The Impact of Dissonance? A Valuation Perspective on Rural Social Innovation Processes

Social innovation (SI) has been credited with fostering novel solutions to the socio-economic challenges many rural areas face. The quest for a substantiated understanding of its potential for regional development has spawned a rich literature on SI impact assessments. Yet, having been instrumental, these assessments harbour several ambiguities as they seek to unveil objective impacts in a results-oriented manner. First, SI processes take diverse directionalities, questioning the idea of them being ‘straightforward facts’ and giving leeway to a more constructivist understanding. Second, a results-oriented perspective tends to obscure social processes that initially contribute to the emergence of impacts. In response to such concerns, we suggest a valuation perspective that explores how SI impacts are constructed iteratively throughout the innovation process. To do so, we operationalise the notion of dissonance as a critical factor embedded in innovative activities in three instances: impulses, turning points, and lock-ins. This perspective allows us to study how value is experienced, assigned, and strategically attracted while shedding light on how SI processes and their impacts are co-constructed in valuation processes. The article uses empirical vignettes from selected case studies with SI initiatives in Northern Germany.This research has received funding from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (German Federal Ministry of Education and Research) as part of the SOIR project grant number 01UY2211.Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (German Federal Ministry of Education and Research)Peer Reviewe

Energiewenden in Berlin

Die folgenden Beiträge entstanden aus Hausarbeiten, die von Bachelor-Studierenden im Rahmen des Studienprojekts "Die Energiewende in Städten: Praxen, Projekte, Politik" am Institut für Geographie der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin erstellt wurden. Das Studienprojekt fand unter der Leitung von Dr. Timothy Moss im Wintersemester 2016/17 statt

The Impact of Dissonance? A Valuation Perspective on Rural Social Innovation Processes

Social innovation (SI) has been credited with fostering novel solutions to the socio-economic challenges many rural areas face. The quest for a substantiated understanding of its potential for regional development has spawned a rich literature on SI impact assessments. Yet, having been instrumental, these assessments harbour several ambiguities as they seek to unveil objective impacts in a results-oriented manner. First, SI processes take diverse directionalities, questioning the idea of them being ‘straightforward facts’ and giving leeway to a more constructivist understanding. Second, a results-oriented perspective tends to obscure social processes that initially contribute to the emergence of impacts. In response to such concerns, we suggest a valuation perspective that explores how SI impacts are constructed iteratively throughout the innovation process. To do so, we operationalise the notion of dissonance as a critical factor embedded in innovative activities in three instances: impulses, turning points, and lock-ins. This perspective allows us to study how value is experienced, assigned, and strategically attracted while shedding light on how SI processes and their impacts are co-constructed in valuation processes. The article uses empirical vignettes from selected case studies with SI initiatives in Northern Germany