External muscle heating during warm-up does not provide added performance benefit above external heating in the recovery period alone

Having previously shown the use of passive external heating between warm-up completion and sprint cycling to have had a positive effect on muscle temperature (T m) and maximal sprint performance, we sought to determine whether adding passive heating during active warm up was of further benefit

Effect of combinations of passive and active warming on muscle temperature and sprint performance

Muscle temperature (Tm) has a significant effect on muscle function, force and power production [1], hence the adoption of warm up procedures before power based events. In the majority of sprint or power based events there are periods of maximal activity interspersed with periods of low or no activity, during which Tm may decline, adversely affecting subsequent performance. We have previously shown that Tm will decline during 30 minutes of inactivity following the completion of a warm up, and that the use of passive external heating between warm up completion and sprint cycling performance reduces Tm decline and improves peak power output [2]. The aim of the present study was to follow on from our first Tm study and determine whether, apart from using the electrical heating between warm up and event, there is an additional benefit of using the electrical heating during warm up completion on muscle temperature and subsequent measures of sprint cycling performance. The secondary goal was to look at the efficacy of a redesigned heating system covering a larger area of muscle than in [2]

Swine Influenza A Outbreak, Fort Dix, New Jersey, 1976

Published literature and events surrounding the outbreak are reviewed

Reducing muscle temperature drop post warm-up improves sprint cycling performance

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the effect of passive insulation versus external heating during recovery following a sprint specific warm up on thigh muscle temperature and subsequent maximal sprint performance. METHODS: On three separate occasions, 11 male cyclists (age 24.7 ± 4.2 years, height 1.82 ± 0.72m, body mass 77.9 ± 9.8 kg; mean ± S.D.) completed a standardized 15 min intermittent warm up on a cycle ergometer, followed by a 30 min passive recovery period before completing a 30 sec maximal sprint test. Muscle temperature was measured in the vastus lateralis at 1, 2 and 3 cm depth prior to and following the warm up and immediately before the sprint test. Absolute and relative peak power output was determined and blood lactate concentration was measured immediately post-exercise. During the recovery period participants wore a tracksuit top and either i) standard tracksuit pants (CONT); ii) insulated athletic pants (INS) or; iii) insulated athletic pants with integrated electric heating elements (HEAT). RESULTS: Warm up increased Tm by approximately 2.5°C at all depths, with no differences between conditions. During recovery, Tm remained elevated in HEAT compared to INS and CONT at all depths (p<0.001). Both peak and relative power output were elevated by 9.6% and 9.1% respectively in HEAT compared to CONT (both p<0.05). The increase in blood lactate concentration was greater (p<0.05) post sprint in HEAT (6.3 ± 1.8 mmol/L) but not INS (4.0 ± 1.8 mmol/L) vs. CONT (4.1 ± 1.9 mmol/L). CONCLUSION: Passive heating of the thighs between warm up completion and performance execution using pants incorporating electrically heated pads can attenuate the decline in Tm and improve sprint cycling performance