272 research outputs found

    Humanities technologies: research methods and ICT use by humanities researchers

    No full text
    The Academy is conducting a study in 2007-8 – funded through an ARC Linkage grant – to scope the current and emerging uptake of new research technologies and methodologies in the humanities in Australia. The project commenced 8 February 2007 and runs until June 2008. We will present our initial findings on the use of e-research technologies in the humanities sector

    Unsupervised space-time learning in primary visual cortex

    Get PDF
    The mammalian visual system is an incredibly complex computation device, capable of performing the various tasks of seeing: navigation, pattern and object recognition, motor coordination, trajectory extrapolation, among others. Decades of research has shown that experience-dependent plasticity of cortical circuitry underlies the impressive ability to rapidly learn many of these tasks and to adjust as required. One particular thread of investigation has focused on unsupervised learning, wherein changes to the visual environment lead to corresponding changes in cortical circuits. The most prominent example of unsupervised learning is ocular dominance plasticity, caused by visual deprivation to one eye and leading to a dramatic re-wiring of cortex. Other examples tend to make more subtle changes to the visual environment through passive exposure to novel visual stimuli. Here, we use one such unsupervised paradigm, sequence learning, to study experience-dependent plasticity in the mouse visual system. Through a combination of theory and experiment, we argue that the mammalian visual system is an unsupervised learning device. Beginning with a mathematical exploration of unsupervised learning in biology, engineering, and machine learning, we seek a more precise expression of our fundamental hypothesis. We draw connections between information theory, efficient coding, and common unsupervised learning algorithms such as Hebbian plasticity and principal component analysis. Efficient coding suggests a simple rule for transmitting information in the nervous system: use more spikes to encode unexpected information, and fewer spikes to encode expected information. Therefore, expectation violations ought to produce prediction errors, or brief periods of heightened firing when an unexpected event occurs. Meanwhile, modern unsupervised learning algorithms show how such expectations can be learned. Next, we review data from decades of visual neuroscience research, highlighting the computational principles and synaptic plasticity processes that support biological learning and seeing. By tracking the flow of visual information from the retina to thalamus and primary visual cortex, we discuss how the principle of efficient coding is evident in neural activity. One common example is predictive coding in the retina, where ganglion cells with canonical center-surround receptive fields compute a prediction error, sending spikes to the central nervous system only in response to locally-unpredictable visual stimuli. This behavior can be learned through simple Hebbian plasticity mechanisms. Similar models explain much of the activity of neurons in primary visual cortex, but we also discuss ways in which the theory fails to capture the rich biological complexity. Finally, we present novel experimental results from physiological investigations of the mouse primary visual cortex. We trained mice by passively exposing them to complex spatiotemporal patterns of light: rapidly-flashed sequences of images. We find evidence that visual cortex learns these sequences in a manner consistent with efficient coding, such that unexpected stimuli tend to elicit more firing than expected ones. Overall, we observe dramatic changes in evoked neural activity across days of passive exposure. Neural responses to the first, unexpected sequence element increase with days of training while responses at other, expected time points either decrease or stay the same. Furthermore, substituting an unexpected element for an expected one or omitting an expected element both cause brief bursts of increased firing. Our results therefore provide evidence for unsupervised learning and efficient coding in the mouse visual system, especially because unexpected events drive prediction errors. Overall, our analysis suggests novel experiments, which could be performed in the near future, and provides a useful framework to understand visual perception and learning

    God Talk by Professors Within the Classrooms of Public Institutions of Higher Education: What is Constitutionally Permissible?

    Get PDF
    This essay establishes, first, the professional aspects of disclosure. Second, it defines the equipoise between the State\u27s interest in efficiency and the teacher\u27s interest in exercising his or her First Amendment right of expression of religious opinion on matters of public interest. Third, the essay identifies expressive activities of the teacher within the classroom that should be accorded First Amendment protection pursuant to James v. Board of Education. Fourth, the essay examines whether the professor\u27s disclosure of personal and theological biases in a classroom constitutes state action and concludes that a professor fulfilling his or her assigned tasks within the classroom is a state actor. The essay then examines whether the classes of disclosure of personal and theological biases consistent with standards enunciated in James v. Board of Education violate the Establishment Clause. This essay concludes that such disclosure does not run afoul of the Lemon v. Kurtzman test and does not result in the Establishment of religion

    The Ursinus Weekly, January 23, 1969

    Get PDF
    Williams presents Aesthetic Japan • USGA announces students named to Ursinus Board • Cut system modified for failing students • Ursinus obtains Gulf Oil grant • Merck & Co. awards research grant to UC • Final examination schedule • Confrontation: Black vs. white • Editorial: Another chapter in the ongoing inquiry in the higher morality as precepted and pursued on the Ursinus College campus • Letters to the editor • Exchange • Underground films debut at Ursinus • Editorial: Neglected issues • Faculty portrait: Dr. Levie Van Dam • Freeland spirit pervades • Parents O.K. strict rules • Bears drop three, fall to PMC, 61-60 • UC matmen down Albright squad • The President casts a vote for football • Greek gleanings • Committee deliberates on Ursinus centennial • A.C.A.C. initiates graduate services • Placement Office posts interviewshttps://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/weekly/1169/thumbnail.jp

    Surgical results: A justification of the surgeon selection process for the ACAS trial

    Get PDF
    AbstractPurpose: The selection of surgeons to participate in a prospective randomized trial comparing the efficacy of a surgical method with medical management is critically important because it will have a direct impact on the outcome of the study and the future use of the operation. We report the success of the method used for selecting surgeons who participated in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) by examining the surgical morbidity and mortality rates and the outcome of the study.Methods: A Surgical Management Committee established criteria for auditing surgeons who wished to participate in the study. The parameters included a minimum performance of at least 12 carotid endarterectomies (CEA) per year and an audit of each surgeon's last 50 consecutive CEAs with required documentation of a combined neurologic morbidity and mortality rate of <3.0% for asymptomatic patients and <5.0% for all indications including symptomatic patients.Results: As of February 1991, 164 surgeons from 48 medical centers applied for ACAS participation. One hundred seventeen were approved, and their aggregate experience of 5641 operations yielded a combined neurologic morbidity and mortality rate of 2.3% for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients combined. The morbidity and mortality rate for CEA on asymptomatic patients was 1.7%. These surgeons, plus those recruited after February 1991, became investigators in the ACAS trial and were responsible for the surgical care of 825 patients who were randomized to the surgical arm. Seven hundred twenty-four patients actually underwent CEA. One patient (0.14%) died and ten patients (1.38%) had strokes within the 30-day perioperative interval, for a combined stroke or death incidence of 1.52%. The 5-year stroke event rate in the surgical group (including perioperative morbidity and mortality rates) was 5.1%, compared with 11% of patients treated medically, yielding a relative risk reduction of 53% in favor of surgery ( p =0.004).Conclusions: A method for selecting surgeons for participation in the ACAS trial was successful in providing low perioperative morbidity and mortality rates. This materially influenced the outcome of the study in favor of CEA. (J VASC SURG 1996;23:323-8.
    • …
    corecore