10 research outputs found

    Flow field characterization in a premixed, swirling annular flow

    No full text
    This paper presents measurements and large eddy simulations of the flowfield in an annular, swirling, reacting flowfield. Depending upon operating conditions, the flame can exhibit four different configurations, depending upon whether it is stabilized in the vortex breakdown bubble, inner shear layer, and/or outer shear layer. Flow field characteristics such as vortex breakdown bubble length, vortex breakdown zone topology, annular jet spreading angle, and outer recirculation zone topology vary substantially between these different configurations. For the most case, the LES captures these different topological flow features and flow bifurcations, although some quantitative differences exist for the reacting cases, principally in strength of the recirculation zone and jet spreading angle. Copyright © 2012 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc

    Flame and flow topologies in an annular swirling flow

    No full text
    This article describes an investigation of flame shapes and flow configurations in a premixed, swirl-stabilized dump combustor. High swirl, annular nozzle flows of this nature enable a variety of different flame configurations and heat release distributions with their associated flow fields. These differences are significant, since each of these configurations, in turn, has different thermoacoustic sensitivities and influences on combustor emissions, nozzle lifetime, and liner heating. These different configurations arise because multiple flame stabilization locations are present, associated with the inner and outer shear layers of the annulus, and the stagnation point of the vortex breakdown region. We present results from high-speed luminosity imaging, particle image velocimetry (PIV), and OH-planar laser induced fluorescence (PLIF) to illustrate time-averaged and instantaneous flame shapes and flow fields associated with the different configuration families. Selected cases are compared with large eddy simulations (LES). Particular emphasis is given to the distinctly different flame and flow topologies that exist in these flows, and their sensitivity to geometric (such as centerbody size and shape, combustor diameter, exhaust contraction) and operational (e.g., bulkhead temperature, preheat temperature, fuel/air ratio) parameters. We particularly emphasize the importance of the centerbody shape, and its associated impact on the structure of the central recirculating flow, as differentiating between two different families of flame shapes. Copyright © 2014 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
    corecore