Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring for the Detection of Nerve Root Injury during Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

Study Design Retrospective study. Purpose We aimed to determine the utility of transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring for the detection of intraoperative nerve root injury. Overview of Literature Intraoperative neuromonitoring is important for the prediction of neurological injuries or postoperative paralysis. Nerve root injury can develop as a complication of adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Methods We analyzed 295 patients who underwent ASD surgery using multi-channel TcMEP monitoring between 2010 and 2016 (58 men, 237 women; median age, 68 years; follow-up period ≥1 year). We defined the alarm point as a TcMEP amplitude 17.5° in PT (odds ratio, 17.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.994–153.560; p =0.010) was independently associated with intraoperative nerve root injury. Conclusions Multi-channel TcMEP monitoring may be useful for detecting nerve root injuries. A change in PT of >17.5° may be a significant risk factor for neurological events related to intraoperative nerve root injury

Minimum Clinically Important Differences in Oswestry Disability Index Domains and Their Impact on Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

Study Design Retrospective study. Purpose To calculate the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for total and individual domains of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and assess score distribution and changes over time in surgically treated adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. Overview of Literature Despite the common use of ODI for assessing ASD, there are no robust studies defining MCID values for this index. Methods This study included 240 consecutive ASD patients with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. We calculated MCID values for total and individual ODI domains using all or part of the Scoliosis Research Society-22R questionnaire as anchors. Using current MCID values, we measured the acquisition rates in patients who acquired MCID at follow-up in both total and individual ODI domains. Differences in pathology, age, and locations of the upper and lower instrumented vertebrae were analyzed. Results MCID of the total ODI score was 11%, with an area under the curve of 0.737. Each domain ranged from 0 to 2, with 1 being the most common value. In the pain and standing domains, >60% of the patients acquired MCID, although acquisition rates of the personal care, lifting, sleep, and sexual activity domains were relatively low (20%–35%). Patients with MCID had more radiographic improvement in lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, and T1 pelvic angle than those without MCID (p<0.05). Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe MCID of ODI (11%) after ASD surgery. In the pain and standing domains, most patients acquired MCID although the rates of acquisition of MCID in the personal care, lifting, sleep, and sexual activity domains were low. Spine surgeons should counsel their patients regarding the benefits and setbacks of ASD surgery

Epidemic Preventive Management during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Is a Risk Factor for Delirium after Spinal Cord Injury Surgery

Introduction: Epidemic preventive management during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may have negatively impacted perioperative outcomes in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). However, little is known about the relationship between epidemic preventive management and delirium after traumatic SCI. Here, we clarified the predictors of delirium after SCI surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 231 patients (mean age, 66 years) who underwent SCI surgery between 2017 and 2021. Patients were categorized into the delirium and non-delirium groups. Preoperative characteristics and laboratory data related to the occurrence of delirium were assessed. During the study period, we continued early surgical intervention. However, early rehabilitation intervention was not performed in the hospital rehabilitation room from May 2020 due to epidemic preventive management, which involved performing rehabilitation on the bed for 8 days postoperatively. Results: Postoperatively, 33 (14.3%) patients experienced delirium. Univariate analysis showed that age (p<0.01), presence of a psychiatric disorder (p<0.05), dementia (p<0.05), serum albumin (p<0.05) and hemoglobin (p<0.01) levels, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification score (p<0.05), and treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic (p<0.01) differed significantly in the delirium and non-delirium groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that an age 73 years (odds ratio [OR], 15.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.54-54.80; p<0.01), treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic (OR, 3.85; 95% CI, 1.61-9.22; p<0.01), and psychiatric disorder (OR, 29.38; 95% CI, 5.63-153.43; p<0.01) were associated with delirium. Conclusions: Our comprehensive preventive management during the COVID-19 pandemic was identified as one of the risk factors for delirium after SCI surgery. Patients with preventive management should be cautioned regarding the risk of delirium