Assessment of lateral costal artery with CT angiography: determination of prevalence and vessel length in the general population and its potential impact for coronary artery bypass grafting

Objectives Standard treatment for severe coronary artery disease (CAD) is coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). An underreported branch of the internal mammary artery, the lateral costal artery (LCA), can cause a steal phenomenon after CABG, resulting in angina. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and length of LCA based on CT angiography (CTA). Methods This retrospective study included adult patients undergoing a thoracic CTA between January 2016 and August 2018. Exclusion criteria were prior CABG, insufficient clinical information, or inadequate image quality. Two blinded, independent readers reviewed all studies for the prevalence of the LCA. Positive cases were reviewed by two readers (R1/R2) for side distribution and vessel length, measured in intercostal spaces (ICS). Study indication, aortic size, and coronary calcification were noted. Results LCA was present in up to 42/389 (11%) of studies (60.3 +/- 16.7 years, 30 males). The LCA was most commonly unilateral (n= 23, 55%). Median vessel length was 2 ICS (IQR 0; 3). Logistic regression was not significant in vessel distribution for sex (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.28-1.15;p= 0.11). Inter-observer agreement in detecting LCA was substantial (kappa 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.83) and excellent for side/length distribution (kappa 0.94, 95% CI 0.82-1.0; ICC 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.98). Conclusion The LCA is uncommon and most often unilateral and extends the third rib. Radiologists should be aware of this vessel and its potential role in angina after CABG, particularly when large

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance based diagnosis of left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy: impact of cine bSSFP strain analysis

Abstract Background Investigation of the myocardial strain characteristics of the left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) phenotype with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking. Methods CMR cine balanced steady-state free precession data sets of 59 retrospectively identified LVNC phenotype patients (40 years, IQR: 28–50 years; 51% male) and 36 healthy subjects (39 years, IQR: 30–47 years; 44% male) were evaluated for LV volumes, systolic function and mass. Hypertrabeculation in patients and healthy subjects was evaluated against established CMR diagnostic criteria. Global circumferential strain (GCS), global radial strain (GRS) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were evaluated with feature-tracking software. Subgroup analyses were performed in patients (n = 25) and healthy subjects (n = 34) with normal LV volumetrics, and with healthy subjects (n = 18) meeting at least one LVNC diagnostic criteria. Results All LVNC phenotype patients, as well as a significant proportion of healthy subjects, met morphology-based CMR diagnostic criteria: non-compacted (NC): compacted myocardial diameter ratio > 2.3 (100% vs. 19.4%), NC mass > 20% (100% vs. 44.4%) and > 25% (100% vs. 13.9%), and NC mass indexed to body surface area > 15 g/m2 (100% vs. 41.7%). LVNC phenotype patients demonstrated reduced GRS (26.4% vs. 37.1%; p < 0.001), GCS (− 16.5% vs. -20.5%; p < 0.001) and GLS (− 14.6% vs. -17.1%; p < 0.001) compared to healthy subjects, with statistically significant differences persisting on subgroup comparisons of LVNC phenotype patients with healthy subjects meeting diagnostic criteria. GCS also demonstrated independent and incremental diagnostic value beyond each of the morphology-based CMR diagnostic criteria. Conclusions LVNC phenotype patients demonstrate impaired strain by CMR feature tracking, also present on comparison of subjects with normal LV volumetrics meeting diagnostic criteria. The high proportion of healthy subjects meeting morphology-based CMR diagnostic criteria emphasizes the important potential complementary diagnostic value of strain in differentiating LVNC from physiologic hypertrabeculation

Diagnosis and Treatment of Endometriosis. Guideline of the DGGG, SGGG and OEGGG (S2k Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/045, August 2020)

Aims The aim of this official guideline published and coordinated by the German Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) in cooperation with the Austrian Society for Gynaecology and Obstetrics (OEGGG) and the Swiss Society for Gynaecology and Obstetrics (SGGG) was to provide consensusbased recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis based on an evaluation of the relevant literature. Methods This S2k guideline represents the structured consensus of a representative panel of experts with different professional backgrounds commissioned by the Guideline Committee of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG. Recommendations Recommendations on the epidemiology, aetiology, classification, symptomatology, diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis are given and special situations are discussed