4 research outputs found

    Concurrent Oral 9 - rheumatoid arthritis: aetiopathogenesis [OP59-OP64]: OP59. The value of interleukin-17 serum level in rheumatoid arthritis immunopathogenesis

    Full text link
    Background: Interleukin (IL)-17 is the main Th-1 cytokine, produced by activated T-lymphocytes. The potential IL-17 value in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pathogenesis consists of its independent inflammatory response induction and mediated stimulation of proinflammatory factors synthesis resulting in joint destruction. The aim of study was to determine the role of IL-17 in immuno-inflammatory/autoimmune reactions development and to reveal IL-17 serum level associations with clinical and immunological characteristics of RA. Methods: 50 patients with early RA (disease duration >, Russia), anti-CCP antibodies (Axies-Shield Diagnostic, UK) were revealed using ELISA immunoassay. Results: On the base of IL-17 serum level patients were divided in two groups: group1 (n = 28) were patients with normal IL-17 serum level and group2 (n = 22) were those with high IL-17 serum level. In the group2, the rate of patients' pain assessment by visual analogue scale (67.3 ± 7.2 vs 32.8 ± 4.6; P < 0.001), tender (16.7 ± 2.0 vs 8.4 ± 1.1; P < 0.01) and swollen (12.3 ± 2.3 vs 3.9 ± 0.8; P < 0.01) joint count, DAS28 (5.0 ± 0.4 vs 2.8 ± 0.2 P < 0.01) were significantly higher compare to group1. It was found that in group2 the higher T-lymphocyte amount (CD3) was due to CD4 higher quantity, at the same time CD8 amount was significantly lower (22.2 ± 1.5% vs 28.4 ± 1.7%, P < 0.05) compare to group1. This caused the immunoregulative index increasing and indicated in the lost of autoimmune process regulation, including B-lymphocytes (CD19) activation. The CD154 expression was significantly lower in the group2 (3.4 ± 0.4% vs 10.8 ± 2.8%, P < 0.05) compare to group1. The difference in autoimmune reaction indices wasn't significant between groups except antibody-producing B-lymphocytes (13.7 ± 1.5% vs 8.5 ± 1.0%, P < 0.05) and IgM RF serum level (2.9 ± 0.3 U/ml vs 1.6 ± 0.5 U/ml, P < 0.05), which were significantly higher in group1. The IL-17 level had a positive correlative connections with DAS28 (r = 0.7; P < 0.05), circulative immune complex level (r = 0.38; P < 0.05), anti-CCP antibodies (r = 0.4; P < 0.05), IgM RF (r = 0.41; P < 0.05), CD4 (r = 0.38; P < 0.05) and negative correlative connection with CD8 (r = -0.39; P < 0.05). Conclusions: The importance of IL-17 value in immuno-inflammatory and autoimmune reactions development through T-lymphocytes activation in RA pathogenesis was confirmed. Thus the influence on T-depended immuno-inflammatory reaction products synthesis could be a new therapeutic target of RA patients' management. Disclosure statement: All authors have declared no conflicts of interes

    Differences and similarities in rheumatology specialty training programmes across European countries

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES: To analyse the similarities and discrepancies between the official rheumatology specialty training programmes across Europe. METHODS: A steering committee defined the main aspects of training to be assessed. In 2013, the rheumatology official training programmes were reviewed for each of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) countries and two local physicians independently extracted data on the structure of training, included competencies and assessments performed. Analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: 41 of the 45 EULAR countries currently provide specialist training in rheumatology; in the remaining four rheumatologists are trained abroad. 36 (88%) had a single national curriculum, one country had two national curricula and four had only local or university-specific curricula. The mean length of training programmes in rheumatology was 45 (SD 19) months, ranging between 3 and 72 months. General internal medicine training was mandatory in 40 (98%) countries, and was performed prior to and/or during the rheumatology training programme (mean length: 33 (19) months). 33 (80%) countries had a formal final examination. CONCLUSIONS: Most European countries provide training in rheumatology, but the length, structure, contents and assessments of these training programmes are quite heterogeneous. In order to promote excellence in standards of care and to support physicians' mobility, a certain degree of harmonisation should be encouraged
    corecore