Meaningful outcomes for children and their caregivers attending a paediatric brain centre

Aim: To identify meaningful outcomes of children and their caregivers attending a paediatric brain centre. Method: We compiled a long list of outcomes of health and functioning of children with brain-related disorders such as cerebral palsy, spina bifida, (genetic) neurodevelopmental disorders, and acquired brain injury. We incorporated three perspectives: patients, health care professionals, and published outcome sets. An aggregated list was categorized using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: Children and Youth version in a patient validation survey for children and parent-caregivers to prioritize outcomes. Outcomes were considered meaningful when ranked ‘very important’ by 70% or more of the participants. Results: We identified 104 outcomes from the three perspectives. After categorizing, 59 outcomes were included in the survey. Thirty-three surveys were completed by children (n = 4), caregivers (n = 24), and parent-caregivers together with their child (n = 5). Respondents prioritized 27 meaningful outcomes covering various aspects of health and functioning: emotional well-being, quality of life, mental and sensory functions, pain, physical health, and activities (communication, mobility, self-care, interpersonal relationships). Parent-caregiver concerns and environmental factors were newly identified outcomes. Interpretation: Children and parent-caregivers identified meaningful outcomes covering various aspects of health and functioning, including caregiver concerns and environmental factors. We propose including those in future outcome sets for children with neurodisability. What this paper adds: Outcomes that children with brain-related disorders and their parent-caregivers consider to be the most meaningful cover a wide range of aspects of functioning. Involving these children and their parent-caregivers resulted in the identification of important outcomes that were not covered by professionals and the literature. Parent-caregiver-related factors (coping, burden of care) and environmental factors (support, attitudes, and [health care] services) were identified as meaningful.</p

Vertical distraction of the severely resorbed mandible - The Groningen Distraction Device

In this paper, both the surgical procedure and the clinical results of a novel distraction device to augment a severely resorbed anterior edentulous mandible are described. The distraction device is non-voluminous, and consists of two distraction screws and one guide screw. Two months after the last day of distraction, both distraction screws are replaced by endosseous implants and the guide screw is removed. Three months after implantation, the prosthetic treatment can be started. So far three patients have been treated. In all patients, the severely resorbed mandible (mandibular height in the canine region: 5, 6 and 7 mm, respectively) could be sufficiently enlarged to enable reliable insertion of endosseous implants with a length of at least 12 mm, No complications occurred. Biopsies taken from the distraction site revealed formation of lamellar bone parallel to the distraction vector. From this preliminary study it is concluded that the Groningen vertical distraction device has the potential for reliable augmentation of the anterior segment of a severely resorbed edentulous mandible to enable insertion of endosseous implants with adequate length and primary stability