Molecular subtyping of head and neck cancer - Clinical applicability and correlations with morphological characteristics

AIM: We aimed to evaluate the applicability of a customized NanoString panel for molecular subtyping of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M-HNSCC). Additionally, histological analyses were conducted, correlated with the molecular subtypes and tested for their prognostic value. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted molecular subtyping of R/M-HNSCC according to the molecular subtypes defined by Keck et al. For molecular analyses a 231 gene customized NanoString panel (the most accurately subtype defining genes, based on previous analyses) was applied to tumor samples from R/M-HNSCC patients that were treated in the CeFCiD trial (AIO/IAG-KHT trial 1108). A total of 130 samples from 95 patients were available for sequencing, of which 80 samples from 67 patients passed quality controls and were included in histological analyses. H&E stained slides were evaluated regarding distinct morphological patterns (e.g. tumor budding, nuclear size, stroma content). RESULTS: Determination of molecular subtypes led to classification of tumor samples as basal (n = 46, 45 %), inflamed/mesenchymal (n = 31, 30 %) and classical (n = 26, 25 %). Expression levels of Amphiregulin (AREG) were significantly higher for the basal and classical subtypes compared to the mesenchymal subtype. While molecular subtypes did not have an impact on survival, high levels of tumor budding were associated with poor outcomes. No correlation was found between molecular subtypes and histological characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing the 231-gene NanoString panel we were able to determine the molecular subtype of R/M-HNSCC samples by the use of FFPE material. The value to stratify for different treatment options remains to be explored in the future. The prognostic value of tumor budding was underscored in this clinically well annotated cohort

Combination of copanlisib with cetuximab improves tumor response in cetuximab-resistant patient-derived xenografts of head and neck cancer

Despite recent advances, the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains an area of high unmet medical need. HNSCC is frequently associated with either amplification or mutational changes in the PI3K pathway, making PI3K an attractive target particularly in cetuximab-resistant tumors. Here, we explored the antitumor activity of the selective, pan-class I PI3K inhibitor copanlisib with predominant activity towards PI3Kα and δ in monotherapy and in combination with cetuximab using a mouse clinical trial set-up with 33 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models with known HPV and PI3K mutational status and available data on cetuximab sensitivity. Treatment with copanlisib alone resulted in moderate antitumor activity with 12/33 PDX models showing either tumor stabilization or regression. Combination treatment with copanlisib and cetuximab was superior to either of the monotherapies alone in the majority of the models (21/33), and the effect was particularly pronounced in cetuximab-resistant tumors (14/16). While no correlation was observed between PI3K mutation status and response to either cetuximab or copanlisib, increased PI3K signaling activity evaluated through gene expression profiling showed a positive correlation with response to copanlisib. Together, these data support further investigation of PI3K inhibition in HNSCC and suggests gene expression patterns associated with PI3K signaling as a potential biomarker for predicting treatment responses

Tumour mutational burden and survival with molecularly matched therapy

BACKGROUND: The impact of tumour mutational burden (TMB) on outcome with molecularly matched therapy is unknown. Higher TMB could predict resistance to molecularly matched therapy through co-occurring driver mutations. METHODS: One hundred and four patients with advanced cancers underwent molecular profiling in the DKTK-MASTER program. Fifty-five patients received systemic therapy excluding immunotherapy. Patients with molecularly matched (n = 35) or non-molecularly informed therapy (n = 20) were analysed for TMB and survival. Results were validated in an independent cohort of patients receiving molecularly matched (n = 68) or non-molecularly informed therapy (n = 40). Co-occurring driver mutations and TMB were analysed in the exploratory cohort and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets. RESULTS: Patients were stratified by the median TMB of 1.67 mutations per Megabase (mut/Mb) of 35 patients receiving molecularly matched therapy into TMB-high or TMB-low groups. Median overall survival (4 months [95% CI, 3.3-7.6] versus 12.8 months [95% CI, 10-not reached], p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (1.8 months [95% CI, 1.1-3.7] versus 7.9 months [95% CI, 2.8-17.0], p = 0.003) were significantly shorter in the TMB-high group compared to the TMB-low group. In the validation cohort, shorter OS and PFS were identified in the TMB-high group (TMB cut-off of 4 mut/Mb) treated with molecularly matched therapy. No differences were observed in patients receiving non-molecularly informed systemic therapy. A significant correlation between co-occurring driver mutations and TMB (n = 104, r = 0.78 [95% CI, 0.68-0.85], p < 0.001) was found in the exploratory cohort as well as the majority (24/33) of TCGA studies. CONCLUSION: A high TMB was associated with unfavourable outcome in patients receiving molecularly matched therapy, indicating untargeted resistance pathways. Therefore, TMB should be further investigated as a predictive biomarker in precision oncology programs

Support of a molecular tumour board by an evidence-based decision management system for precision oncology

BACKGROUND: Reliable and reproducible interpretation of molecular aberrations constitutes a bottleneck of precision medicine. Evidence-based decision management systems may improve rational therapy recommendations. To cope with an increasing amount of complex molecular data in the clinical care of patients with cancer, we established a workflow for the interpretation of molecular analyses. METHODS: A specialized physician screened results from molecular analyses for potential biomarkers, irrespective of the diagnostic modality. Best available evidence was retrieved and categorized through establishment of an in-house database and interrogation of publicly available databases. Annotated biomarkers were ranked using predefined evidence levels and subsequently discussed at a molecular tumour board (MTB), which generated treatment recommendations. Subsequent translation into patient treatment and clinical outcomes were followed up. RESULTS: One hundred patients were discussed in the MTB between January 2016 and May 2017. Molecular data were obtained for 70 of 100 patients (50 whole exome/RNA sequencing, 18 panel sequencing, 2 immunohistochemistry (IHC)/microsatellite instability analysis). The MTB generated a median of two treatment recommendations each for 63 patients. Thirty-nine patients were treated: 6 partial responses and 12 stable diseases were achieved as best responses. Genetic counselling for germline events was recommended for seven patients. CONCLUSION: The development of an evidence-based workflow allowed for the clinical interpretation of complex molecular data and facilitated the translation of personalized treatment strategies into routine clinical care. The high number of treatment recommendations in patients with comprehensive genomic data and promising responses in patients treated with combination therapy warrant larger clinical studies