2 research outputs found

    Numerical study of the influence of the interaction distance, the polymeric strips pre-tensioning, and the soil–polymeric interaction on the performance of back-to-back reinforced soil walls

    Get PDF
    This study describes the results of a series of 2D finite element method (FEM) numerical models of 6 m high back-to-back reinforced soil walls using the geotechnical software PLAXIS. These structures are used to support embankments, especially for bridge abutment approaches. The quantitative influence of problem geometry, strip pre-tensioning, strip type, and surcharging on horizontal displacements, development of soil shear and plastic zones, lateral earth pressure, and reinforcement loads is presented. The numerical results demonstrate how this type of reinforced soil walls perform jointly at a certain distance of interaction between the two opposite walls. The walls of the two opposing sides clearly interact with each other when they are close enough and with an overlapping reinforcement layout. Pre-tensioning load can contribute to achieving vertical wall-facing alignment at the end of construction. Using perforated/holed strips, the tensile loads at the end of construction were reduced by about 30% due to the improved polymeric–soil interface strength and stiffness.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

    FE analysis of the effect of soil-reinforcement interaction and reinforcement pre-tensioning on the behaviour of back-to-back polymeric strip reinforced soil walls

    No full text
    This paper is focused on the performance of back-to-back reinforced soil walls using 2D numerical models developed using the geotechnical finite element method (FEM) code PLAXIS. These structures are used to support embankments for roads and railways, and for bridge abutment approaches. Two different polymeric strip reinforcement types with smooth and perforated sheathing are considered. The distance between the back of the reinforced soil zones for the two opposing walls was varied in the models, and analyses were carried out with and without reinforcement pre-tensioning during construction. The quantitative influence of problem geometry, strip type, surcharging and strip pre-tensioning on horizontal displacements, reinforcement loads and development of soil shear zones is presented. The numerical results demonstrate that a modest pre-tensioning load can assist to achieve vertical or near-vertical wall facing alignment at end of construction. Tensile loads in the reinforcement strips at end of construction were reduced by about 30% using the perforated strips due to the improved reinforcement-soil interface strength and stiffnessPostprint (published version
    corecore