Job Growth and the Quality of Jobs in the U.S. Economy

During the 1980's employment grew rapidly in the United States, prompting many analysts to label the U.S. economy the great American job machine. But while aggregate employment increased rapidly during the 1980's, many did not benefit from the expansion. Among less educated prime-age males, unemployment rates rose and labor force participation rates declined sharply. Moreover, although job growth was high, many argued that the quality of American jobs as measured by wages, benefits, and job security deteriorated. The decline of jobs in the high-paying manufacturing sector and the growth of jobs in the low-paying services sector, the growth in part-time and temporary employment, and the general decline in real wages among less-educated, less-skilled workers have been presented as evidence of an erosion in job quality. The issue of job growth and job quality in the American economy has sparked extensive debate among policymakers and academics over the last decade. The aim of this paper is to critically examine the evidence on job growth and on wages and other indicators of job quality in the U.S. economy during the 1980's and 1990's. To place the American experience in perspective, selected comparisons are made to the experiences in other industrialized countries. The paper is divided into three main sections. In section 1, I look at employment growth in the United States during the 1980's and 1990's. I examine whether and to what extent employment growth was greater in the United States than in other industrialized countries and whether strong employment growth in the United States signaled a healthy economy. I compare the employment performance of the U.S. economy during the 1980's with that in other industrialized countries, and study the factors underlying the cross-country differences in employment growth: differences in the growth of the working age population, differences in the growth in labor force participation, and differences in the growth in unemployment. I also examine differences in the employment experiences across groups of workers defined by gender, education, and age within the United States. In addition, the relation between employment growth, productivity growth, and growth in per capita GDP in the United States and other industrialized countries during the 1980's is explored. Finally, trends in employment growth in the United States during the 1990's are discussed. In sections 2 and 3 of the paper, I examine whether and in what sense there is any evidence that the quality of jobs in the United States has declined. The literature pertaining to trends in the quality of jobs in the U.S. economy falls into at least two main categories: (1) studies of the wage, benefits, and job security characteristics of new jobs created; and (2) studies of trends in real wages, benefits, and earnings inequality. The latter deals with trends in new as well as existing jobs. In section 2 of the paper, I review evidence from several studies on the wage distribution of occupations and industries in which new employment was created during the 1980's and 1990's. I also look at trends in the growth of involuntary part-time employment and temporary employment, which are characterized by low wages, few benefits, and little job security. In section 3 of the paper, I present evidence on trends in wages and benefits across groups of workers and the growth of wage inequality in the United States during the 1980's and 1990's. I review evidence concerning the causes of the decline in real wages among less-educated workers and the growth in wage inequality in the United States. I also review evidence from studies of trends in real wages and wage inequality in other industrialized countries and discuss why trends abroad typically have differed from those in the United States. In section 4, I summarize the evidence on job growth and the quality of jobs in the United States during the 1980's and 1990's and discuss the implications for U.S. policy.job, growth, quality, expansion, Houseman

Do temporary jobs help low-skilled workers? : surprising data from Detroit

Because Detroit randomly assigns its welfare-to-work clients to different contractors — some favoring temporary jobs, some not — the researchers were able to uncover surprising data on whether temping helps the disadvantaged build careers.Temporary employees ; Public welfare

Does Employment Protection Inhibit Labor Market Flexibility? Lessons from Germany, France and Belgium

Laws in most West European countries give workers strong job rights, including the right to advance notice of layoff and the right to severance pay or other compensation if laid off. Many of these same countries also encourage hours adjustment in lieu of layoffs by providing prorated unemployment compensation to workers on reduced hours. This paper compares the adjustment of manufacturing employment and hours in West Germany, France and Belgium, three countries with strong job security regulations and well-established short-time compensation systems, with that in the United States. Although the adjustment of employment to changes in output is much slower in the German, French and Belgian manufacturing sectors than in U.S. manufacturing, the adjustment of total hours worked is much more similar. The short-time system makes a significant contribution to observed adjustment in all three European countries. In addition, we find little evidence that the weakening of job security regulations that occurred in Germany, France and Belgium during the 1980s affected employers' adjustment to changes in output. These findings suggest that, given appropriate supporting institutions, strong job security need not inhibit employer adjustment to changing conditions.labor, market, flexibility, Europe, France, Belgium, Germany, Abraham, Houseman

Understanding the Decline of U.S. Manufacturing Employment

U.S. manufacturing experienced a precipitous and historically unprecedented decline in employment in the 2000s. Many economists and other analysts—pointing to decades of statistics showing that manufacturing real (inflation-adjusted) output growth has largely kept pace with private sector real output growth, that productivity growth has been much higher, and that the sector’s share of aggregate employment has been declining—argue that manufacturing’s job losses are largely the result of productivity growth (assumed to reflect automation) and are part of a long-term trend. Since the 1980s, however, the apparently robust growth in manufacturing real output and productivity have been driven by a relatively small industry—computer and electronic products, whose extraordinary performance reflects the way statistical agencies account for rapid product improvements in the industry. Without the computer industry, there is no prima facie evidence that productivity caused manufacturing’s relative and absolute employment decline. This paper discusses interpreting labor productivity statistics, which capture many factors besides automation, and cautions against using descriptive evidence to draw causal inferences. It also reviews the research literature to date, which finds that trade significantly contributed to the collapse of manufacturing employment in the 2000s, but finds little evidence of a causal link to automation