17 research outputs found
Distributive Justice in Intercollegiate Athletics: An Examination of Equality, Revenue Production, and Need
“What makes us strong” – the role of sports clubs in facilitating integration of refugees
Organizational Justice in Sport Organizations: Perceptions of College Athletes and Other College Students
Distributive Justice in Intercollegiate Athletics: Perceptions of Athletic Directors and Athletic Board Chairs
Bases for Determining Need: Perspectives of Intercollegiate Athletic Directors and Athletic Board Chairs
Organizational Justice as a Predictor of Job Satisfaction: An Examination of Head Basketball Coaches
Development of an Instrument to Measure the Moral Judgments of Sport Managers
The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument to measure the moral judgments of sport managers called the Moral Judgments of Sport Managers Instrument (MJSMI). More specifically, our intention was to measure moral judgment on a unidimensional level given past research suggesting moral judgment is a unidimensional construct (Hahm, Beller, & Stoll, 1989; Kohlberg, 1984; Piaget, 1932; Rest, 1979, 1986). The MJSMI contains 8 moral dilemmas/stories in the context of sport management. Sport managers respond to the dilemmas on a four-point Likert scale. Three pilot studies were undertaken to develop the MJSMI. Exploratory factor analysis and internal consistency analysis were the primary methods for assaying reliability and validity. Results consistently showed that sport managers’ responses vary depending on the nature of the moral scenario and thus do not indicate a unidimensional construct. The reasons for inconsistent responses are thoroughly discussed