Analyzing international medical graduate research productivity for application to US neurosurgery residency and beyond: A survey of applicants, program directors, and institutional experience

BackgroundThe authors investigated perceived discrepancies between the neurosurgical research productivity of international medical graduates (IMGs) and US medical graduates (USMGs) through the perspective of program directors (PDs) and successfully matched IMGs.MethodsResponses to 2 separate surveys on neurosurgical applicant research productivity in 115 neurosurgical programs and their PDs were analyzed. Neurosurgical research participation was analyzed using an IMG survey of residents who matched into neurosurgical residency within the previous 8 years. Productivity of IMGs conducting dedicated research at the study institution was also analyzed.ResultsThirty-two of 115 (28%) PDs responded to the first research productivity survey and 43 (37%) to the second IMG research survey. PDs expected neurosurgery residency applicants to spend a median of 12–24 months on research (Q1-Q3: 0–12 to 12–24; minimum time: 0–24; maximum time: 0–48) and publish a median of 5 articles (Q1-Q3: 2–5 to 5–10; minimum number: 0–10; maximum number: 4–20). Among 43 PDs, 34 (79%) ranked “research institution or associated personnel” as the most important factor when evaluating IMGs' research. Forty-two of 79 (53%) IMGs responding to the IMG-directed survey reported a median of 30 months (Q1-Q3: 18–48; range: 4–72) of neurosurgical research and 12 published articles (Q1-Q3: 6–24; range: 1–80) before beginning neurosurgical residency. Twenty-two PDs (69%) believed IMGs complete more research than USMGs before residency. Of 20 IMGs conducting dedicated neuroscience/neurosurgery research at the study institution, 16 of 18 who applied matched or entered a US neurosurgical training program; 2 applied and entered a US neurosurgical clinical fellowship.ConclusionThe research work of IMGs compared to USMGs who apply to neurosurgery residency exceeds PDs' expectations regarding scientific output and research time. Many PDs perceive IMG research productivity before residency application as superior to USMGs. Although IMGs comprise a small percentage of trainees, they are responsible for a significant amount of US-published neurosurgical literature. Preresidency IMG research periods may be improved with dedicated mentoring and advising beginning before the research period, during the period, and within a neurosurgery research department, providing a formal structure such as a research fellowship or graduate program for IMGs aspiring to train in the US

Toward bigger data for neurosurgical anatomical research: a single centralized quantitative neurosurgical anatomy platform

Quantitative neurosurgical anatomy research aims to produce surgically applicable knowledge for improving operative decision-making using measurements from anatomical dissection and tools such as stereotaxis. Although such studies attempt to answer similar research questions, there is little standardization between them, offering minimal comparability. Modern technology has been incorporated into the research methodology, but many scientific principles are lacking, and results are not broadly applicable or suitable for evaluating big-data trends. Advances in information technology and the concept of big data permit more accessible and robust means of producing valuable, standardized, reliable research. A technology project, Inchin, is presented to address these needs for neurosurgical anatomy research. This study applies the concept of big data to neurosurgical anatomy research, specifically in quantifying surgical metrics. A remote-hosted web application was developed for computing standard neurosurgical metrics and storing measurement data. An online portal (Inchin) was developed to produce a database to facilitate and promote neurosurgical anatomical research, applying optimal scientific methodology and big-data principles to this recent and evolving field of research. Individual data sets are not insignificant, but a collective of data sets present advantages. Large data sets allow confidence in data trends that are usually obscured in smaller numbers of samples. Inchin, a single centralized software platform, can act as a global database of results of neurosurgical anatomy studies. A calculation tool ensuring standardized peer-reviewed methodology, Inchin is applied to the analysis of neurosurgical metrics and may promote efficient study collaboration within and among neurosurgical laboratories

Quantitative Anatomic Comparison of the Extreme Lateral Transodontoid vs Extreme Medial Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches to the Jugular Foramen and Craniovertebral Junction

BACKGROUND: Large, destructive intracranial and extracranial lesions at the jugular foramen (JF) and anterior craniovertebral junction (CVJ) are among the most challenging lesions to resect. OBJECTIVE: To compare the extreme lateral transodontoid approach (ELTOA) with the extreme medial endoscopic endonasal approach (EMEEA) to determine the most effective surgical approach to the JF and CVJ. METHODS: Seven formalin-fixed cadaveric heads were dissected. Using neuronavigation, we quantitatively measured and compared the exposure of the intracranial and extracranial neurovascular structures, the drilled area of the clivus and the C1 vertebra, and the area of exposure of the brainstem. RESULTS: The mean total drilled area of the clivus was greater with the EMEEA than with the ELTOA (1043.5 vs 909.4 mm 2 , P = .02). The EMEEA provided a longer exposure of the extracranial cranial nerves (CNs) IX, X, and XI compared with the ELTOA (cranial nerve [CN] IX: 18.8 vs 12.0 mm, P = .01; CN X: 19.2 vs 10.4 mm, P = .003; and CN XI, 18.1 vs 11.9 mm, P = .04). The EMEEA, compared with the ELTOA, provided a significantly greater area of exposure of the contralateral ventromedial medulla (289.5 vs 80.9 mm 2 , P \u3c .001) and pons (237.5 vs 86.2 mm 2 , P = .005) but less area of exposure of the ipsilateral dorsolateral medulla (51.5 vs 205.8 mm 2 , P = .008). CONCLUSION: The EMEEA and ELTOA provide optimal exposures to different aspects of the CVJ and JF. A combination of these approaches can compensate for their disadvantages and achieve significant exposure

Improving the metric of surgical freedom in the laboratory based on a novel concept of volume

BACKGROUND: In laboratory-based neuroanatomical studies, surgical freedom, the most important metric of instrument maneuverability, has been based on Heron\u27s formula. Inaccuracies and limitations hinder this study design\u27s applicability. A new methodology, volume of surgical freedom (VSF), may produce a more realistic qualitative and quantitative representation of a surgical corridor. METHODS: Overall, 297 data set measurements assessing surgical freedom were completed for cadaveric brain neurosurgical approach dissections. Heron\u27s formula and VSF were calculated specifically to different surgical anatomical targets. Quantitative accuracy and the results of an analysis of human error were compared. RESULTS: Heron\u27s formula for irregularly shaped surgical corridors resulted in overestimation of the respective areas (minimum overestimation 31.3%). In 92% (188/204) of data sets reviewed for influence of offset, areas calculated on the basis of measured data points were larger than areas calculated on the basis of the translated best-fit plane points (mean [SD] overestimation of 2.14% [2.62%]). Variability in the probe length attributable to human error was small (mean [SD] calculated probe length 190.26 mm [5.57 mm]). CONCLUSIONS: VSF is an innovative concept that can develop a model of a surgical corridor producing better assessment and prediction of the ability to maneuver and manipulate surgical instruments. VSF corrects for deficits in Heron\u27s method by generating the correct area for an irregular shape using the shoelace formula, adjusting the data points to account for offset, and attempting to correct for human error. VSF produces 3-dimensional models and, therefore, is a preferable standard for assessing surgical freedom

Transorbital Neuroendoscopic Surgery as a Mainstream Neurosurgical Corridor: A Systematic Review

Background: Transorbital neuroendoscopic surgery (TONES) offers a new level of minimally invasive, minimally disfiguring skull base surgery with maximal surgical visualization. Methods: This review systematically assesses the body of published anatomic (cadaveric) and clinical evidence for the approach. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase were systematically searched for articles in which the TONES surgical technique was used in an anatomic, clinical, or combined study. The outcomes of interest included identification of the diseases, operative outcomes, and complication rates. Results: Twenty-three articles were selected for this systematic review: 10 were purely anatomic, 10 were clinical, and 3 had both clinical and cadaveric components. The articles reported 69 patients undergoing transorbital or combined transorbital and transnasal intervention. A total of 30 cases of cerebrospinal fluid leak were documented; of these, 28 (93%) had successful resolution, 2 (7%) had recurrence, and 5 (15%) experienced complications. A total of 31 tumors were biopsied (n = 1), resected (n = 22), or debulked (n = 8). Meningiomas were the most common lesion managed via TONES, with 5 of 7 patients with meningioma who reported preoperative neurologic deficits experiencing an improvement in extraocular movement impairment, visual acuity, proptosis, and ptosis. Transient postoperative clinical sequelae, including diplopia and ptosis, were increasingly associated with the superior lid crease incision and the sole transorbital approach. Conclusions: TONES is a significant development in transorbital skull base surgery. However, comprehensive, robust, comparative analyses and increasing use and generalizability of this technique in skull base surgery are awaited

Comparative analysis of the combined petrosal and the pretemporal transcavernous anterior petrosal approach to the petroclival region

OBJECTIVE: The combined petrosal (CP) approach has been traditionally used to resect petroclival meningioma (PCM). The pretemporal transcavernous anterior petrosal (PTAP) approach has emerged as an alternative. A quantitative comparison of both approaches has not been made. This anatomical study compared the surgical corridors afforded by both approaches and identified key elements of the approach selection process. METHODS: Twelve cadaveric specimens were dissected, and 10 were used for morphometric analysis. Groups A and B (n = 5 in each) underwent the CP and PTAP approaches, respectively. The area of drilled clivus, lengths of cranial nerves (CNs) II-X, length of posterior circulation vessels, surgical area of exposure of the brainstem, and angles of attack anterior and posterior to a common target were measured and compared. RESULTS: The area of drilled clivus was significantly greater in group A than group B (mean ± SD 88.7 ± 17.1 mm2 vs 48.4 ± 17.9 mm2, p \u3c 0.01). Longer segments of ipsilateral CN IV (52.4 ± 2.33 mm vs 46.5 ± 3.71 mm, p \u3c 0.02), CN IX, and CN X (9.91 ± 3.21 mm vs 0.00 ± 0.00 mm, p \u3c 0.01) were exposed in group A than group B. Shorter portions of CN II (9.31 ± 1.28 mm vs 17.6 ± 6.89 mm, p \u3c 0.02) and V1 (26.9 ± 4.62 mm vs 32.4 ± 1.93 mm, p \u3c 0.03) were exposed in group A than group B. Longer segments of ipsilateral superior cerebellar artery (SCA) were exposed in group A than group B (36.0 ± 4.91 mm vs 25.8 ± 3.55 mm, p \u3c 0.02), but there was less exposure of contralateral SCA (0.00 ± 0.00 mm vs 7.95 ± 3.33 mm, p \u3c 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference between groups with regard to the combined area of the exposed cerebral peduncles and pons (p = 0.75). Although exposure of the medulla was limited, group A had significantly greater exposure of the medulla than group B (p \u3c 0.01). Finally, group A had a smaller anterior angle of attack than group B (24.1° ± 5.62° vs 34.8° ± 7.51°, p \u3c 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to quantitatively identify the advantages and limitations of the CP and PTAP approaches from an anatomical perspective. Understanding these data will aid in designing maximally effective yet minimally invasive approaches to PCM

The Neuroanatomic Studies of Albert L. Rhoton Jr. in Historical Context: An Analysis of Origin, Evolution, and Application

The incorporation of perspective into art and science revolutionized the study of the brain. Beginning in about 1504, Leonardo da Vinci began to model the ventricles of the brain in three dimensions. A few years later, Andreus Vesalius illustrated radically novel brain dissections. Thomas Willis\u27 work, Cerebri Anatome (1664), illustrated by Christopher Wren, remarkably showed the brain undersurface. Later, in the early 1800s, Charles Bell\u27s accurate images of neural structures changed surgery. In the 1960s, Albert L. Rhoton Jr. (1932–2016) began to earn his place among the preeminent neuroanatomists by focusing his lens on microanatomy to harness a knowledge of microneurosurgery, master microneurologic anatomy, and use it to improve the care of his patients. Although his biography and works are well known, no analysis has been conducted to identify the progression, impact, and trends in the totality of his publications, and no study has assessed his work in a historical context compared with the contributions of other celebrated anatomists. We analyzed 414 of 508 works authored by Rhoton; these studies were analyzed according to subjects discussed, including anatomic region, surgical approaches, subjects covered, anatomic methods used, forms of multimedia, and subspecialty. Rhoton taught detailed neuroanatomy from a surgical perspective using meticulous techniques that evolved as the technical demands of neurosurgery advanced, inspiring students and contemporaries. His work aligns him with renowned figures in neuroanatomy, arguably establishing him historically as the most influential anatomist of the neurosurgical era

Nancy Davis Reagan, First Lady with a neurosurgical legacy

Various well-known people associated with the history of the presidency of the United States have experienced neurological disease or injury, especially trauma to the head or spine. Nancy Reagan, however, as the wife of President Ronald Reagan and First Lady, would leave a significant and lasting mark on the progress of neurosurgical science and education. Recognized for endeavors against drug abuse, Alzheimer\u27s disease, and polio, her interest in neurosurgical research is less well known. Nancy\u27s father Loyal Davis was a remarkable neurosurgeon and educator of extraordinary influence. When Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) founder John Green experienced complications after an illness, Davis served as BNI director during 1966-1967. After Davis\u27s death in 1982, Robert Spetzler, who had been a student of Davis at Northwestern University Medical School and was then BNI director, convinced Green, despite his misgivings, to support a neurosurgical laboratory recognizing Davis. In 1988, Nancy Reagan, then First Lady, dedicated the Loyal and Edith Davis Neurosurgical Research Laboratory. At the dedication, she remarked on her years growing up in the home of a pioneering neurosurgeon and remarked that my father believed deeply in the importance of research to develop new methods for treating patients. Green and Spetzler\u27s unified efforts honored the extraordinary career of Davis in a manner he would have appreciated, were supported by a First Lady with deep involvement in politics and philanthropy dedicated to promoting advances in medicine, and are part of neurosurgery\u27s unique heritage

A two-stage combined anterolateral and endoscopic endonasal approach to the petroclival region: an anatomical study and clinical application

OBJECT: The pretemporal transcavernous anterior petrosal (PTAP) approach and the combined petrosal (CP) approach have been used to resect petroclival meningiomas (PCMs). In this cadaveric anatomical study, a two-stage combined PTAP and endoscopic endonasal far medial (EEFM) approach (the PTAPE approach) was compared morphometrically to the CP approach. A case study provides a clinical example of using the PTAPE approach to treat a patient with a PCM. The key elements of the approach selection process are outlined. METHODS: Five cadaveric specimens underwent a CP approach and 5 underwent a PTAPE approach. The area of drilled clivus, length of multiple cranial nerves (CNs), and the area of brain stem exposure were measured, reported as means (standard deviations) by group, and compared. RESULTS: The total area of the clivus drilled in the PTAPE group (695.3 [121.7] mm) was greater than in the CP group (88.7 [17.06] mm, P \u3c 0.01). Longer segments of CN VI were exposed via the PTAPE than the CP approach (35.6 [9.07] vs. 16.3 [6.02] mm, P \u3c 0.01). CN XII (8.8 [1.06] mm) was exposed only in the PTAPE group. Above the pontomedullary sulcus, the total area of brain stem exposed was greater with the PTAPE than the CP approach (1003.4 [219.5] mm vs. 437.6 [83.7] mm, P \u3c 0.01). Similarly, the total exposure of the medulla was greater after the PTAPE than the CP exposure (240.2 [57.06] mm vs. 48.1 [19.9] mm, P \u3c 0.01). CONCLUSION: A combined open-endoscopic paradigm is proposed for managing large PCMs. This approach incorporates the EEFM approach to address the limitations of the PTAP and the CP approach in a systematic fashion. Understanding the anatomical findings of this study will aid in tailoring surgical approaches to patients with these complex lesions

Comparative Anatomical Assessment of Full vs Limited Transcavernous Exposure of the Carotid-Oculomotor Window

BACKGROUND: Although the full transcavernous approach affords extensive mobilization of the oculomotor nerve (OMN) for exposure of the basilar apex and interpeduncular cistern region, this time-consuming procedure requires substantial dural dissection along the anterior middle cranial fossa. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the extent to which limited middle fossa dural elevation affects the carotid-oculomotor window (C-OMW) surgical area during transcavernous exposure after OMN mobilization. METHODS: Four cadaveric specimens were dissected bilaterally to study the C-OMW area afforded by the transcavernous exposure. Each specimen underwent full and limited transcavernous exposure and anterior clinoidectomy (1 procedure per side; 8 procedures). Limited exposure was defined as a dural elevation confined to the cavernous sinus. Full exposure included dural elevation over the gasserian ganglion, extending to the middle meningeal artery and lateral middle cranial fossa. RESULTS: The C-OMW area achieved with the limited transcavernous exposure, compared with full transcavernous exposure, provided significantly less total area with OMN mobilization (22 ± 6 mm2 vs 52 ± 26 mm2, P = .03) and a smaller relative increase in area after OMN mobilization (11 ± 5 mm2 vs 36 ± 13 mm2, P = .03). The increase after OMN mobilization in the C-OMW area after OMN mobilization was 136% ± 119% with a limited exposure vs 334% ± 216% with a full exposure. CONCLUSION: In this anatomical study, the full transcavernous exposure significantly improved OMN mobilization and C-OMW area compared with a limited transcavernous exposure. If a transcavernous exposure is pursued, the difference in the carotid-oculomotor operative corridor area achieved with a limited vs full exposure should be considered