Reply: Debating the Definition and Incidence of Isolated Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Cardiolog

Unipolar voltage mapping in right ventricular cardiomyopathy: pitfalls, solutions and advantages

Aims Endocardial unipolar and bipolar voltage mapping (UVM/BVM) of the right ventricle (RV) are used for transmural substrate delineation. However, far-field electrograms (EGMs) and EGM changes due to injury current may influence automatically generated UVM. Epicardial BVM is considered less accurate due to the impact of fat thickness (FT). Data on epicardial UVM are sparse. The aim of the study is two-fold: to assess the influence of the manually corrected window-of-interest on UVM and the potential role of epicardial UVM in RV cardiomyopathies.Methods and results Consecutive patients who underwent endo-epicardial RV mapping with computed-tomography (CT) integration were included. Mapping points were superimposed on short-axis CT slices and correlated with local FT. All points were manually re-analysed and the window-of-interest was adjusted to correct for false high unipolar voltage (UV). For opposite endo-epicardial point-pairs, endo-epicardial bipolar voltage (BV) and UV were correlated for different FT categories. A total of 3791 point-pairs of 33 patients were analysed. In 69% of endocardial points and 63% of epicardial points, the window-of-interest needed to be adjusted due to the inclusion of far-field EGMs, injury current components, or RV-pacing artifacts. The Pearson correlation between corrected endo-epicardial BV and UV was lower for point-pairs with greater FT; however, this correlation was much stronger and less influenced by fat for UV.Conclusion At the majority of mapping sites, the window-of-interest needs to be manually adjusted for correct UVM. Unadjusted UVM underestimates low UV regions. Unipolar voltage seems to be less influenced by epicardial fat, suggesting a promising role for UVM in epicardial substrate delineation.Cardiolog

The harm of delayed diagnosis of arrhythmogenic cardiac sarcoidosis: a case series

Aims Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a known cause of ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, an arrhythmogenic presentation may not prompt immediate comprehensive evaluation. We aimed to assess the diagnostic and disease course of patients with arrhythmogenic cardiac sarcoidosis (ACS).Methods and results From the Leiden VT-ablation-registry, consecutive patients with CS as underlying aetiology were retrospectively included. Data on clinical presentation, time-to-diagnosis, cardiac function, and clinical outcomes were collected. Patients were divided in early (<6 months from first cardiac presentation) and late diagnosis. After exclusion of patients with known causes of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), 15 (12%) out of 129 patients with idiopathic NICM were ultimately diagnosed with CS and included. Five patients were diagnosed early; all had early presentation with VTs. Ten patients had a late diagnosis with a median delay of 24 (IQR 15-44) months, despite presentation with VT (n=5) and atrioventricular block (n=4). In 6 of 10 patients, reason for suspicion of ACS was the electroanatomical scar pattern. In patients with early diagnosis, immunosuppressive therapy was immediately initiated with stable cardiac function during follow-up. Adversely, in 7 of 10 patients with late diagnosis, cardiac function deteriorated before diagnosis, and in only one cardiac function recovered with immunosuppressive therapy. Six (40%) patients died (five of six with late diagnosis).Conclusion Arrhythmogenic cardiac sarcoidosis is an important differential diagnosis in NICM patients referred for VT ablation. Importantly, the diagnosis is frequently delayed, which leads to a severe disease course, including irreversible cardiac dysfunction and death. Early recognition, which can be facilitated by electroanatomical mapping, is crucial.Pathogenesis and treatment of chronic pulmonary disease

Electroanatomical Voltage Mapping to Distinguish Right-Sided Cardiac Sarcoidosis From Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate the value of electroanatomical voltage mapping (EAVM) to distinguish cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) from arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) in patients with ventriculartachycardia from the right ventricle (RV).BACKGROUND CS can mimic ARVC. Because scar in ARVC is predominantly subepicardial, this study hypothesized that the relative sizes of endocardial low bipolar voltage (BV) to low unipolar voltage (UV) areas may distinguish CS from ARVC.METHODS Patients with CS affecting the RV (n = 14), patients with gene-positive ARVC (n = 13), and a reference group of patients without structural heart disease (n = 9) who underwent RV endocardial EAVM were included. RV regionspecific BV and UV cutoffs were derived from control subjects. In CS and ARVC, segmental involvement was determined and low-voltage areas were measured, using RESULTS In control subjects, BV and UV varied significantly among RV regions. The basal septum was involved in 71% of CS patients and in none of ARVC patients. Ratio5.5 discriminated CS from ARVC the best. An algorithm including Ratio5.5≥0.45 and basal septal involvement identified CS with 93% sensitivity and 85% specificity. This was validated in a separate population (CS [n = 6], ARVC [n = 10]) with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity.CONCLUSIONS EAVM provides detailed information about scar characteristics and scar distribution in the RV. An algorithm combining Ratio5.5 (area BV Cardiolog

Bortezomib maintenance after R-CHOP, cytarabine and autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with mantle cell lymphoma, results of a randomised phase II HOVON trial

Rituximab-containing induction followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard first-line treatment for young mantle cell lymphoma patients. However, most patients relapse after ASCT. We investigated in a randomised phase II study the outcome of a chemo-immuno regimen and ASCT with or without maintenance therapy with bortezomib. Induction consisted of three cycles R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone), two cycles high-dose cytarabine, BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) and ASCT. Patients responding were randomised between bortezomib maintenance (1·3 mg/m2 intravenously once every 2 weeks, for 2 years) and observation. Of 135 eligible patients, 115 (85%) proceeded to ASCT, 60 (44%) were randomised. With a median follow-up of 77·5 months for patients still alive, 5-year event-free survival (EFS) was 51% (95% CI 42–59%); 5-year overall survival (OS) was 73% (95% CI 65–80%). The median follow-up of randomised patients still alive was 71·5 months. Patients with bortezomib maintenance had a 5-year EFS of 63% (95% CI 44–78%) and 5-year OS of 90% (95% CI 72–97%). The patients randomised to observation had 5-year PFS of 60% (95% CI, 40–75%) and OS of 90% (95% CI 72–97%). In conclusion, in this phase II study we found no indication of a positive effect of bortezomib maintenance after ASCT

The precordial R ' wave: a novel discriminator between cardiac sarcoidosis and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy in patients presenting with ventricular tachycardia

BACKGROUND Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) with right ventricular (RV) involvement can mimic arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Histopathological differences may result in disease-specific RV activation patterns detectable on the 12-lead electrocardiogram. Dominant subepicardial scar in ARVC leads to delayed activation of areas with reduced voltages, translating into terminal activation delay and occasionally (epsilon) waves with a small amplitude. Conversely, patchy transmural RV scar in CS may lead to conduction block and therefore late activated areas with preserved voltages reflected as preserved R' waves.OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the distinct terminal activation patterns in precordial leads V-1 through V-3 as a discriminator between CS and ARVC.METHODS Thirteen patients with CS affecting the RV and 23 patients with gene-positive ARVC referred for ventricular tachycardia ablation were retrospectively included in a multicenter approach. A non-ventricular-paced 12-lead surface electrocardiogram was analyzed for the presence and the surface area of the R' wave (any positive deflection from baseline after an S wave) in leads V-1 through V-3.RESULTS An R' wave in leads V-1 through V-3 was present in all patients with CS compared to 11 (48%) patients with ARVC (P=.002). An algorithm including a PR interval of >= 220 ms, the presence of an R' wave, and the surface area of the maximum R' wave in leads V-1 through V-3 of similar to 1.65 mm(2) had 85% sensitivity and 96% specificity for diagnosing CS, validated in a second cohort (18 CS and 40 ARVC) with 83% sensitivity and 88% specificity.CONCLUSION An easily applicable algorithm including PR prolongation and the surface area of the maximum R' wave in leads V-1 through V-3 of similar to 1.65 mm(2) distinguishes CS from ARVC. This QRS terminal activation in precordial leads V-1 through V-3 may reflect disease-specific scar patterns.Cardiolog

Routine versus on demand removal of the syndesmotic screw; A protocol for an international randomised controlled trial (RODEO-trial)

Background: Syndesmotic injuries are common and their incidence is rising. In case of surgical fixation of the syndesmosis a metal syndesmotic screw is used most often. It is however unclear whether this screw needs to be removed routinely after the syndesmosis has healed. Traditionally the screw is removed after six to 12 weeks as it is thought to hamper ankle functional and to be a source of pain. Some studies however suggest this is only the case in a minority of patients. We therefore aim to investigate the effect of retaining the syndesmotic screw on functional outcome. Design: This is a pragmatic international multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with an acute syndesmotic injury for which a metallic syndesmotic screw was placed. Patients will be randomised to either routine removal of the syndesmotic screw or removal on demand. Primary outcome is functional recovery at 12 months measured with the Olerud-Molander Score. Secondary outcomes are quality of life, pain and costs. In total 194 patients will be needed to demonstrate non-inferiority between the two interventions at 80% power and a significance level of 0.025 including 15% loss to follow-up. Discussion: If removal on demand of the syndesmotic screw is non-inferior to routine removal in terms of functional outcome, this will offer a strong argument to adopt this as standard practice of care. This means that patients will not have to undergo a secondary procedure, leading to less complications and subsequent lower costs. Trial registration: This study was registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR5965), Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02896998) on July 15th 2016

Risk of adverse outcomes associated with cardiac sarcoidosis diagnostic schemes

BackgroundMultiple cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) diagnostic schemes have been published.ObjectivesThis study aims to evaluate the association of different CS diagnostic schemes with adverse outcomes. The diagnostic schemes evaluated were 1993, 2006, and 2017 Japanese criteria and the 2014 Heart Rhythm Society criteria.MethodsData were collected from the Cardiac Sarcoidosis Consortium, an international registry of CS patients. Outcome events were any of the following: all-cause mortality, left ventricular assist device placement, heart transplantation, and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Logistic regression analysis evaluated the association of outcomes with each CS diagnostic scheme.ResultsA total of 587 subjects met the following criteria: 1993 Japanese (n = 310, 52.8%), 2006 Japanese (n = 312, 53.2%), 2014 Heart Rhythm Society (n = 480, 81.8%), and 2017 Japanese (n = 112, 19.1%). Patients who met the 1993 criteria were more likely to experience an event than patients who did not (n = 109 of 310, 35.2% vs n = 59 of 277, 21.3%; OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.38-2.90; P P P = 0.18 or OR: 1.51; 95% CI: 0.97-2.33; P = 0.067, respectively).ConclusionsCS patients who met the 1993 and the 2006 criteria had higher odds of adverse clinical outcomes. Future research is needed to prospectively evaluate existing diagnostic schemes and develop new risk models for this complex disease.Cardiolog