Bentall Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background. The Bentall procedure is considered the gold standard in the treatment of patients requiring aortic root replacement. An up-to-date overview of outcomes after the Bentall procedure is lacking. Methods. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of characteristics of and long-term outcome after the Bentall procedure with a mechanical valve prosthesis. Pooling was performed using the inverse variance method within a random-effects model. Outcome events are reported as linearized occurrence rates (percentage per patient year) with 95% confidence intervals. Results. In total, 46 studies with 7,629 patients (mean age, 50 years; 76% men) were selected. Pooled early mortality was 6% (422 patients). During a mean follow-up of 6 years (49,175 patient-years), the annual linearized occurrence rate for late mortality was 2.02% (1.77%-2.31%; 892 patients), for aortic root reoperation it was 0.46% (0.36%-0.59%), for hemorrhage it was 0.64% (0.47%-0.87%), for thromboemboli it was 0.77% (0.60%-1.00%), for endocarditis it was 0.39% (0.33%-0.46%), and for major adverse valve-related events it was 2.66% (2.17%-3.24%). Operations performed in more recent years were associated with lower rates of aortic root reoperation (beta = -0.452; p = 0.015). Conclusions. This systematic review illustrates that rates of aortic root reoperation after the Bentall procedure have decreased over the years. However, late mortality, major bleeding, and thromboembolic complications remain a concern. This report may be used to benchmark the potential therapeutic benefit of novel surgical approaches, such as valve-sparing aortic root replacement. (C) 2016 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeon

Reported Outcome After Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement for Aortic Root Aneurysm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Valve-sparing aortic root techniques have progressively gained ground in the treatment of aortic root aneurysm and aortic insufficiency. By avoiding anticoagulation therapy they offer a good alternative to composite graft replacement. This systematic review describes the reported outcome of valve-sparing aortic root replacement, focusing on the remodeling and reimplantation technique. A systematic literature search on the characteristics of and outcomes after valve-sparing aortic root replacement revealed 1,659 articles. The inclusion criteria were a focus on valve-sparing aortic root replacement in adults with aortic root aneurysm, presentation of survival data, and inclusion of at least 30 patients. Data were pooled by inverse variance weighting and analyzed by linear regression. Of 1,659 articles published between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2014, 31 were included (n = 4,777 patients). The mean age at operation was 51 +/- 14.7 years, and 14% of patients had a bicuspid aortic valve. The reimplantation technique was used in 72% and remodeling in 27% (1% other). No clinical advantage in terms of survival and reoperation of one technique over the other was found. Cusp repair was performed in 33%. Pooled early mortality was 2% (n = 103). During follow-up (21,716 patient-years), 262 patients died (survival 92%), and 228 (5%) underwent reoperation, mainly valve replacement. Major adverse valve-related events were low (1.66% patient-years). Preoperative severe aortic valve regurgitation showed a trend toward higher reoperation rate. Remodeling and reimplantation techniques show comparable survival and valve durability results, providing a valid alternative to composite valve replacement. The heterogeneity in the data underlines the need for a collaborative effort to standardize outcome reporting. (C) 2015 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeon