19 research outputs found
Secondary analyses of the randomized phase III Stop&Go study: efficacy of second-line intermittent versus continuous chemotherapy in HER2-negative advanced breast cancer
Background: Previously, we showed that reintroduction of the same (first-line) chemotherapy at progression could only partially make up for the loss in efficacy as compared to continuously delivered first-line chemotherapy. Here, we report the probability of starting second-line study chemotherapy in the Stop&Go trial, and the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients who received both the first- and second-line treatment in an intermittent versus continuous schedule. Methods: First-line chemotherapy comprised paclitaxel plus bevacizumab, second-line capecitabine or non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, given per treatment line as two times four cycles (intermittent) or as eight consecutive cycles (continuous). Results: Of the 420 patients who started first-line treatment within the Stop&Go trial (210:210), a total of 270 patients continued on second-line study treatment (64% of all), which consisted of capecitabine in 201 patients and of non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in 69 patients, evenly distributed between the treatment arms. Median PFS was 3.7 versus 5.0 months (HR 1.07; 95% CI: 0.82â1.38) and median OS 10.9 versus 12.4 months (HR 1.27; 95% CI: 0.98â1.66) for intermittent versus continuous second
How to fit the treatment to the breast cancer patient
In this thesis a number of tumor and patient characteristics, treatment options with emphasis on chemotherapy and several aspects of quality of life and long term toxicities are discussed. The optimization of standard adjuvant CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) with help of a growth factor is described, but the main part of the thesis concerns the experience woth high dose chemotherapy in combination with ABMT and/or PSCT and growth factors. ...
Zie: Summary conclusions and further remarks
Ectopic expression of target genes may represent an inherent limitation of RTâPCR assays used for micrometastasis detection: studies on the epithelial glycoprotein gene EGPâ2
Dose Intensity of Standard Adjuvant CMF with Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor for Premenopausal Patients with Node-Positive Breast Cancer
Patients homozygous for DPYD c.1129-5923C>G/haplotype B3 have partial DPD deficiency and require a dose reduction when treated with fluoropyrimidines
Purpose: Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is a critical determinant of 5-fluorouracil pharmacology, and reduced activity of DPD as a result of deleterious polymorphisms in the gene encoding DPD (DPYD) can result in severe treatment-related toxicity. Dosing recommendations to individualize treatment have been provided for three DPYD variants (DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, and c.1679T>G). A fourth variant, c.1129-5923C>G/HapB3, has been shown to increase the risk of fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity, but little is known about the functional effects of this variant. Methods: By performing a large retrospective screen for DPYD variants, we identified three patients who were homozygous for c.1129-5923C>G/HapB3. We describe their clinical course of treatment and analyzed DPD activity and DPYD gene expression, to provide insight into the phenotypic effects of c.1129-5923C>G/HapB3. Results: DPD activity could be measured in two patients and was 4.1 and 5.4ĂÂ nmol/mg/h (DPD activity 41 and 55ĂÂ % compared to controls, respectively). The fluoropyrimidine dose had to be reduced during treatment in both patients. In line with partial DPD deficiency in both patients, sequence analysis of DPD cDNA demonstrated a normal-sized (wild type) cDNA fragment of 486 bp, as well as a larger-sized (mutant) 530-bp fragment containing an aberrant 44-bp insertion in intron 10. Patient three tolerated treatment well, but DPD activity measurement was not possible as the patient had deceased at the time of performing the study. Conclusions: The presented functional and clinical data indicate that the c.1129-5923C>G variant is both functionally and clinically relevant, and support an upfront dose reduction of the fluoropyrimidine starting dose in patients carrying c.1129-5923C>G homozygously
Weekly docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients:No superior benefits compared to three-weekly docetaxel
Background: In anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, it is unknown whether weekly single-agent docetaxel is preferable to 3-weekly docetaxel regarding its toxicity and efficacy profile. Patients and methods: In this multicenter, randomised, open-label phase III trial, 162 patients were randomised to weekly docetaxel (group A) or 3-weekly docetaxel (group B). The primary end-point was tolerability; secondary end-points were efficacy and quality of life (QoL). Results: Group A (weekly docetaxel, n = 79) experienced less haematological toxicity, with just 1.3% versus 16.9% febrile neutropenia in group B (3-weekly docetaxel, n = 77) (p = 0.001). Not this difference, but fatigue and general malaise foremost led to more patient withdrawals in group A (24 versus 12 patients, p = 0.032), less patients completing treatment (29 versus 43 patients, p = 0.014) and reduced dose-intensity (15.6 versus 26 mg/m(2)/week, 58% versus 70% of projected dose, p = 0.017). As a result, 3-weekly docetaxel was related to better overall survival in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.70, p = 0.036), although in univariate analysis efficacy was similar in both groups. Reported QoL was similar in both groups, but less effective treatment with more general toxicity led to less completed QoL forms in group A (65.4% versus 50%, p = 0.049). Conclusion: Weekly docetaxel is less well tolerated than a 3-weekly schedule, due to more non-haematological toxicity, despite less febrile neutropenia. Also, no efficacy benefits can be demonstrated for weekly docetaxel, which may even be inferior based on multivariate analysis. Therefore, a 3-weekly schedule should be preferred in the setting of MBC. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
Extended adjuvant aromatase inhibition after sequential endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer:follow-up analysis of the randomised phase 3 DATA trial
Background: The DATA study evaluated the use of two different durations of anastrozole in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who were disease-free after 2â3 years of tamoxifen. We hereby present the follow-up analysis, which was performed after all patients reached a minimum follow-up of 10 years beyond treatment divergence. Methods: The open-label, randomised, phase 3 DATA study was performed in 79 hospitals in the Netherlands (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00301457). Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who were disease-free after 2â3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment were assigned to either 3 or 6 years of anastrozole (1 mg orally once a day). Randomisation (1:1) was stratified by hormone receptor status, nodal status, HER2 status, and prior tamoxifen duration. The primary outcome was adapted disease-free survival, defined as disease-free survival from 3 years after randomisation onwards. Adapted overall survival was assessed as a secondary outcome. Analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat design. Findings: Between June 28, 2006, and August 10, 2009, 1912 patients were randomly assigned to 3 years (n = 955) or 6 years (n = 957) of anastrozole. Of these, 1660 patients were eligible and disease-free at 3 years after randomisation. The 10-year adapted disease-free survival was 69.2% (95% CI 55.8â72.3) in the 6-year group (n = 827) and 66.0% (95% CI 62.5â69.2) in the 3-year group (n = 833) (hazard ratio (HR) 0.86; 95% CI 0.72â1.01; p = 0.073). The 10-year adapted overall survival was 80.9% (95% CI 77.9â83.5) in the 6-year group and 79.2% (95% CI 76.2â81.9) in the 3-year group (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.75â1.16; p = 0.53). Interpretation: Extended aromatase inhibition beyond 5 years of sequential endocrine therapy did not improve the adapted disease-free survival and adapted overall survival of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Funding: AstraZeneca