulation (P > .364). Fear scores were generally higher in patients with intraoperative suction loss (n = 3). For SMILE, light sensitivity, eye discomfort, blurring, and fluctuations in vision improved from 1 to 3 months (P < .039). For LASIK, improvements were reported for light sensitivity, eye discomfort, eye dryness, gritty sensation, and fluctuations in vision from 1 to 3 months (P < .046). At 1 month, patients experienced more blurring after SMILE than LASIK (2.1 ± 0.8 vs 1.8 ± 0.7, P = .025), but with no differences in any of the visual symptoms at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Tissue manipulation may be more uncomfortable during SMILE than LASIK, but not more frightening. Subjective visual symptoms were comparable after 3 months

Functional optical zone and centration following SMILE and LASIK : a prospective, randomized, contralateral eye study

Purpose : To compare centration and functional optical zone (FOZ) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser–assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Methods : In this prospective, randomized, single-masked, paired-eyed, clinical trial, 70 patients received SMILE in one eye and LASIK in the other eye for myopia and myopic astigmatism. FOZ was calculated using custom software on 3-month postoperative refractive power maps (Pentacam HR; Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Programmed treatment area was defined as the total area of the programmed OZ plus the transition zone. Centration was evaluated by the linear distance between FOZ centroid and the pupil center and the corneal apex. Results : The average preoperative spherical equivalent (−5.38 ± 1.65 vs −5.45 ± 1.61 diopters [D]), postoperative spherical equivalent (0.05 ± 0.39 vs 0.06 ± 0.39 D), uncorrected distance visual acuity (0.01 ± 0.13 vs 0.00 ± 0.08 logMAR), and corrected distance visual acuity (−0.07 ± 0.10 vs −0.07 ± 0.10 logMAR) were comparable in SMILE- and LASIK-treated eyes of the 60 patients with complete datasets (P > .419). Postoperative increase in spherical aberration was lower in SMILE than in LASIK (0.08 ± 0.16 vs 0.17 ± 0.18 µm, P = .002). The FOZ area was significantly larger in SMILE than in LASIK (30.25 ± 3.60 vs 29.21 ± 3.72 mm2), despite the smaller programmed OZ diameter (6.48 ± 0.08 vs 6.52 ± 0.11 mm) and smaller programmed treatment area (33.87 ± 0.81 vs 46.30 ± 2.61 mm2, P .694). Conclusions : SMILE created a larger FOZ than LASIK, despite the smaller programmed OZ. This may be due to a difference in the biomechanical response between the two procedures. Visual outcome and centration were comparable between SMILE and LASIK