735 research outputs found

    How Would States Be Affected By Health Reform?

    Get PDF
    Estimates for each state the number of uninsured who would become eligible for Medicaid under reform, those currently eligible who would enroll, those who would receive subsidies in insurance exchanges, and those who would be ineligible for assistance

    Massachusetts Health Reform: Solving the Long-Run Cost Problem

    Get PDF
    Outlines options for controlling the long-term costs of the state's universal health insurance, including managed competition, a new public insurance option, a semi-public agency to coordinate programs negotiating rates, and all-payer rate-setting

    Targeting Subsidies: Employers Versus Individuals

    Get PDF
    Provides an overview of the debate over whether subsidies to employers or to individuals would increase health coverage more efficiently. Argues for targeting low-income individuals but with reforms to limit financial exposure to a percentage of income

    Do Individual Mandates Matter?

    Get PDF
    Outlines the reasons why achieving universal health insurance coverage requires an individual mandate, and why individual mandate proposals must address the affordability of adequate coverage and develop fair and effective ways to enforce the mandate

    Changes in Insured Coverage and Access to Care for Middle-Class Americans, 1999-2002

    Get PDF
    This brief examines how insurance coverage and access to health care of middle class Americans changed between 1999 and 2002. We contrast the experience of the middle class with that of lower and higher income Americans over the period. These years were largely dominated by the downturn in the U.S. economy, although the first of the three years (1999) represented a continuation of the broad economic expansion of the 1990s

    How Would State-Based Individual Mandates Affect Health Insurance Coverage and Premium Costs?

    Get PDF
    Issue: The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 eliminated the financial penalty of the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate. States could reinstate a similar penalty to encourage health insurance enrollment, ensuring broad sharing of health care costs across healthy and sick populations to stabilize the marketplaces.Goal: To provide state-by-state estimates of the impact on insurance coverage, premiums, and mandate penalty revenues if the state were to adopt an individual mandate.Methods: Urban Institute's Health Insurance Policy Simulation Model (HIPSM) is used to estimate the coverage and cost impacts of state-specific individual mandates. We assume each state adopts an individual mandate similar to the ACA's.Findings and Conclusion: If all states implemented individual mandates, the number of uninsured would be lower by 3.9 million in 2019 and 7.5 million in 2022. On average, marketplace premiums would be 11.8 percent lower in 2019. State mandate penalty revenues would amount to 7.4billionanddemandforuncompensatedcarewouldbe7.4 billion and demand for uncompensated care would be 11.4 billion lower. The impact on coverage and on premiums varies in significant ways across states. For example, in 2019, the number of people uninsured would be 19 percent lower in Colorado and 10 percent lower in California if they implemented their own mandates. With mandates in place, average premiums would be 4 percent lower in Alaska and 15 percent lower in Washington

    How Auto-Enrollment Can Achieve Near-Universal Coverage: Policy and Implementation Issues

    Get PDF
    Issue: Automatic enrollment is receiving increased policy attention as a means of achieving universal coverage. Auto-enrollment also could have eliminated insurance gaps that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it could face resistance from some Americans who would newly be expected to pay premiums. The approach also raises difficult design and implementation issues.Goal: Explore how two auto-enrollment strategies, one affecting all legal residents and another affecting a narrower low-income population, might work.Methods: Based on lessons learned from the Affordable Care Act and understanding of subsidized insurance programs, we explore design and implementation issues, such as how to deem enrollment, how to collect premiums, and which exemptions to permit. We also use the Urban Institute's Health Insurance Policy Simulation Model (HIPSM) to estimate coverage and cost implications of each approach.Key Findings and Conclusions: Both the comprehensive and limited approach to auto-enrollment would require the development of new administrative systems and enhanced marketplace subsidies to improve coverage affordability. Each approach would operate more simply if accompanied by a public insurance option. We conclude that the administrative and financing challenges related to auto-enrollment can be addressed and that a balance between public costs and sufficient political support could be identified
    corecore