14 research outputs found

    Reducing the Weight of Spinal Pain in Children and Adolescents

    Get PDF
    Spinal pain in adults is a significant burden, from an individual and societal perspective. According to epidemiologic data, spinal pain is commonly found in children and adolescents, where evidence emerging over the past decade has demonstrated that spinal pain in adults can, in many cases, be traced back to childhood or adolescence. Nevertheless, very little focus has been on how to best manage spinal pain in younger age groups. The purpose of this article is to put the focus on spinal pain in children and adolescents and highlight how and where these problems emerge and how they are commonly dealt with. We will draw on findings from the relevant literature from adults to highlight potential common pathways that can be used in the management of spinal pain in children and adolescents. The overall focus is on how healthcare professionals can best support children and adolescents and their caregivers in making sense of spinal pain (when present) and support them in the self-management of the condition

    A microarray analysis of full depth knee cartilage of ovariectomized rats

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This short communication focuses the on articular cartilage and the subchondral bone, both of which play important roles in the development of osteoarthritis (OA). There are indications that estrogen-deficiency, as the post-menopausal state, accelerate the development of OA.</p> <p>Findings</p> <p>We investigated, which extracellular matrix (ECM) protein, proteases and different pro-inflammatory factors was up- or down-regulated in the knee joint tissue in response to estrogen-deficiency in rats induced by ovariectomy. These data support previous findings that several metalloproteinases (MMPs) and cysteine proteases are co-regulated with numerous collagens and proteoglycans that are important for cartilage integrity. Furthermore quite a few pro-inflammatory cytokines were regulated by estrogen deprivation.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We found multiple genes where regulated in the joint by estrogen-deficiency, many of which correspond well with our current knowledge of the pathogenesis of OA. It supports that estrogen-deficiency (e.g. OVX) may accelerate joint deterioration. However, there are also data that draw attention the need for better understanding of the synergy between proteases and tissue turnover.</p

    Paradoxical differences in pain ratings of the same stimulus intensity

    No full text
    Abstract Aims Stimulus intensity used for assessing temporal summation of pain (TSP) is commonly set at the participants’ pain tolerance. Yet pain ratings during TSP rarely reach that initial pain tolerance pain rating. This study aimed to explore the differences between baseline pain tolerance assessed by cuff algometry and subsequent pain ratings of the same stimulus intensity, and the reliability of these ratings over 2 sessions. Methods In two sessions, separated by one week, 24 healthy, pain-free males had their pressure pain detection (PDT) and tolerance threshold (PTT) recorded using a staircase inflation paradigm (5 kPa increments, 1sec-ON:4sec-OFF) with a cuff algometry system. The pain intensity was assessed during cuff stimulation using an electronic visual analogue scale (VAS, 0–10 cm). Three different inflation paradigms were then performed, using the PTT level as stimulation intensity, and a 1-s duration for each stimulus: PEAKS: 3 inflations at 0.17 Hz, SLOW: 10 inflations at 0.01 Hz, FAST: 10 inflations at 0.5 Hz). Approximately 5-min was kept between the staircase assessment and the first stimulation paradigm, and between each of the 3 inflation paradigms. The PTT and first inflation VAS rating from each paradigm was extracted. Results The VAS rating of PTT pressure was higher in the staircase (VAS: 8.5±2.1 cm) than the first PPT stimulus in any other paradigm (PEAKS: 5.4±2.0; SLOW: 4.6±2.1; FAST: 4.0±2.3, P &lt; 0.05). VAS ratings were also lower in each subsequent paradigm (i.e. PEAKS &gt; SLOW &gt; FAST, P &lt; 0.05). Intra-class coefficients demonstrated excellent reliability for each paradigm (all ICC &gt; 0.79) between sessions. Conclusions PTT, as assessed with the staircase inflation paradigm, was rated more painful during baseline assessment than when the identical stimulus profile (PPT intensity for 1-s) was applied afterwards and this finding is considered reliable. </jats:sec
    corecore