Correction of Static Posterior Shoulder Subluxation by Restoring Normal Scapular Anatomy Using Acromion and Glenoid Osteotomies: A Case Report

CASE A 40-year-old man presented with progressive shoulder pain, associated with static posterior subluxation and mild eccentric glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Compared with a mean statistical shape model of a normal shoulder, the patient's acromion was abnormally high and horizontal, and the glenoid abnormally inclined inferiorly and minimally retroverted. Restoration of normal scapular anatomy using 3-dimensional planned acromial and glenoid osteotomies led to recentering of the joint and full shoulder function up to 24 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION The correction of associated acromial and glenoid malformation can revert early static posterior subluxation of the shoulder. Whether successful recentering prevents progression of osteoarthritis remains to be established

Extension of the shoulder is essential for functional internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND Disabling loss of functional internal rotation (fIR) after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is frequent but not well understood. This study tested the hypothesis that limitation of fIR after RTSA is not primarily related to a deficit in internal rotation. METHODS Fifty patients (mean age at RTSA, 74 ± 11.7 years) who were consecutively seen at a yearly follow-up visit at 1-10 years (median, 4 years) after RTSA were prospectively examined with special attention to fIR. Patients with axillary nerve or deltoid dysfunction were excluded. Relative (age- and sex-adjusted) Constant-Murley scores (CSs) and Subjective Shoulder Values were assessed preoperatively and at final follow-up. In addition, active extension and 4 postoperative activities of daily living (ADLs) requiring fIR were tested at follow-up. Rotator cuff fatty infiltration and notching were evaluated radiographically. For analysis, patients were divided into a group with poor fIR (fIR-, n = 19), defined as ≤2 internal-rotation points in the CS, and a group with good fIR (fIR+, n = 31), defined as ≥4 internal-rotation points in the CS. RESULTS Active extension of the contralateral shoulders was comparable in the fIR- group (mean, 60.3° [standard deviation (SD), 11.2°]) and fIR+ group (66.1° [SD, 14.2°]). Postoperatively, a difference in active extension between the unaffected and operated sides was present in both groups and averaged 16° (55° [SD, 14.3°] in fIR+ group and 39.1° [SD, 10.8°] in fIR- group; P < .001). No patient in the fIR+ group had active extension < 40° (range, 40°-85°). Shoulders with extension ≥ 40° but unsatisfactory fIR had restricted passive internal rotation in extension. The ability to perform ADLs behind the back correlated better with shoulder extension than with so-called fIR measurements in the CS. CONCLUSION Functional internal rotation after RTSA requires at least 40° of shoulder extension. If fIR is unsatisfactory despite 40° of extension, passive restriction of internal rotation in full extension is the limiting factor. It is crucial to preserve or restore active shoulder extension to allow ADLs involving internal rotation

Computer-assisted analysis of functional internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: implications for component choice and orientation

PURPOSE Functional internal rotation (IR) is a combination of extension and IR. It is clinically often limited after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) either due to loss of extension or IR in extension. It was the purpose of this study to determine the ideal in-vitro combination of glenoid and humeral components to achieve impingement-free functional IR. METHODS RTSA components were virtually implanted into a normal scapula (previously established with a statistical shape model) and into a corresponding humerus using a computer planning program (CASPA). Baseline glenoid configuration consisted of a 28 mm baseplate placed flush with the posteroinferior glenoid rim, a baseplate inclination angle of 96° (relative to the supraspinatus fossa) and a 36 mm standard glenosphere. Baseline humeral configuration consisted of a 12 mm humeral stem, a metaphysis with a neck shaft angle (NSA) of 155° (+ 6 mm medial offset), anatomic torsion of -20° and a symmetric PE inlay (36mmx0mm). Additional configurations with different humeral torsion (-20°, + 10°), NSA (135°, 145°, 155°), baseplate position, diameter, lateralization and inclination were tested. Glenohumeral extension of 5, 10, 20, and 40° was performed first, followed by IR of 20, 40, and 60° with the arm in extension of 40°-the value previously identified as necessary for satisfactory clinical functional IR. The different component combinations were taken through simulated ROM and the impingement volume (mm$^{3}$) was recorded. Furthermore, the occurrence of impingement was read out in 5° motion increments. RESULTS In all cases where impingement occurred, it occurred between the PE inlay and the posterior glenoid rim. Only in 11 of 36 combinations full functional IR was possible without impingement. Anterosuperior baseplate positioning showed the highest impingement volume with every combination of NSA and torsion. A posteroinferiorly positioned 26 mm baseplate resulting in an additional 2 mm of inferior overhang as well as 6 mm baseplate lateralization offered the best impingement-free functional IR (5/6 combinations without impingement). Low impingement potential resulted from a combination of NSA 135° and + 10° torsion (4/6 combinations without impingement), followed by NSA 135° and -20° torsion (3/6 combinations without impingement) regardless of glenoid setup. CONCLUSION The largest impingement-free functional IRs resulted from combining a posteroinferior baseplate position, a greater inferior glenosphere overhang, 90° of baseplate inclination angle, 6 mm glenosphere lateralization with respect to baseline setup, a lower NSA and antetorsion of the humeral component. Surgeons can employ and combine these implant configurations to achieve and improve functional IR when planning and performing RTSA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Basic Science Study, Biomechanics

Posterior stability of the shoulder depends on acromial anatomy: a biomechanical study of 3D surface models

PURPOSE Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis is commonly associated with static posterior subluxation of the humeral head. Scapulae with static/dynamic posterior instability feature a superiorly and horizontally oriented acromion. We investigated whether the acromion acts as a restraint to posterior humeral translation. METHODS Five three-dimensional (3D) printed scapula models were biomechanically tested. A statistical shape mean model (SSMM) of the normal scapula of 40 asymptomatic shoulders was fabricated. Next, a SSMM of scapular anatomy associated with posterior subluxation was generated using data of 20 scapulae ("B1"). This model was then used to generate three models of surgical correction: glenoid version, acromial orientation, and acromial and glenoid orientation. With the joint axially loaded (100N) and the humerus stabilized, an anterior translation force was applied to the scapula in 35°, 60° and 75° of glenohumeral flexion. Translation (mm) was measured. RESULTS In the normal scapula, the humerus translates significantly less to contact with the acromion compared to all other configurations (p < .000 for all comparisons; i.e. 35°: "normal" 8,1 mm (± 0,0) versus "B1" 11,9 mm (± 0,0) versus "B1 Acromion Correction" 12,2 mm (± 0,2) versus "B1 Glenoid Correction" 13,3 mm (± 0,1)). Restoration of normal translation was only achieved with correction of glenoid and acromial anatomy (i.e. 75°: "normal" 11 mm (± 0,8) versus "B1 Acromion Correction" 17,5 mm (± 0,1) versus "B1 Glenoid Correction" 19,7 mm (± 1,3) versus "B1 Glenoid + Acromion Correction" 11,5 mm (± 1,1)). CONCLUSIONS Persistence or recurrence of static/dynamic posterior instability after correction of glenoid version alone may be related to incomplete restoration of the intrinsic stability that is conferred by a normal acromial anatomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V biomechanical study

Effect of Abduction Brace Wearing Compliance on the Results of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Background: The benefit of protective bracing after rotator cuff reconstruction has been debated for many years, although immobilization compliance has never been assessed objectively to date. In a previous study, compliance with the wearing of an abduction brace was measured for the first time with use of temperature-sensitive sensors. The purpose of the present follow-up study was to assess the effect of immobilization compliance on tendon-healing after rotator cuff repair. Methods: The clinical and radiographic outcomes for 46 consecutive patients with objectively assessed abduction brace wearing compliance after arthroscopic repair of a superior rotator cuff tear were prospectively analyzed. Rotator cuff integrity was examined with ultrasound. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the relative Constant-Murley score (RCS), the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and pain and patient satisfaction ratings. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the optimal cutoff value of abduction brace compliance for discriminating between shoulders that will and will not have a retear and the association of compliance with the failure of rotator cuff repair. Results: After a mean duration of follow-up of 20 ± 9 months, the odds ratio for having a rotator cuff repair failure was 13-fold higher for patients with a compliance rate of <60% (p = 0.037). The retear rate was 3% (1 of 35 patients) in the high-compliance cohort (≥60% compliance) and 27% (3 of 11) in the low-compliance cohort (<60% compliance) (p = 0.037). No differences in RCS, SSV, pain, or postoperative patient satisfaction were observed between patients with ≥60% compliance and those with <60% compliance. Conclusions: Patients with a compliance rate of <60% had a 13-fold increase in the risk of rotator cuff retear. The 2 patients with the lowest compliance rates (11% and 22%) both had retears. Due to the small sample size, no final conclusions can be drawn regarding the influence of immobilization compliance on tendon-healing after rotator cuff repair. These findings justify a prospective trial with a larger cohort to confirm or disprove the value of compliance with abduction bracing. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in wheelchair-dependent patients: a matched cohort study

Background Shoulder function in wheelchair-dependent patients is critical for preserving independence and quality of life due to lower extremity impairment. The purpose of this study was to report the revision rate, as well as clinical and radiological outcome in wheelchair-dependent patients treated with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and to compare them to an ambulating population. Methods Prospectively obtained data of 21 primary RTSAs in 17 wheelchair-dependent patients (5 male, 12 female) with a median age of 72.4 years (range: 49-80) and a minimum follow-up of 2 years were analyzed retrospectively. Revision rate, clinical (Subjective Shoulder Value = SSV, relative Constant-Murley Score = rCS, wheelchair user’s shoulder pain index = WUSPI) and radiological (glenoid loosening, scapular notching, glenoid inclination) outcome, as well as implant-related parameters (baseplate peg length, glenosphere size, bony augmentation), were compared with a 2:1 matching cohort of 42 ambulating patients (10 male, 32 female) with a median age of 72.5 years (range: 56-78). Results The revision rate was 9.5% in both cohorts. In the wheelchair cohort, two shoulders had to be revised due to a complete baseplate dislocation. In the matching cohort, four shoulders had to be revised due to one prosthetic dislocation, one traumatic and one atraumatic scapular spine fracture with glenoid baseplate dislocation, and one fracture of the greater tuberosity. Median preoperative SSV and rCS did not differ significantly between cohorts. Postoperative SSV was also comparable (wheelchair: median 70 (range: 10-99) vs. matching: median 70 (30-100), p = n.s.). Relative CS was significantly lower in the wheelchair cohort (65% vs. 81.4%, P = .004). Median postoperative WUSPI was 35 points (range: 13-40) for difficulty and 0 points for pain (range: 0-29). The highest difficulty and pain were found for ‘hygiene behind the back’ and ‘propulsion of wheelchair up a ramp or on uneven surface’. Glenoid loosening, scapular notching, and postoperative baseplate inclination did not differ significantly between cohorts. In the wheelchair cohort, glenoid autograft augmentation (38.1% vs. 7.1%, P = .002) and implantation of baseplates with longer pegs were performed more often (≥ 25mm: 38.1% vs. 7.1%, P = .004). Conclusion RTSA is a valuable therapeutic option for the treatment of advanced OA or irreparable rotator cuff tears in wheelchair-bound patients with high patient satisfaction. Postoperatively, poorer function and a higher rate of baseplate dislocations might be anticipated compared to ambulating patients

Restoration of the patient-specific anatomy of the distal fibula based on a novel three-dimensional contralateral registration method

PURPOSE: Posttraumatic fibular malunion alters ankle joint biomechanics and may lead to pain, stiffness, and premature osteoarthritis. The accurate restoration is key for success of reconstructive surgeries. The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy of a novel three-dimensional (3D) registration algorithm using different segments of the contralateral anatomy to restore the distal fibula. METHODS: Triangular 3D surface models were reconstructed from computed tomographic data of 96 paired lower legs. Four segments were defined: 25% tibia, 50% tibia, 75% fibula, and 75% fibula and tibia. A surface registration algorithm was used to superimpose the mirrored contralateral model on the original model. The accuracy of distal fibula restoration was measured. RESULTS: The median rotation error, 3D distance (Euclidean distance), and 3D angle (Euler's angle) using the distal 25% tibia segment for the registration were 0.8° (- 1.7-4.8), 2.1 mm (1.4-2.9), and 2.9° (1.9-5.4), respectively. The restoration showed the highest errors using the 75% fibula segment (rotation error 3.2° (0.1-8.3); Euclidean distance 4.2 mm (3.1-5.8); Euler's angle 5.8° (3.4-9.2)). The translation error did not differ significantly between segments. CONCLUSION: 3D registration of the contralateral tibia and fibula reliably approximated the premorbid anatomy of the distal fibula. Registration of the 25% distal tibia, including distinct anatomical landmarks of the fibular notch and malleolar colliculi, restored the anatomy with increasing accuracy, minimizing both rotational and translational errors. This new method of evaluating malreductions could reduce morbidity in patients with ankle fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV

Computer-assisted planning vs. conventional surgery for the correction of symptomatic mid-shaft clavicular nonunion and malunion

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of treatment of symptomatic mal- and/or nonunion of midshaft clavicle fractures using radiographically based free-hand open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or computer-assisted 3D-planned, personalized corrective osteotomies performed using patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and ORIF. The hypotheses were that (1) patients treated with computer-assisted planning and PSI would have a better clinical outcome, and (2) computer-assisted surgical planning would achieve a more accurate restoration of anatomy compared to the free-hand technique. METHODS Between 1998 and 2020, 13 patients underwent PSI, and 34 patients underwent free-hand ORIF and/or corrective osteotomy. After application of exclusion criteria, 12/13 and 11/34 patients were included in the study. The clinical examination included measurement of the active range of motion and assessment of the absolute and relative Constant-Murley Scores and the subjective shoulder value. Subjective satisfaction with the cosmetic result was assessed on a Likert scale from 0 to 100 (subjective aesthetic value). 11/13 and 6/11 patients underwent postoperative computed tomography evaluation of both clavicles. Computed tomography scans were segmented to generate 3D surface models. After projection onto the mirrored contralateral side, displacement analysis was performed. Finally, bony union was documented. The average follow-up time was 43 months in the PSI and 50 months in the free-hand cohort. RESULTS The clinical outcomes of both groups did not differ significantly. Median subjective shoulder value was 97.5% (70; 100) in the PSI group vs. 90% (0; 100) in the free-hand group; subjective aesthetic value was 86.4% (±10.7) vs. 75% (±18.7); aCS was 82.3 (±10.3) points vs. 74.9 (±26) points; and rCS was 86.7 (±11.3) points vs. 81.9 (±28.1) points. In the free-hand group, 2/11 patients had a postoperative neurological complication. In the PSI cohort, the 3D angle deviation was significantly smaller (PSI/planned vs. free-hand/contralateral: 10.8° (3.1; 23.8) vs. 17.4° (11.6; 42.4); P = .020)). There was also a trend toward a smaller 3D shift, which was not statistically significant (PSI/planned vs. free-hand/contralateral: 6 mm (3.4; 18.3) vs. 9.3 mm (5.1; 18.1); P = .342). There were no other significant differences. A bony union was achieved in all cases. CONCLUSION Surgical treatment of nonunion and malunions of the clavicle was associated with very good clinical results and a 100% union rate. This study, albeit in a relatively small cohort with a follow-up of 4 years, could not document any clinically relevant advantage of 3D planning and personalized operative templating over conventional radiographic planning and free-hand surgical fixation performed by experienced surgeons

Why is female gender associated with poorer clinical outcome after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of gender-specific research after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). While previous studies have documented worse outcome in women - a more thorough understanding of why outcome may differ is needed. We therefore asked: (1) Are there gender-specific differences in pre- and postoperative clinical scores, complications, surgery-related parameters and demographics? (2) Is female gender an independent risk factor for poorer clinical outcome after RTSA? (3) If so, why is female gender associated with poorer outcome after RTSA? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2005 and 2019, 987 primary RTSAs were performed in our institution. After exclusion criteria were applied, data of 422 female and 271 male patients were analyzed. Clinical outcome (absolute/relative Constant Score (a/rCS) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV)), complications (intra- and/or postoperative fracture, loosening), surgery-related parameters (indication, implant related characteristics) and demographics (age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and number of previous surgeries) were evaluated. Pre- and postoperative radiographs were analyzed (Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA), Deltoid-Tuberosity Index (DTI), Reverse Shoulder Angle (RSA), Lateralization (LSA) and Distalization Shoulder Angle (DSA)). RESULTS: Preoperative clinical scores (aCS, rCS, SSV and pain level) as well as postoperative clinical outcome (aCS, rCS) were significantly worse in women. However, the improvement between pre- and postoperative outcome was significantly higher in female patients for rCS (p=0.037), internal rotation (p<0.001) and regarding pain (p<0.001). Female patients had a significantly higher number of intraoperative as well as postoperative fractures (24.9% vs. 11.4%, p<0.001). The proportion of female patients with a DTI<1.4 was significantly higher than in males (p=0.01). Female gender was an independent negative predictor for postoperative rCS (p=0.047, Coefficient -0.084) and pain (p=0.017, Coefficient -0.574). In addition to female sex per se being a predictive factor of worse outcome, females were significantly more likely to meet two of the three most significant predictive factors: (1) significantly worse preoperative clinical scores and (2) higher rate of intra- and/or postoperative fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Female sex is a very weak, but isolated, negative predictive factor that negatively affects objective clinical outcome (rCS) after RTSA. However, differences did not reach the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and it is not a predictor for subjective outcome (SSV). The main reason for worse outcome in female patients seems to be a combination of higher preoperative disability and higher incidence of fractures. To improve the outcome of women, all measures that contribute to the reduction of perioperative fracture risk should be utilized

Unacceptable failure of osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid

PURPOSE Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) represents a challenging problem in young, physically active patients. It was the purpose of this investigation to evaluate the results of a pilot study involving glenoid resurfacing with a glenoid allograft combined with a hemiarthroplasty on the humeral side. METHODS Between April 2011 to November 2013, 5 patients (3 men, 2 women, mean age 46.4, range 35-57) with advanced OA of the glenohumeral joint, were treated with a humeral head replacement combined with replacement of the glenoid surface with an osteochondral, glenoid allograft. RESULTS Overall, clinically, there was one excellent, one satisfactory and three poor results. Mean preoperative subjective shoulder value (SSV) was 34% (range: 20-50%) and preoperative relative Constant-Murley-Score (CSr) was 43 points (range: 29-64 points). Three patients with poor results had to be revised within the first three years. Their mean pre-revision SSV and CSr were 38% (range: 15-80%) and 36 points (range: 7-59 points) respectively. One patient was revised 9 years after the primary procedure with advanced glenoid erosion and pain and one patient has an ongoing satisfactory outcome without revision. Their SSVs were 60% and 83%, their CSr were 65 points and 91 points, 9 and 10 years after the primary procedure, respectively. Mean follow-up was 7 years (2-10 years) and mean time to revision was 4 years (range: 1-9 years). CONCLUSION The in-vivo pilot study of a previously established in-vitro technique of osteochondral glenoid allograft combined with humeral HA led to three early failures and only one really satisfactory clinical outcome which, however, was associated with advanced glenoid erosion. Osteochondral allograft glenoid resurfacing was associated with an unacceptable early failure rate and no results superior to those widely documented for HA or TSA, so that the procedure has been abandoned. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, Case Series, Treatment Study