Body composition in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis subjects and its effect on disease progression and survival

BACKGROUND: Motor neuron degeneration and malnutrition alter body composition in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Resulting losses of weight, fat mass (FM), and fat-free mass (FFM) shorten survival. Nutritional management relies on body weight or BMI; neither reliably indicates malnutrition nor differentiates body compartments. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to 1) develop an equation to compute FM and FFM using clinical data, validated against DXA; and 2) examine the effect of computed FM and FFM on disease course and survival. METHODS: We studied 364 ALS patients from 3 cohorts. In Cohort #1 we used logistic regression on clinical and demographic data to create an equation (test cohort). In Cohort #2 we validated FM and FFM computed using this equation against DXA (validation cohort). In Cohort #3, we examined the effect of computed body composition on disease course and survival. RESULTS: In Cohort #1 (n = 29) the model incorporated sex, age, BMI, and bulbar-onset to create an equation to estimate body fat: % body fat = 1.73 - [19.80*gender (1 if male or 0 if female)] + [0.25*weight (kg)] + [0.95*BMI (kg/m2)] - (5.20*1 if bulbar-onset or *0 if limb-onset). In Cohort #2 (n = 104), body composition using this equation, compared to other published equations, showed the least variance from DXA values. In Cohort #3 (n = 314), loss of body composition over 6 mo was greater in males. Adjusted survival was predicted by low baseline FM (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.80), and loss of FM (HR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.30, 2.69) and FFM (HR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.49) over 6 mo. CONCLUSIONS: Our equation broadens the traditional nutritional evaluation in clinics and reliably estimates body composition. Measuring body composition could target FM as a focus for nutritional management to ensure adequate energy intake and complement measures, such as the ALS functional rating scale-revised score and forced vital capacity, currently used

Thymectomy may not be associated with clinical improvement in MuSK myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION: A randomized trial demonstrated benefit from thymectomy in nonthymomatous acetylcholine receptor (AChR)-antibody positive myasthenia gravis (MG). Uncontrolled observational and histologic studies suggest thymectomy may not be efficacious in anti-muscle-specific kinase (MuSK)-MG. METHODS: The therapeutic impact of thymectomy was evaluated from data collected for a multicenter, retrospective blinded review of rituximab in MuSK-MG. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between thymectomy (n = 26) and nonthymectomy (n = 29) groups, including treatment with rituximab (42% vs. 45%). At last visit, 35% of thymectomy subjects reached the primary endpoint, a Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) post-intervention status (PIS) score of minimal manifestations (MM) or better, compared with 55% of controls (P = 0.17). After controlling for age at onset of MG, rituximab, prednisone, and intravenous immunoglobulin/plasma exchange treatment, thymectomy was not associated with greater likelihood of favorable clinical outcome (odds ratio = 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.12-1.53, P = 0.19). DISCUSSION: Thymectomy was not associated with additional clinical improvement in this multicenter cohort of MuSK-MG patients. Muscle Nerve 59:404-410, 2019