7 research outputs found

    The impact of boredom on creativity in the classroom

    No full text
    How does engagement impact creativity in the classroom? In general, engagement with lessons is widely regarded as the goal of an educational set-up. Engagement is generally associated with positive emotions, which some work has suggested promotes creativity (e.g., de Rooij & Vromans, 2018). Thus, one might expect engagement to lead to greater creativity. Boredom, however, induced better performance in divergent-thinking tasks in adults (Mann & Caldman, 2013): adults who had been asked to copy numbers from a phone book came up with more creative uses for two plastic cups. Boredom puts learners in a state in which they require stimulation, and thus the deprivation triggers them to generate that needed stimulation through thought and imagination (e.g., Brisset & Snow, 1993; Hebb, 1996; Fisher, 1993; Kierkegaard, 1843). Despite the popularity of both notions, little work has sought to uncover a unified theory of how exactly engagement or the lack of it might work to contribute to creativity and imagination. Further, no work has examined how engagement in the classroom impacts creativity in school-aged children in the classroom. Could this boredom-induced boost to creativity observed in adults be strategically employed to induce heightened creativity in grade-schooled children? While it is possible, it remains untested. Bored adults expressed more divergent thinking, but we do not yet know if bored children would behave similarly. Adolescents emotional volatility is one factor that could change the outcome, for example. Though bored adults were creative, they also reliably associate boredom with a range of negative feelings, including stress, misery, frustration, and lethargy (Mann, 2006; Martin et al, 2006). These negative feelings have previously been associated with negative performance outcomes in adults, including poor work performance (Drory, 1982; Vodanovich, 2003) and absenteeism (Brisset & Snow, 1993). Further, arousal and emotional valence are known to interact in their impact on creativity in adults (Tidikis, Ash, & Collier, 2017). Since emotions are heightened throughout adolescents, the emotional experience of boredom may interact with the state itself in impacting changes in creativity. Boredom is a common experience throughout school. Its ubiquity makes it vital to understand in the interest of maximizing children's intellectual potential. We aim to conduct the first study of boredom on creativity in grade-school children. Previous studies of classroom disengagement have focused on harm to specific learning outcomes. Ours, by contrast, may show how disengagement could be leveraged towards a different end, in the interest of promoting innovation in the classroom. PI Celeste Kidd's group (UC Berkeley, www.kiddlab.com) has studied the cognitive mechanisms (including engagement) that govern learning throughout development, starting in infancy, using a combination of computational and behavioral methods. Co-PI Jennifer Symonds' group (University College Dublin) has previously studied the impact of boredom on children's learning, recently using a mundane English grammar exercise from the 1980's to induce boredom. Their combined skill set is ideal for this quantitative experimental proposal on creativity induction in the classroom. may be able to increase creative thinking. Any outcome, however, will be useful towards understanding how engagement impacts creativity

    Aging Fits the Disease Criteria of the International Classification of Diseases

    No full text
    corecore