Tuning the superconducting state in the magnetic MoSr2YCu2O8 materials

The properties of the MoSr2YCu2O8 materials are found to systematically change with the oxygen concentration determined by the sintering and annealing conditions. The as-prepared (asp) sample is anti-ferromagnetically (AFM) ordered at 16 K. The magnetic features are related to the Mo5+ sublattice. Annealing under an oxygen atmosphere induces superconductivity (SC) in the Cu-O planes, and the TC and the shielding fraction values obtained depend strongly on the oxygen concentration. Annealing the asp material at 1030 C under ambient oxygen atmosphere yields TC of 18 K, whereas further annealing at 650 C under 92 atm. of oxygen, shifts TC to 32 K. The AFM ordering, which coexists with SC state through effectively decoupled subsystems, is not affected by the presence or absence of the SC state. In all samples studied, TN < TC. This behavior resembles most of the inter-metallic magneto-superconductors, but is in sharp contrast to the iso-structural RuSr2GdCu2O8 system where TN > TC.Comment: 7 pages, 8 Figure

The magnetic behavior of Li2MO3 (M=Mn, Ru and Ir) and Li2(Mn1-xRux)O3

The present study summerizes magnetic and Mossbauer measurements on ceramic Li2MO3 M= Mn, Ru and Ir and the mixed Li2(Mn1-xRux)O3 materials, which show many of the features reflecting to antiferromagnetic ordering or to existence of paramagnetic states. Li2IrO3 and Li2RuO3 are paramagnetic down to 5 K. Li2(Mn1-xRux)O3 compounds are antiferromagnetically ordered at TN = 48 K for x=0. TN decreases as the Ru content increases and, for x=0.8, TN =34 K.Comment: accepted to Physica

The possible origin of the higher magnetic phase transition in RuSr2Eu1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10 (Ru-1222)

Two magnetic transitions are observed in the magneto-superconducting RuEu2-xCexSr2Cu2O10 (Ru-1222), at TM 160 K and TM2~80 K. Below TM2 the Ru moments are weak-ferromagnetically ordered and wide ferromagnetic hysteresis loops are observed, they become narrow and disappear at ~ 60-70 K. Above TM2, (i) small antiferromagnetic-like hysteresis loops reappear with a peak in the coercive fields around 120 K. (ii) A small peak at ~120 K is also observed in the dc and ac susceptibility curves. The two phenomena are absent in the non-SC x=1 samples. For x<1, the decrease of the Ce4+ content, is compensated by non-homogeneous oxygen depletion, which may induce a reduction of Ru5+ ions to Ru4+. The higher ordering temperature, TM, which does not change with x, may result from Ru4+ rich clusters, in which the Ru4+-Ru4+ exchange interactions are stronger than the Ru5+-Ru5+ interactions. In the superconducting Ru1-xMoxSr2Eu1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10 (x=0-0.4) system, TM2 shifts to low temperature with x (14 K for x=0.4), whereas TM is not affected by the Mo content, indicating again that TM may not correspond to the main phase. Two scenarios are suggested to explain the magnetic phenomena at TM2<T< TM. (i) They are due to a small fraction of nano-size islands inside the crystal grains, in which the Ru4+ concentration is high and are magnetically ordered below TM. (ii) The presence of nanoparticles of a foreign minor extra Ru4+ magnetic phase of Sr-Cu-Ru-O3, which orders at TM, in which Cu is distributed inhomogeneously in both the Ru and Sr sitesComment: 11 pages, 10 figure