24 research outputs found

    The future of conservation and development in Madagascar: Time for a new paradigm?

    Get PDF
    The history of conservation policy and practice in Madagascar over the last 30 years shows that the Malagasy government, donors and non -  governmental organisations (NGOs) have not been short of bold solutions, with ambitious attempts to involve local communities in resource  management as well as expand protected areas. While there have been notable achievements, continued threats to the island’s flora and fauna, as well as the negative impacts that conservation policy has often had on rural livelihoods, show that there is still much to be done. So what are the  lessons from the past and the challenges ahead? In this paper I provide a broad overview of recent research in the social sciences on conservation  and development in Madagascar. I argue that conservation science and  policy have often been based on overly simplistic understandings of  human-environment interactions and sometimes even plain myths. This has contributed to a narrow policy vision, with important issues and  ecosystems receiving less attention. Furthermore, conservation policy  continues to be based on a highly uneven distribution of costs and  benefits. In order to address these limitations, research and policy must do more to deal with differences in perceptions, priorities and power and be willing to embrace trade - offs between various conservation anddevelopment goals. L’histoire de la politique et la pratique de la protection de la nature Ă  Madagascar au cours des 30 derniĂšres annĂ©es montre que le  gouvernement malgache, les donateurs, et les organisations non - gouvernementales (ONG) n’ont pas manquĂ© de grandes solutions. Cela inclut l’implication des communautĂ©s locales dans la gestion des  ressources naturelles ainsi que l’expansion des aires protĂ©gĂ©es. MalgrĂ© des rĂ©ussites notables, il reste beaucoup Ă  faire car la biodiversitĂ© continue d’ĂȘtre menacĂ©e et les politiques adoptĂ©es ont souvent eu des impacts nĂ©gatifs sur les moyens d’existence des mĂ©nages ruraux. Quelles sont les leçons Ă  tirer du passĂ© et les dĂ©fis Ă  relever pour le futur ? Au cours des deux derniĂšres annĂ©es, j’ai eu le privilĂšge d’ĂȘtre le rĂ©dacteur et  coordinateur d’une publication sur la ‘Conservation et la Gestion de l’Environnement Ă  Madagascar’ (Routledge, Londres). Je me propose de rĂ©sumer ici les thĂšmes, les enjeux et les dĂ©bats qui ont Ă©mergĂ© de cette publication. Mon argument principal est que la science et la politique de la conservation Ă  Madagascar ont souvent Ă©tĂ© basĂ©es sur une conception Ă©troite des interactions entre l’homme et l’environnement, en particulier sur les facteurs sociaux, politiques et Ă©conomiques de l’utilisation des ressources naturelles et la dĂ©gradation de l’environnement. Les histoires de crise jalonnent le discours environnemental de Madagascar dans lequel dominent les problĂ©matiques. Le leitmotiv le plus commun, qui est aussi le plus problĂ©matique, porte sur l’idĂ©e que le dĂ©boisement de l’ü. %. . . . Ăźle . a Ă©tĂ© de 90. %%%%. Ce ‘fait’ est souvent . Ă©noncĂ©. dans la littĂ©rature acadĂ©mique et gĂ©nĂ©ralement repris les organisations de conservation de la nature afin de montrer l’urgence du problĂšme de la dĂ©gradation de l’environnement. En consĂ©quence les zones herbeuses de l’üle sont tout simplement perçues comme des paysages dĂ©gradĂ©s. Un autre leitmotiv concerne la culture sur brĂ»lis qui est imputĂ©e Ă  la pauvretĂ© et une ignorance de ‘meilleures’ pratiques. Ces formules galvaudĂ©es ont contribuĂ© Ă  une politique aux perspectives restreintes dans laquelle certaines problĂ©matiques et des Ă©cosystĂšmes importants ne reçoivent pas les considĂ©rations qu’ils mĂ©ritent. Elles ont Ă©galement contribuĂ© Ă  Ă©tablir des ‘forteresses de la conservation’ qui sont essentiellement fondĂ©es sur l’exclusion des paysans malgaches des zones protĂ©gĂ©es avec son lot de consĂ©quences sur les moyens d’existence des populations rurales. MalgrĂ© les efforts dĂ©ployĂ©s pour impliquer les communautĂ©s rurales dans la gestion des ressources naturelles, la politique continue d’aboutir Ă  une rĂ©partition inĂ©gale des coĂ»ts et des avantages. Pour trouver une solution, la recherche et les politiques doivent adopter un nouveau paradigme qui : i) s’éloigne des rĂ©cits et des mythes problĂ©matiques ; ii) reconnaisse les diffĂ©rences dans les perceptions et les prioritĂ©s des divers acteurs ; iii) adopte l’arbitrage entre les diffĂ©rents objectifs de conservation et de dĂ©veloppement ; et iv) englobe un ensemble plus diversifiĂ© de voix et d’opinions

    Identity, subjectivity and natural resource use: How ethnicity, gender and class intersect to influence mangrove oyster harvesting in The Gambia

    Get PDF
    Environmental policies have paid increasing attention to the socio-cultural dimensions of human–environment interactions, in an effort to address the failures of previous ‘top-down’ practices which imposed external rules and regulations and ignored local beliefs and customs. As a result, the relationship between identity and resource use is an area of growing interest in both policy and academic circles. However, most research has treated forms of social difference such as gender, ethnicity and class as separate dimensions that produce distinct types of inequalities and patterns of resource use. In doing so, research fails to embrace key insights from theories of intersectionality and misses the key role of space and place in shaping individual and group subjectivities. In this paper we investigate how multiple types of identity influence resource use and practice among a group of women oyster harvesters in The Gambia. We find that oyster harvesting is shaped by the confluence of an aversion to stigmatised waged labour; gendered expectations of providing for one’s family; and an historically informed and spatially bounded sense of ethnicity. Drawing on the concept of contact zones, we show how new interactions and intra-actions between previously isolated groups of oyster harvesters have broadened conceptions of ethnicity. However, we find that new subjectivities overlay rather than replace old clan alliances, leading to tensions. We argue that new contact zones and emerging subjectivities can thus be at once uniting and divisive, with important implications for natural resource management.Ivan Scales was supported by a Royal Geographical Society-Institute of British Geographers Small Research Grant and an Early Career Fellowship from the Centre for Research in the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities at the University of Cambridge. Jacqueline Lau was supported by the Cambridge Commonwealth Trust, a St Catharine’s College Travel Grant and a University of Cambridge Department of Geography Phillip Lake Fund Grant.This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.01.00

    Bushfire in Madagascar: natural hazard, useful tool, and change agent

    Get PDF
    Bushfire does not usually figure on lists of natural hazards in Madagascar, despite being damaging hazard on the island. This chapter argues that the lack of attention to fire comes from the fact that fire is multivalent, ambiguous, and flexible, being simultaneously an occasional 'hazard' for thatch-roof huts or crop fields, a 'useful tool' that farmers and pastoralists use to manage vegetation, and a major transformational force, or 'change agent', that damages land and forest. The chapter builds on the concept of pyric phases, identifying six important pyric phases in which fire serves, or is perceived to serve, different roles as hazard, tool, or change agent

    A922 Sequential measurement of 1 hour creatinine clearance (1-CRCL) in critically ill patients at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI)

    Get PDF
    Meeting abstrac
    corecore