Cyclosporin A in psoriasis

Although a large therapeutic arsenal of conventional drugs is available to treat patients with psoriasis, a group of patients still exists that fulfill the inherent exclusion criteria or present with subjective or objective side-effects. This necessitates the need for controlled studies with potential new antipsoriatic drugs like cyclosporin A. In this thesis patientoriented studies on the treatment of severe psoriasis vulgaris with systemic low-dose and topical cyclosporin A are presented in an attempt to answer the following questions. A - What is the efficacy of short-term low-dose cyclosporin A in patients with severe, recalcitrant psoriasis ? (Chapters 3 and 4) B - Is there a preferential dose regimen for long-term treatment, either continous or intermittent ? Can the combination with a conventional drug like etretinate produce an additive positive effect ? (Chapter 5) C- Can topically applied cyclosporin A be effective in dermatologic disorders such as psoriasis ? (Chapter 6) D - What are the side-effects of orally administered cyclosporin A ? How can nephrotoxocity be monitored ? What are the recommended guidelines for the practicing dermatologist for using cyclosporin A ? (Chapters 7 and 8

Cyclosporin in atopic dermatitis: A multicentre placebo-controlled study

The efficacy of cyclosporin (Sandimmun®) given in a daily dose of 5 mg/kg for 6 weeks in severe atopic dermatitis was confirmed in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, short-term study. Of the 46 patients included in the study, 23 were randomized to receive cyclosporin and 23 to receive placebo. Four of the 23 patients (17%) on cyclosporin, and 14 of the 23 patients (61%) who received placebo, discontinued the trial because of inefficacy. All patients who discontinued the trial were assessed following the principle the principle of ‘intention to treat’. Compared with the baseline, the mean scores for disease severity [6-area, total body severity assessment (TBSA)] improved by 55%, and the mean scores for extent of disease [rule-of-nines area assessment (RoNAA)] improved by 40%, in patients treated with cyclosporin. Nine of the patients who received cyclosporin and completed the study (n=14) had an individual reduction of disease severity (TBSA) of 75% or more, and in three patients this reduction was nearly 100%. In the placebo group, a mean worsening of disease severity (4%) and of extent of the disease (25%), compared with the baseline, was observed al week 6. Patients' and investigators' mean scores for the overall efficacy were similar, and showed a statistically significant difference in favour of cyclosporin. Two patients on cyclosporin developed hypertension during therapy, and one of these withdrew from the study. At the end of the trial, no statistically significant differences in the systolic or diastolic blood pressures were observed between the two groups. In the cyclosporin group, the increases in the values of serum creatinine and bilirubin at week 6, compared with the respective values at the baseline, were statistically significantly different from those in the placebo group, but all values normalized in the post-treatment period. Cyclosporin can be a safe and very effective treatment in episodes of severe atopic dermatitis, provided that the recommended guidelines for its administration are strictly observed

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in cutaneous malignant lymphomas

Background: Lymphoid cells may express somatostatin receptors (SS-Rs) on their cell surface. Therefore radiolabeled somatostalin analogues may be used to visualize SS-R-positive lymphoid neoplasms in vivo. Exact staging is the basis for treatment decisions in cutaneous malignant lymphoma. We considered the possibility that SS-R scintigraphy might offer a clinically useful method of diagnostic imaging in patients with cutaneous malignant lymphoma. Objective: We evaluated SS-R scintigraphy in comparison with conventional staging methods in the staging of cutaneous malignant lymphoma. Methods: We conducted a prospective study in 14 consecutive patients with histologically proven cutaneous malignant lymphoma. SS-R scintigraphy was compared with physical, radiologic, and bone marrow examinations. Lymph node excisions were performed in patients with palpable lymph nodes. Results: SS-R scintigraphy was positive in the lymph nodes in all four patients with malignant lymph node infiltration and negative in the three patients with dermatopathic lymphadenopathy. In two patients, previously unsuspected lymphoma localizations were visualized by SS-R scintigraphy. In only three patients all skin lesions were visualized by SS-R scintigraphy; these three patients had not been treated with topical corticosteroids. SS-R scintigraphy failed to detect an adrenal mass in one patient and bone marrow infiltration in two patients. Conclusion: SS-R scintigraphy may help distinguish dermatopathic lymphadenopathy from malignant lymph node infiltration in patients with cutaneous malignant lymphoma