14 research outputs found
La recherche de la solution équitable en droit international privé
No full textThirlway Hugh. La recherche de la solution équitable en droit international privé. In: Droit international privé : travaux du Comité français de droit international privé, 4e année, 1981-1982. 1985. pp. 79-106
Cour permanente de justice internationale 1922-1945. Volume 5-1: La responsabilité internationale. Volume 5-11: La guerre et la neutralité. Edited by Peter Haggenmacher, Richard Perruchoud and Haritini Dipla. Published under the direction of Lucius Caflisch. Geneva: Publications de l’Institut Universitaire de Hautes Etudes Internationales, 1989. Pp. 1636. Indexes.
No full text
Les engagements internationaux en matière de règlement pacifique des différends entre états. By Photini Pazartzis. Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1992. Pp. xxiv, 340. Index. F 320.
No full text
International Legal Argument in the Permanent Court of International Justice: The Rise of the International Judiciary. By Ole Spiermann. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Pp. xliii, 490. Index. $120, £75.
No full textTerritorial Disputes and Their Resolution in the Recent Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice
No full textDilemma or Chimera?—Admissibility of Illegally Obtained Evidence in International Adjudication
No full text
Uses of International Humanitarian Law by the International Court of Justice: A Critical approach towards its role in the International Legal arena
No full textThe function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) is to decide in accordance with international law such disputes or advisory opinions that are submitted to it. Although the ICJ has consistently applied and contributed to the development of general public international law, in certain areas such as international humanitarian law (IHL), the Court has gone back and forth between authentic contributions and judicial constraint. In other words, while on certain occasions the ICJ has grounded its decisions on IHL, in other cases it deliberately refrained from doing so, arguably due to the subject matter under consideration or to justify a departure from its previous case law. Instead of describing the decisions rendered by the ICJ regarding IHL issues, this chapter portrays how the Court has selectively applied (and refrained from applying) this legal framework. In doing so, the chapter considers certain factors that may explain this behavior and analyzes them in light of its dual role: as a crucial actor in the pacific settlement of international disputes; and in applying international law.Fil: Frenkel, Brian E.. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Green Martínez, Sebastián Axel. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Maisley, Nahuel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentin
