11 research outputs found

    Significance of changes in plasma adiponectin concentration after the implantation of stents in patients with stable angina

    Get PDF
    SummaryObjectiveAlthough plasma adiponectin levels may be a marker for the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) and can help to predict future cardiovascular events in patients with CAD, the significance of changes in plasma adiponectin levels after the implantation of stents in patients with stable angina is unclear.MethodsThe subjects included 32 consecutive patients with stable angina who had undergone successful coronary stenting [bare metal stent (BMS, n=16) or sirolimus-eluting stent (SES, n=16)]. Blood sampling was performed at baseline, and at 24h, 48h, 14 days and 6 months after stenting.ResultsPlasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels at baseline (0.16±0.15mg/dl) were significantly increased at 24h (0.36±0.45mg/dl, p=0.011) and 48h (1.01±1.01mg/dl, p<0.001), and plasma adiponectin levels at baseline (6.7±4.2μg/ml) were significantly decreased at 24h (6.1±4.2μg/ml, p=0.019) and 48h (6.2±4.9μg/ml, p=0.010) in all subjects. Although there were no significant differences in changes in plasma hs-CRP and adiponectin levels between BMS and SES groups during the study period, BMS group (6.5±0.9μg/ml at baseline) showed a significant reduction of plasma adiponectin at 48h (5.8±1.1μg/ml, p=0.022) and 6 months after stenting (4.7±2.3μg/ml, p=0.011). Percent diameter stenosis (%DS) at 6 months after stenting was negatively correlated with changes in the plasma adiponectin levels within 6 months [Δadiponectin (6 months−baseline)]. In addition, multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the %DS at 6 months after stenting was most closely correlated with Δadiponectin (6 months−baseline) after adjusting for age, sex and body mass index.ConclusionsCoronary stenting may decrease circulating adiponectin in association with an inflammatory response. The changes in plasma levels of adiponectin after stenting may also be a predictor of coronary restenosis in patients with CAD

    Associations between microalbuminuria and parameters of flow-mediated vasodilatation obtained by continuous measurement approaches

    No full text
    The associations between microalbuminuria and various parameters of flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD) are not completely understood. We retrospectively analyzed 265 consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography and in whom we could measure FMD and the urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR). Using 15 continuous measurement approaches, we measured FMD as the magnitude of the percentage change in the brachial artery diameter from baseline to peak (bFMD), the maximum FMD rate calculated as the maximal slope of dilation (FMD-MDR), and the integrated FMD response calculated as the area under the dilation curve during the 60- and 120-s dilation periods (FMD-AUC60 and FMD-AUC120). We divided the patients into two groups according to UACR: normoalbuminuria (NOR, n = 211) and microalbuminuria (MIC, n = 54). The MIC group showed a significantly higher percentage of coronary artery disease than the NOR group. FMD-AUC60 and FMD-AUC120, but not FMD-MDR, in the MIC group were significantly lower than those in the NOR group. On the other hand, bFMD in the MIC group tended to be lower than that in the NOR group, but this difference was not significant. A multiple regression analysis indicated that FMD-AUC120 and diabetes mellitus were predictors of MIC. Finally, we defined the cut-off value of FMD-AUC120 for the presence of MIC in all patients as 8.4 mm x second (sensitivity 0.640, specificity 0.588) by a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. In conclusion, this study provides more definitive evidence for the association of microalbuminuria with endothelial dysfunction. FMD-AUC120 may be a superior marker for MIC
    corecore