If we build it they will come: targeting the immune response to breast cancer.

Historically, breast cancer tumors have been considered immunologically quiescent, with the majority of tumors demonstrating low lymphocyte infiltration, low mutational burden, and modest objective response rates to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Tumor and immunologic profiling has shed light on potential mechanisms of immune evasion in breast cancer, as well as unique aspects of the tumor microenvironment (TME). These include elements associated with antigen processing and presentation as well as immunosuppressive elements, which may be targeted therapeutically. Examples of such therapeutic strategies include efforts to (1) expand effector T-cells, natural killer (NK) cells and immunostimulatory dendritic cells (DCs), (2) improve antigen presentation, and (3) decrease inhibitory cytokines, tumor-associated M2 macrophages, regulatory T- and B-cells and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). The goal of these approaches is to alter the TME, thereby making breast tumors more responsive to immunotherapy. In this review, we summarize key developments in our understanding of antitumor immunity in breast cancer, as well as emerging therapeutic modalities that may leverage that understanding to overcome immunologic resistance

Abstract B049: Radiogenomic profiling of prostate tumors prior to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) converges on a transcriptomic signature of TGF-beta activity driving tumor recurrence

Abstract Background: In patients who receive definitive therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer, biochemical recurrence is due to local recurrence and/or the presence of undetected metastatic disease at the time of initial diagnosis and treatment. Approximately 25-40% of patients who receive radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with curative intent are expected to recur within 5-10 years. We hypothesized that applying multiparametric (mp) MRI, gene expression, and genomic analyses to prostate tumors prior to EBRT+ADT would identify biomarkers predictive of recurrence (NCT01834001). Methods: At baseline and 6 months after completion of radiotherapy, mpMRI was performed and lesions were manually contoured. MR/ultrasound-fusion biopsies acquired at baseline targeted to up to three distinct MR lesions per patient. 29 patients with intermediate and high risk localized prostate cancer treated with EBRT+ADT with sufficient baseline biopsy tissue were selected for this analysis (median follow-up: 91 months). Tumor tissues were macrodissected to obtain DNA and RNA from 60 distinct biopsy regions (1-4 per patient). DNA was used for generating whole-exome sequencing libraries (92.5 × median coverage); RNA was converted into cDNA and hybridized to Affymetrix Human Exon 1.0 microarrays. Secondary gene expression cohorts with clinical annotation were obtained from the University of Miami and Queen’s University Belfast. Gene expression signatures were processed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) and the Decipher GRID. Results: Five of the 29 patients experienced biochemical failure by the time of data analysis; four of these patients were identified to have distant metastases with no evidence of local recurrence at the time of biochemical failure. Baseline and posttreatment lesion volumes by MRI and posttreatment ADCmax (apparent diffusion coefficient) were positively associated with recurrence (p<0.05). The Decipher signature positively correlated with these three MR features. Comparison of gene expression using a linear mixed-effect model identified 1,120 differentially expressed transcripts. IPA nominated TGF-beta signaling as the topmost enriched upstream regulator (z=3.32). This result was validated in the Miami (z=2.54) and Belfast (z=3.67) cohorts. By network analysis, genes that independently tracked with the baseline and posttreatment volumes and posttreatment ADCmax MR features similarly converged to the TGF-beta pathway. Co-occurrence of biallelic TP53 alterations with 1- or 2-copy PTEN losses was observed exclusively in patients who recurred. Conclusions: Genomic, transcriptomic and radiomic analyses have nominated predictive biomarkers that identify the subset of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer destined to recur after definitive EBRT+ADT. Identification of molecular features predictive of failure suggests that aggressive pre-existing subclones harboring these alterations have metastatic potential. Emerging systemic therapies including TGF-beta ligand traps targeted to these tumors may improve overall outcomes. Citation Format: Adam G. Sowalsky, Anson T. Ku, Uma Shankavaram, Shana Y. Trostel, Houssein A. Sater, Stephanie A. Harmon, Nicole V. Carrabba, Yang Liu, Radka Stoyanova, Elai Davicioni, Alan Pollack, Baris Turkbey, Deborah E. Citrin. Radiogenomic profiling of prostate tumors prior to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) converges on a transcriptomic signature of TGF-beta activity driving tumor recurrence [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Advances in Prostate Cancer Research; 2023 Mar 15-18; Denver, Colorado. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B049

Radiogenomic profiling of prostate tumors prior to external beam radiotherapy converges on a transcriptomic signature of TGF-β activity driving tumor recurrence

Background: Patients with localized prostate cancer have historically been assigned to clinical risk groups based on local disease extent, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), and tumor grade. Clinical risk grouping is used to determine the intensity of treatment with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), yet a substantial proportion of patients with intermediate and high risk localized prostate cancer will develop biochemical recurrence (BCR) and require salvage therapy. Prospective identification of patients destined to experience BCR would allow treatment intensification or selection of alternative therapeutic strategies. Methods: Twenty-nine individuals with intermediate or high risk prostate cancer were prospectively recruited to a clinical trial designed to profile the molecular and imaging features of prostate cancer in patients undergoing EBRT and ADT. Whole transcriptome cDNA microarray and whole exome sequencing was performed on pretreatment targeted biopsy of prostate tumors (n=60). All patients underwent pretreatment and 6-month post EBRT multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), and were followed with serial PSA to assess presence or absence of BCR. Genes differentially expressed in the tumor of patients with and without BCR were investigated using pathways analysis tools and were similarly explored in alternative datasets. Differential gene expression and predicted pathway activation were evaluated in relation to tumor response on mpMRI and tumor genomic profile. A novel TGF-β gene signature was developed in the discovery dataset and applied to a validation dataset. Findings: Baseline MRI lesion volume and PTEN/TP53 status in prostate tumor biopsies correlated with the activation state of TGF-β signaling measured using pathway analysis. All three measures correlated with the risk of BCR after definitive RT. A prostate cancer-specific TGF-β signature discriminated between patients that experienced BCR vs. those that did not. The signature retained prognostic utility in an independent cohort. Interpretation: TGF-β activity is a dominant feature of intermediate-to-unfavorable risk prostate tumors prone to biochemical failure after EBRT with ADT. TGF-β activity may serve as a prognostic biomarker independent of existing risk factors and clinical decision-making criteria. Funding: This research was supported by the Prostate Cancer Foundation, the Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program, National Cancer Institute, and the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research

Phase I study of a multitargeted recombinant Ad5 PSA/MUC-1/brachyury-based immunotherapy vaccine in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

Antitumor vaccines targeting tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) can generate antitumor immune response. A novel vaccine platform using adenovirus 5 (Ad5) vectors [E1-, E2b-] targeting three TAAs-prostate-specific antigen (PSA), brachyury, and MUC-1-has been developed. Both brachyury and the C-terminus of MUC-1 are overexpressed in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and have been shown to play an important role in resistance to chemotherapy, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and metastasis. The transgenes for PSA, brachyury, and MUC-1 all contain epitope modifications for the expression of CD8+ T-cell enhancer agonist epitopes. We report here the first-in-human trial of this vaccine platform. Patients with mCRPC were given concurrently three vaccines targeting PSA, brachyury, and MUC-1 at 5×10 viral particles (VP) each, subcutaneously every 3 weeks for a maximum of three doses (dose de-escalation cohort), followed by a booster vaccine every 8 weeks for 1 year (dose-expansion cohort only). The primary objective was to determine the safety and the recommended phase II dose. Immune assays and clinical responses were evaluated. Eighteen patients with mCRPC were enrolled between July 2018 and September 2019 and received at least one vaccination. Median PSA was 25.58 ng/mL (range, 0.65-1006 ng/mL). The vaccine was tolerable and safe, and no grade >3 treatment-related adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. One patient had a partial response, while five patients had confirmed PSA decline and five had stable disease for >6 months. Median progression-free survival was 22 weeks (95% CI: 19.1 to 34). Seventeen (100%) of 17 patients mounted T-cell responses to at least one TAA, whereras 8 (47%) of 17 patients mounted immune responses to all three TAAs. Multifunctional T-cell responses to PSA, MUC-1, and brachyury were also detected after vaccination in the majority of the patients. Ad5 PSA/MUC-1/brachyury vaccine is well tolerated. The primary end points were met and there were no DLTs. The recommended phase II dose is 5×10  VP. The vaccine demonstrated clinical activity, including one partial response and confirmed PSA responses in five patients. Three patients with prolonged PSA responses received palliative radiation therapy. Further research is needed to evaluate the clinical benefit and immunogenicity of this vaccine in combination with other immuno-oncology agents and/or palliative radiation therapy. NCT03481816

Phase I Trial of a Modified Vaccinia Ankara Priming Vaccine Followed by a Fowlpox Virus Boosting Vaccine Modified to Express Brachyury and Costimulatory Molecules in Advanced Solid Tumors

Lessons Learned Modified vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN)-Brachyury followed by fowlpox virus-BN-Brachyury was well tolerated upon administration to patients with advanced cancer. Sixty-three percent of patients developed CD4+ and/or CD8+ T-cell responses to brachyury after vaccination. BN-Brachyury vaccine also induced T-cell responses against CEA and MUC1, which are cascade antigens, that is, antigens not encoded in the vaccines. Background Brachyury, a transcription factor, plays an integral role in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, metastasis, and tumor resistance to chemotherapy. It is expressed in many tumor types, and rarely in normal tissues, making it an ideal immunologic target. Bavarian Nordic (BN)-Brachyury consists of vaccination with modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) priming followed by fowlpox virus (FPV) boosting, each encoding transgenes for brachyury and costimulatory molecules. Methods Patients with metastatic solid tumors were treated with two monthly doses of MVA-brachyury s.c., 8 x 10(8) infectious units (IU), followed by FPV-brachyury s.c., 1 x 10(9) IU, for six monthly doses and then every 3 months for up to 2 years. The primary objective was to determine safety and tolerability. Results Eleven patients were enrolled from March 2018 to July 2018 (one patient was nonevaluable). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The most common treatment-related adverse event was grade 1/2 injection-site reaction observed in all patients. Best overall response was stable disease in six patients, and the 6-month progression-free survival rate was 50%. T cells against brachyury and cascade antigens CEA and MUC1 were detected in the majority of patients. Conclusion BN-Brachyury vaccine is well tolerated and induces immune responses to brachyury and cascade antigens and demonstrates some evidence of clinical benefit

Abstract OT1-08-01: A phase Ib trial of sequential combinations of BN-brachyury, entinostat, ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and bintrafusp alfa (M7824) in advanced stage breast cancer (BrEAsT)

Abstract Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) monotherapy has produced limited benefit in breast cancer (BC) with response rates (RR) ranging from 5 to 23%. Combination ICB improved RR and progression free survival (PFS) resulting in atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel receiving FDA accelerated approval for programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive, triple negative breast cancers (TNBC). BC has historically been considered immunologically quiet with most having a low mutational burden, low PD-L1 expression, defective antigen presentation machinery, and immuosuppressive signals in the tumor microenvironment (TME). An approach using a combination of immuno-oncology (IO) agents including ICB, immunomodulators and vaccines may shift the TME to allow for improved antigen presentation, the release of immunostimulatory cytokines, more immunogenic cell death and increased PD-L1 expression. The transcription factor brachyury plays an important role in breast tumor plasticity. High brachyury expression is associated with treatment resistance and a worse prognosis. Entinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that has activity in multiple breast cancer subtypes. Preclinical data demonstrates entinostat upregulates MHC, enhances immune-mediated lysis and upregulates PD-L1 expression through epigenetic modification. Bintrafusp alfa is a bifunctional protein composed of the extracellular domain of the TGF-βRII receptor (TGF-β“trap”) fused to a human IgG1. Preclinical data shows bintrafusp alpha treatment increases T-cell trafficking, antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell lysis and NK cell activation. Monotherapy clinical studies with these agents have produced modest results in solid tumors, including BC. Preclinical data evaluating combinations of these agents shows a reduction in in tumor size, improved antigen-specific T-cell responses, reduced regulatory T cells, increased CD8+T-cells, and increased PD-L1 expression. We propose the stepwise addition of BN-Brachyury, Bintrafusp alfa, T-DM1 and Entinostat in advanced BC. This phase Ib study will assess efficacy and safety of the regimen and has three cohorts: Cohort 1(TNBC) will receive BN-Brachyury + Bintrafusp alfa. Cohort 2 (HER2+) will receive T-DM1 + BN-Brachyury + Bintrafusp alfa +/- entinostat. After safety is established in Cohort 2, patients in Cohort 3 (HER2+) will be assigned to receive T-DM1 + BN-Brachyury + Bintrafusp alfa +/- entinostat. Responses are evaluated every 2 cycles (6 weeks). Patients in Cohorts 2 and 3 will undergo research biopsies -baseline and after 2 cycles to evaluate changes within TME. Peripheral immune responses will be evaluated at selected time points. All patients must have measurable disease and HER2+ patients must have biopsiable disease. >1 prior treatment is required. Asymptomatic or brain metastases treated > 6 weeks are allowed. Well controlled HIV, HBV or treated HCV is allowed. Exclusion criteria include symptomatic brain metastases or clinically significant bleeding (<3 months from study entry). Co-primary objectives are RR and safety. Secondary objectives include PFS and changes in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (Cohorts 2 and 3). Exploratory analyses include changes in immune cells and cytokines in the peripheral blood. Analyses performed will be descriptive, reporting the outcome measure for each treatment arm indicated along with two-tailed 80% and 95% confidence intervals. All cohorts employ a safety assessment in the initial 6 patients and a Simon minimax 2-stage design for clinical efficacy. We plan to recruit 51 patients: 13 patients with TNBC, 38 patients with HER2+BC. This trial will open Fall 2019 at the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD). For more information contact the PI, [email protected]. Citation Format: Margaret E Gatti-Mays, Claudia Palena, Sofia R Gameiro, Renee N Donahue, Caroline Jochems, Seth Steinberg, Stan Lipkowitz, Alexandra Zimmer, Deneise Francis, Julius Strauss, Houssein Abdul Sater, Lisa Cordes, Jason Redman, Fatima Karzai, Marijo Bilusic, Ravi A Madan, James L Gulley, Jeffrey Schlom. A phase Ib trial of sequential combinations of BN-brachyury, entinostat, ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and bintrafusp alfa (M7824) in advanced stage breast cancer (BrEAsT) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-08-01

A Phase I Trial Using a Multitargeted Recombinant Adenovirus 5 (CEA/MUC1/Brachyury)-Based Immunotherapy Vaccine Regimen in Patients with Advanced Cancer

Lessons Learned Concurrent ETBX-011, ETBX-051, and ETBX-061 can be safely administered to patients with advanced cancer. All patients developed CD4(+) and/or CD8(+) T-cell responses after vaccination to at least one tumor-associated antigen (TAA) encoded by the vaccine; 5/6 patients (83%) developed MUC1-specific T cells, 4/6 (67%) developed CEA-specific T cells, and 3/6 (50%) developed brachyury-specific T cells. The presence of adenovirus 5-neutralizing antibodies did not prevent the generation of TAA-specific T cells. Background A novel adenovirus-based vaccine targeting three human tumor-associated antigens-CEA, MUC1, and brachyury-has demonstrated antitumor cytolytic T-cell responses in preclinical animal models of cancer. Methods This open-label, phase I trial evaluated concurrent administration of three therapeutic vaccines (ETBX-011 = CEA, ETBX-051 = MUC1, and ETBX-061 = brachyury). All three vaccines used the same modified adenovirus 5 (Ad5) vector backbone and were administered at a single dose level (DL) of 5 x 10(11) viral particles (VP) per vector. The vaccine regimen consisting of all three vaccines was given every 3 weeks for three doses then every 8 weeks for up to 1 year. Clinical and immune responses were evaluated. Results Ten patients enrolled on trial (DL1 = 6 with 4 in the DL1 expansion cohort). All treatment-related adverse events were temporary, self-limiting, grade 1/2 and included injection site reactions and flu-like symptoms. Antigen-specific T cells to MUC1, CEA, and/or brachyury were generated in all patients. There was no evidence of antigenic competition. The administration of the vaccine regimen produced stable disease as the best clinical response. Conclusion Concurrent ETBX-011, ETBX-051, and ETBX-061 can be safely administered to patients with advanced cancer. Further studies of the vaccine regimen in combination with other agents, including immune checkpoint blockade, are planned

A phase 1 open label trial of intravenous administration of MVA-BN-Brachyury vaccine in patients with advanced cancer

Abstract only 2617 Background: Brachyury is a member of the T-box family of transcription factors which is overexpressed in several tumor types and has been associated with treatment resistance, epithelial to mesenchymal transition and metastatic potential. MVA-BN-Brachyury vaccine is a vector-based therapeutic cancer vaccine which demonstrated immunogenicity and safety in previous clinical trials. Preclinical studies suggested that IV administration of vaccines can induce superior CD8 + T-cell responses as compared with SC or IM routes. This is the first-in-human study to evaluate safety and tolerability of IV administration of this vaccine. Methods: Patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced malignant solid tumors were treated with MVA-BN-Brachyury vaccine in a phase 1, open-label, 3+3 dose-escalation study. Eligible patients received a total of three vaccine doses intravenously Q3W at 1x10 7 (DL1), 1x10 8 (DL2), or 1x10 9 infections units (Inf.U) (DL3). Patients were admitted for 48 hours for observation after each dose and had imaging at baseline and 1 and 3 months after the last vaccine dose. Primary objective was to determine the safety and tolerability and establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Immune assays were performed in the first 10 enrolled patients. Results: In 13 patients (10 chordoma, 1 small cell breast, 1 prostate, 1 colorectal cancer), no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Right upper quadrant abdominal pain was the only grade 3 TRAE. All other TRAEs were grade 1 or 2; most common was cytokine release syndrome (four grade 2 and one grade 1. As of Feb 2021, 9 patients completed treatment and two planned restaging scans: 5 patients had PD (3 in DL1 and 2 in DL2), 3 had SD (2 in DL2 and 1 in DL3) and 1 had PR (DL3) as their best treatment response per RECIST 1.1. One patient with advanced sacral chordoma had significant reduction of ulcerated skin metastases after 2 doses, followed by 33% shrinkage at the end of trial. Two chordoma patients with SD reported significant pain improvement. Multifunctional Brachyury, CEA, and MUC1 specific T cells were increased after vaccination in in 60%, 67%, and 50% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: MVA-BN-Brachyury IV vaccine is safe across all tested dose levels and suggesting activity in chordoma at DL3 for which this vaccine was granted FDA orphan drug designation. Mild cytokine release syndrome (rigors, chills, fever and hypotension) has been observed in 5 patients and managed with IV fluids and steroids in 2 patients. A dose 1 x 10 9 Inf.U (DL3) was selected for RP2D based upon available safety data. Further research is pending to evaluate clinical benefit and immunogenicity. Clinical trial information: NCT04134312