Recommendations for the use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in percutaneous coronary interventions

Background To eliminate some of the potential late limitations of permanent metallic stents, the bioresorbable coronary stents or ‘bioresorbable vascular scaffolds’ (BVS) have been developed. Methods We reviewed all currently available clinical data on BVS implantation. Results Since the 2015 position statement on the appropriateness of BVS in percutaneous coronary interventions, several large randomised trials have been presented. These have demonstrated that achieving adequate 1 and 2 year outcomes with these first-generation BVS is not straightforward. These first adequately powered studies in non-complex lesions showed worse results if standard implan- tation techniques were used for these relatively thick scaffolds. Post-hoc analyses hypothesise that outcomes similar to current drug-eluting stents are still possible if aggressive lesion preparation, adequate sizing and high-pressure postdilatation are implemented rigorously. As long as this has not been confirmed in prospective studies the usage should be restricted to experienced centres with continuous outcome monitoring. For more complex lesions, results are even more disappointing and usage should be discouraged. When developed, newer generation scaffolds with thinner struts or faster resorption rates are expected to improve outcomes. In the meantime prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, beyond one year) is recommended in an individu-alised approach for patients treated with current generation BVS. Conclusion The new 2017 recommendations downgrade and limit the use of the current BVS to experienced centres within dedicated registries using the updated implantation protocol and advise the prolonged usage of DAPT. In line with these recommendations the manufacturer does not supply devices to the hospitals without such registries in place

Randomized trial of a GPIIb/IIIa platelet receptor blocker in refractory unstable angina

BACKGROUND: Patients with unstable angina despite intensive medical therapy, ie, refractory angina, are at high risk for developing thrombotic complications: myocardial infarction or coronary occlusion during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Chimeric 7E3 (c7E3) Fab is an antibody fragment that blocks the platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor and potently inhibits platelet aggregation. METHODS AND RESULTS: To evaluate whether potent platelet inhibition could reduce these complications, 60 patients with dynamic ST-T changes and recurrent pain despite intensive medical therapy were randomized to c7E3 Fab or placebo. After initial angiography had demonstrated a culprit lesion suitable for PTCA, placebo or c7E3 Fab was administered as 0.25 mg/kg bolus injection followed by 10 micrograms/min for 18 to 24 hours until 1 hour after completion of second angiography and PTCA. During study drug infusion, ischemia occurred in 9 c7E3 Fab and 16 placebo patients (P = .06). During hospital stay, 12 major events occurred in 7 placebo patients (23%), including 1 death, 4 infarcts, and 7 urgent interventions. In the c7E3 Fab group, only 1 event (an infarct) occurred (3%, P = .03). Angiography showed improved TIMI flow in 4 placebo and 6 c7E3 Fab patients and worsening of flow in 3 placebo patients but in none of the c7E3 Fab patients. Quantitative analysis showed significant improvement of the lesion in the patients treated with c7E3 Fab, which was not observed in the placebo group, although the difference between the two treatment groups was not significant. Measurement of platelet function and bleeding time demonstrated > 90% blockade of GPIIb/IIIa receptors, > 90% reduction of ex vivo platelet aggregation to ADP, and a significantly prolonged bleeding time during c7E3 Fab infusion, without excess bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Combined therapy with c7E3 Fab, heparin, and aspirin appears safe. These pilot study results support the concept that effective blockade of the platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptors can reduce myocardial infarction and facilitate PTCA in patients with refractory unstable angina

Mortality, reinfarction, left ventricular ejection fraction and costs following reperfusion therapies for acute myocardial infarction

The comparative efficacy of thrombolytic drugs and primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction have recently been studied, but long-term follow-up data have not yet been reported. We conducted a randomized trial involving 301 patients with acute myocardial infarction; 152 patients were randomized to primary angioplasty and 149 to intravenous streptokinase. Left ventricular function was assessed with a radionuclide technique both at hospital discharge and at the end of the follow-up period. Follow-up data were collected after a mean (+/-SD) of 31 +/- 9 months. Total medical costs were calculated. At the end of the follow-up period, 5% of the angioplasty patients had died from a cardiac cause compared to 11% of the patients randomized to intravenous streptokinase, P = 0.031. Cardiac death or a non-fatal reinfarction occurred in 7% of angioplasty patients compared to 28% of streptokinase patients, P < 0.001. There was a sustained benefit of angioplasty compared to streptokinase on left ventricular function. The total medical costs in the two groups were similar. Coronary anatomy (patency and single or multivessel disease), infarct location and previous myocardial infarction were important determinants of clinical outcome and costs. After 31 +/- 9 months of follow-up, primary angioplasty compared to intravenous streptokinase results in a lower rate of cardiac death and reinfarction, a better left ventricular ejection fraction, and no increase in total medical costs