Surgical Therapy for a Solitary Form of Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma: A Long-Term Survival Case

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a rare neoplasm of vascular origin. The clinical presentation of HEHE is variable, and the therapeutic criteria are still unclear since its natural history is unpredictable. A 53-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital because she had a 2.5-cm diameter nodule in the segment V of the liver. She had undergone segmental hepatectomy for solitary HEHE in segment VII 10 years before. There had been no recurrence for the 10 years after the first operation. The tumor was diagnosed as a new lesion of HEHE by percutaneous needle liver biopsy, and thereafter repeated hepatectomy was performed. HEHE seems to be resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Either surgical resection or orthotopic liver transplantation is generally recommended as a curative treatment for this disease. However, HEHE tends to be detected in multiple lesions, and localized disease is rare. Therefore, the chance of resection is very low. Some reports do not recommend local resection because of early aggressive tumor spread even after curative resection. We herein demonstrate a rare case of HEHE in a patient who underwent repeated hepatectomy for a solitary lesion and who survived for 17 years. It is concluded that surgical resection is one of the most effective treatments for a solitary form of HEHE

The lectin‐like domain of thrombomodulin is a drug candidate for both prophylaxis and treatment of liver ischemia and reperfusion injury in mice

Ischemia and reperfusion injury (IRI) can occur in any tissue or organ. With respect to liver transplantation, the liver grafts from donors by definition experience transient ischemia and subsequent blood reflow. IRI is a problem not only in organ transplantation but also in cases of thrombosis or circulatory disorders such as mesenteric ischemia, myocardial, or cerebral infarction. We have reported that recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rTM), which is currently used in Japan to treat disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), has a protective effect and suppresses liver IRI in mice. However, rTM may not be fully safe to use in humans because of its inherent anticoagulant activity. In the present study, we used a mouse liver IRI model to explore the possibility that the isolated lectin-like domain of rTM (rTMD1), which has no anticoagulant activity, could be effective as a therapeutic modality for IRI. Our results indicated that rTMD1 could suppress ischemia and reperfusion-induced liver damage in a dose-dependent manner without concern of associated hemorrhage. Surprisingly, rTMD1 suppressed the liver damage even after IR insult had occurred. Taken together, we conclude that rTMD1 may be a candidate drug for prevention of and therapy for human liver IRI without the possible risk of hemorrhage

Conversion to complete resection with mFOLFOX6 with bevacizumab or cetuximab based on K‐RAS status for unresectable colorectal liver metastasis (BECK study): Long‐term results of survival

[Background/Purpose]To investigate the long‐term outcome and entire treatment course of patients with technically unresectable CRLM who underwent conversion hepatectomy and to examine factors associated with conversion to hepatectomy. [Methods]Recurrence and survival data with long‐term follow‐up were analyzed in the cohort of a multi‐institutional phase II trial for technically unresectable colorectal liver metastases (the BECK study). [Results]A total of 22/12 patients with K‐RAS wild‐type/mutant tumors were treated with mFOLFOX6 + cetuximab/bevacizumab. The conversion R0/1 hepatectomy rate was significantly higher in left‐sided primary tumors than in right‐sided tumors (75.0% vs 30.0%, P = .022). The median follow‐up was 72.6 months. The 5‐year overall survival (OS) rate in the entire cohort was 48.1%. In patients who underwent R0/1 hepatectomy (n = 21), the 5‐year RFS rate and OS rate were 19.1% and 66.3%, respectively. At the final follow‐up, seven patients had no evidence of disease, five were alive with disease, and 20 had died from their original cancer. All 16 patients who achieved 5‐year survival underwent conversion hepatectomy, and 11 of them underwent further resection for other recurrences (median: 2, range: 1‐4). [Conclusions]Conversion hepatectomy achieved a similar long‐term survival to the results of previous studies in initially resectable patients, although many of them experienced several post‐hepatectomy recurrences. Left‐sided primary was found to be the predictor for conversion hepatectomy

Ability of minimally invasive surgery to decrease incisional surgical site infection occurrence in patients with colorectal cancer and other gastroenterological malignancies

BackgroundSurgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most important complications of surgery for gastroenterological malignancies because it leads to a prolonged postoperative hospital stay and increased inpatient costs. Furthermore, SSI can delay the initiation of postoperative treatments, including adjuvant chemotherapy, negatively affecting patient prognosis. Identifying the risk factors for SSI is important to improving intra- and postoperative wound management for at-risk patients.MethodsPatients with gastroenterological malignancies who underwent surgery at our institution were retrospectively reviewed and categorized according to the presence or absence of incisional SSI. Clinicopathological characteristics such as age, sex, body mass index, malignancy location, postoperative blood examination results, operation time, and blood loss volume were compared between groups. The same analysis was repeated of only patients with colorectal malignancies.ResultsA total of 528 patients (330 men, 198 women; mean age, 68 ± 11 years at surgery) were enrolled. The number of patients with diseases of the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon and rectum, liver, gallbladder, and pancreas were 25, 150, seven, 255, 51, five, and 35, respectively. Open surgery was performed in 303 patients vs. laparoscopic surgery in 225 patients. An incisional SSI occurred in 46 patients (8.7%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that postoperative hyperglycemia (serum glucose level ≥140 mg/dl within 24 h after surgery), colorectal malignancy, and open surgery were independent risk factors for incisional SSI. In a subgroup analysis of patients with colorectal malignancy, incisional SSI occurred in 27 (11%) patients. Open surgery was significantly correlated with the occurrence of incisional SSI (P = 0.024).ConclusionsPostoperative hyperglycemia and open surgery were significant risk factors for SSI in patients with gastroenterological malignancies. Minimally invasive surgery could reduce the occurrence of incisional SSI

Clinical impact of margin status on survival and recurrence pattern after curative-intent surgery for pancreatic cancer

Summary: Background/Objective: The definition of R0 resection for invasive pancreatic ductal carcinoma (IPDC) is important. However, there are different definitions among several countries in the world. Methods: From 2001 to 2015, 100 consecutive patients with IPDC who underwent pancreatic resection in our hospital were enrolled. We compared survival and recurrence patterns between the R0 group and R1 group based on the UICC (Union for International Cancer Control) classification (current-R0 vs. current-R1) and based on our revised classification, which defines R0 as a surgical margin of >1 mm (revised-R0 vs. revised-R1). Results: The 100 patients comprised 58 males and 42 females, and their median age was 70 [32–87]. There were 84 patients in the current-R0 group and 43 in the revised-R0 group. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the current-R0 group and current-R1 group. However, there was a tendency toward a higher OS rate in the revised-R0 than revised-R1 group (log-rank p = 0.065), and RFS was significantly better in the revised-R0 than revised-R1 group (log-rank p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the recurrence patterns between the current-R0 and current-R1 groups. In contrast, the local recurrence rate was significantly lower in the revised-R0 than revised-R1 group (21% vs. 42%, respectively; p = 0.026). Conclusion: The revised classification of surgical resection may be more useful than the current UICC classification for prediction of prognosis and local recurrence of IPDC. Keywords: Pancreatic cancer, Pancreatic surgery, Prognostic factor, Surgical margin statu

A multi-institution phase II study of gemcitabine/cisplatin/S-1 (GCS) combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (KHBO 1002).

[Purpose]Gemcitabine/cisplatin combination therapy has been the standard palliative chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding S-1 to gemcitabine/cisplatin combination therapy for patients with advanced BTC. [Methods]Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed unresectable or recurrent BTC were eligible for inclusion. The primary end point was overall survival. Based on the results of our preceding phase I study, gemcitabine and cisplatin were administered intravenously at doses of 1, 000 or 25 mg/m2, respectively, on day 1, and oral S-1 was administered daily at a dose of 80 mg/m2 on days 1–7 every 2 weeks. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01284413) and the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (ID 000004468). [Results]Fifty patients enrolled between October 2011 and August 2012 were evaluated. After a median follow-up of 15.1 months (range 2.4–24.4 months), the median overall survival time was 16.2 months [95 % confidence interval (CI) 10.2–22.2 months], and the one-year overall survival rate was 59.9 % (95 % CI 46.2–73.5 %). The grade 3–4 hematological toxicities were as follows: neutropenia (32 %), anemia (32 %), thrombocytopenia (10 %), and febrile neutropenia (4 %). The common grade 3–4 non-hematological toxicities were biliary tract infection (14 %), anorexia/nausea (10 %), and fatigue (8 %). [Conclusions]Gemcitabine/cisplatin/S-1 combination chemotherapy offered a promising survival benefit with manageable toxicity in patients with advanced BTC. A randomized phase III trial to investigate the efficacy of this regimen compared to gemcitabine/cisplatin combination therapy in patients with advanced BTC is now underway (UMIN000014371/NCT02182778)