Inflammatory breast cancer-comparing the effectivity of preoperative docetaxel-epirubicine protocol to conventional antracycline-containing chemotherapy to achieve clinical benefit and complete pathological response

Our retrospective analysis compared the effectiveness of conventional antracycline-containing protocols (A+) and docetaxel/epirubicine (TE) as primary systemic chemotherapies (PSCT) for inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). Seventy IBC patients received either A + (n = 48) or TE (n = 22) as PSCT. The objective clinical response and clinical benefit rate of treated patients were 54.3% (A+: 54,2% vs. TE: 54,5%; p = 0,28) and 92.8% (A+: 91,7% vs. TE: 95,5%; p = 0,57), respectively. The clinical complete response rate (cCR) was 23.2% (A+: 27,1% vs. TE:4,5%; chi (2) = 4,79; p = 0,03) with 7.14% (A+: 10,4% vs. TE:0%; chi (2) = 2,47; p = 0,12) of pathological complete responses (pCR). The median progression free (PFS)/local progression free (LPFS)/overall survival (OS) was 2.0/5.4/4.0 years, respectively. Patients achieving cCR had a tendency for better survival parameters than patients with less than cCR. Response rates or survival data were not statistically different in the two chemotherapy (CT) treatment groups. The survival was not influenced by the number of CT cycles in either protocols. In this set of patients, the clinical efficacy of the two alternative primary systemic chemotherapies (A + and TE) is equivalent in the treatment of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), despite of the significant difference in favour of A + noticed in CRs. Six cycles of CT could be enough for patients achieving CR, however sequential pre- and/or postoperative CT with non cross-resistant drugs should be considered for non-responders

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans multidiszciplináris kezelésével szerzett hosszú távú eredmények 26 betegnél = Long-term experiences with multidisciplinary therapy of twenty-six patients with dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and review of the literature

A dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans alacsony vagy közepes malignitású, ritka, rosszindulatú daganat. A tumort a lassú, de agresszív lokális növekedés, az alacsony áttétképzési és a magas helyi kiújulási arány jellemzi. Az elsődleges kezelés a radikális sebészi eltávolítás hagyományos kimetszéssel vagy Mohs-féle sebészi technikával. Pozitív sebészi szél, recidív tumor esetén radio-, kemoterápia, illetve újabban imatinib mesylat alkalmazható. Célkitűzés: A szerzők 26, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans miatt onkológiai centrumban multidiszciplinárisan kezelt beteg hosszú távú klinikopatológiai utánkövetését végezték. Módszer és eredmények: A betegek átlagéletkora 44,7 év volt. Az utánkövetés átlagideje 60,57 hónap volt. Tizenöt betegnél (57,7%) sikerült R0 eltávolítást végezni, míg 11 betegnél (42,3%) csak R1 reszekciót. Az R0 reszekciók eléréséhez átlagosan 1,87 kimetszésre volt szükség. Adjuváns kezelésként a primer tumor eltávolítását követően 6 beteg (23%) részesült radioterápiában és 2 (7,6%) beteg kemoterápiában. Tizenhat betegnél nem észleltünk kiújulást. Tíz betegnél (38,4%) alakult ki recidíva, amely miatt további kezeléseket folytattunk. Egy beteg távoli áttétek miatt elhunyt. Statisztikai módszerekkel vizsgáltuk az irodalomban prognosztikai faktornak számító 50 év feletti életkor és a sebészi radikalitás hatását a helyi kiújulásra. Következtetések: A dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans multidiszciplináris kezeléssel eredményesen kezelhető daganat. Pontosabb következtetések levonásához nagyobb esetszám és multicentrikus randomizált vizsgálatok szükségesek. | Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans is a low or moderate grade malignant, uncommon soft tissue tumor. The tumor is characterized by slow, but locally aggressive growth, low metastatic potential and high recurrence rate. Initial treatment is the radical surgical excision, using traditional wide excision or Mohs surgery. In case of positive surgical margin or local recurrence, radio-chemotherapy and recently imatinib mesylate is used as adjuvant therapy. Aims: Twenty-six patients treated multidisciplinary for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans were followed up. Methods and Results: Mean age of the patients was 44.7 years; mean follow-up time was 60.57 months. In fifteen cases (57.7%) R0 resection was performed, while eleven patients (42,3%) received only R1 resection. An average of 1.87 resections was necessary in order to achieve R0 resection. Six patients (23%) received adjuvant radiotherapy and two patients (7.6%) adjuvant chemotherapy following the removal of the primary tumor. Sixteen patients had no local recurrence. Ongoing treatments were needed in the case of ten patients (38.4%) who developed local recurrence. One patient has deceased due to distant metastases. Using statistical methods we examined the effects indicated as prognostic factors in the literature on local recurrence, precisely, the effect of age above 50 years and surgical radicalism. Conclusions: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans can be successfully treated with multidisciplinary therapy. A larger number of cases and randomized multicenter investigations are needed in order to reach more accurate conclusion

Common NOD2/CARD15 variants are not associated with susceptibility or the clinicopathologic characteristics of sporadic colorectal cancer in Hungarian patients

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological observations suggest that cancer arises from chronically inflamed tissues. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a typical example as patients with longstanding IBD are at an increased risk for developing colorectal cancer (CRC) and mutations of the NOD2/CARD15 gene increase the risk for Crohn's disease (CD). Recently, NOD2/CARD15 has been associated with a risk for CRC in some studies, which stemmed from ethnically diverse populations. Our aim was to identify common NOD2/CARD15 mutations in Hungarian patients with sporadic CRC. METHODS: A total of 194 sporadic CRC patients (m/f: 108/86, age at diagnosis of CRC: 63.2 ± 9.1 years old) and 200 healthy subjects were included. DNA was screened for SNP8, SNP12 and SNP13 NOD2/CARD15 mutations by denaturing-HPLC and confirmed by direct sequencing. RESULTS: NOD2/CARD15 mutations were found in 28 patients (14.4%) and in 23 controls (11.5%, p = NS). Allele frequencies for SNP8/R702W (1.8% vs. 1.5%) SNP12/G908R (1.8% vs. 1.8%) and SNP13/3020insC (3.6% vs. 2.5%) were also not statistically different between patients and controls. The clinicopathologic characteristics of CRC patients with or without NOD2/CARD15 mutations were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that common NOD2/CARD15 mutations alone do not contribute to CRC risk in the Hungarian population

Effects of the lactase 13910 C/T and calcium-sensor receptor A986S G/T gene polymorphisms on the incidence and recurrence of colorectal cancer in Hungarian population

Background: Epidemiological studies suggested the chemopreventive role of higher calcium intake in colorectal carcinogenesis. We examined genetic polymorphisms that might influence calcium metabolism: lactase (LCT) gene 13910 C/T polymorphism causing lactose intolerance and calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) gene A986S polymorphism as a responsible factor for the altered cellular calcium sensation. Methods: 538 Hungarian subjects were studied: 278 patients with colorectal cancer and 260 healthy controls. Median follow-up was 17 months. After genotyping, the relationship between LCT 13910 C/T and CaSR A986S polymorphisms as well as tumor incidence/progression was investigated. Results: in patient with colorectal cancer, a significantly higher LCT CC frequency was associated with increased distant disease recurrence (OR = 4.04; 95% CI = 1.71-9.58; p = 0.006). The disease free survival calculated from distant recurrence was reduced for those with LCT CC genotype (log rank test p = 0.008). In case of CaSR A986S polymorphism, the homozygous SS genotype was more frequent in patients than in controls (OR = 4.01; 95% CI = 1.33-12.07; p = 0.014). The number of LCT C and CaSR S risk alleles were correlated with tumor incidence (p = 0.035). The CCSS genotype combination was found only in patients with CRC (p = 0.033). Conclusion: LCT 13910 C/T and CaSR A986S polymorphisms may have an impact on the progression and/or incidence of CRC

SHMT1 1420 and MTHFR 677 variants are associated with rectal but not colon cancer

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Association between rectal or colon cancer risk and serine hydroxymethyltransferase 1 (<it>SHMT1</it>) C1420T or methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (<it>MTHFR</it>) C677T polymorphisms was assessed. The serum total homocysteine (HCY), marker of folate metabolism was also investigated.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The <it>SHMT1 </it>and <it>MTHFR </it>genotypes were determined by real-time PCR and PCR-RFLP, respectively in 476 patients with rectal, 479 patients with colon cancer and in 461 and 478, respective controls matched for age and sex. Homocysteine levels were determined by HPLC kit. The association between polymorphisms and cancer risk was evaluated by logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex and body mass index. The population stratification bias was also estimated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There was no association of genotypes or diplotypes with colon cancer. The rectal cancer risk was significantly lower for <it>SHMT1 </it>TT (OR = 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.89) and higher for <it>MTHFR </it>CT genotypes (OR = 1.4, 95%CI 1.06-1.84). A gene-dosage effect was observed for <it>SHMT1 </it>with progressively decreasing risk with increasing number of T allele (p = 0.014). The stratified analysis according to age and sex revealed that the association is mainly present in the younger (< 60 years) or male subgroup. As expected from genotype analysis, the <it>SHMT1 </it>T allele/<it>MTHFR </it>CC diplotype was associated with reduced rectal cancer risk (OR 0.56, 95%CI 0.42-0.77 vs all other diplotypes together). The above results are unlikely to suffer from population stratification bias. In controls HCY was influenced by <it>SHMT1 </it>polymorphism, while in patients it was affected only by Dukes' stage. In patients with Dukes' stage C or D HCY can be considered as a tumor marker only in case of <it>SHMT1 </it>1420CC genotypes.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>A protective effect of <it>SHMT1 </it>1420T allele or <it>SHMT1 </it>1420 T allele/<it>MTHFR </it>677 CC diplotype against rectal but not colon cancer risk was demonstrated. The presence of <it>SHMT1 </it>1420 T allele significantly increases the HCY levels in controls but not in patients. Homocysteine could be considered as a tumor marker in <it>SHMT1 </it>1420 wild-type (CC) CRC patients in Dukes' stage C and D. Further studies need to clarify why <it>SHMT1 </it>and <it>MTHFR </it>polymorphisms are associated only with rectal and not colon cancer risk.</p

Goserelin for Ovarian Protection During Breast-Cancer Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Premature ovarian failure is a devastating long-term toxic effect of chemotherapy for premenopausal women. The survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in young women with operable hormone receptor–negative breast cancer is well known, but concern over becoming infertile may influence the choice of treatment for many women. A number of trials have investigated the combined use of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and adjuvant chemotherapy in an attempt to protect ovarian function in premenopausal women. Results of such studies were mixed, and there were few data on pregnancy outcomes. The aim of this randomized trial was to determine whether administration of the GnRH agonist goserelin with chemotherapy would reduce the rate of ovarian failure after adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment of hormone-receptor–negative early-stage breast cancer. A total of 257 premenopausal women with operable hormone receptor–negative breast cancer were randomized to receive standard chemotherapy with goserelin (goserelin group) or standard chemotherapy without goserelin (chemotherapy-alone group). The rate of ovarian failure at 2 years was the primary study end point. Ovarian failure was defined as the absence of menses for the preceding 6 months and follicle-stimulating hormone levels in the postmenopausal range at 2 years. Conditional logistic regression was used to compare rates. Secondary end points evaluated included pregnancy outcomes and disease-free and overall survival. Of the 257 patients, 218 were eligible and could be evaluated: 113 in the chemotherapy-alone group and 105 in the goserelin group. Complete primary end-point data were available for 135 of the 218 patients who could be evaluated. Among these, the ovarian failure rate was 8% in the goserelin group and 22% in the chemotherapy-alone group; the odds ratio was 0.30, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.09 to 0.97; 2-sided P = 0.04. To determine the effect of the missing primary end-point data on the main study findings, sensitivity analyses were performed. The results of these analyses showed that the missing data had no significant effect on the association between treatment and stratification variables (age and planned chemotherapy regimen). Among the 218 patients who could be evaluated, more women became pregnant in the goserelin group than in the chemotherapy-alone group (21% vs 11%, P = 0.03). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that more women in the goserelin group had improved disease-free survival (P = 0.04) and overall survival (P = 0.05). Consistent with the findings of previous randomized trials, these data suggest that administration of a GnRH agonist with chemotherapy protects ovarian function, reducing the risk of early menopause and improving prospects for fertility. Although missing primary-end-point data weaken interpretation of the findings, there is no evidence that the missing data influenced the relative comparison between randomized groups