Older, Male Orthopaedic Surgeons From Southern Geographies Prescribe Higher Doses of Post-Operative Narcotics Than do their Counterparts: A Medicare Population Study

Purpose: We wanted to evaluate opioid prescribing patterns among orthopaedic surgeons and to identify demographics that may be associated with more extensive opioid prescribing habits that could be candidates for targeted education policies. Methods: Medicare Part D prescriber and prescription information for the most recent available year, 2017, was accessed via a publicly available database offered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. Number of total prescriptions, number of opioid prescriptions, and the total days\u27 supply of opioids prescribed were analyzed for each of 19,219 orthopaedic surgeons. Demographics and board certification status were also recorded. Results: Orthopaedic surgeons who wrote the most opioid prescriptions (\u3e400 per year) also wrote the longest prescription durations (14.1 days/prescription, P \u3c .05 for all comparisons). Surgeons with more than 30 years of experience wrote the longest prescriptions (11.8 days/prescription; P \u3c .001). Male surgeons wrote more opioid prescriptions than female surgeons (151 vs 95, respectively; P \u3c .001). However, female surgeons wrote longer prescriptions than male surgeons (7.5 days/prescription vs 6.1 days/prescription, respectively; P = .01). Surgeons from southern states wrote the most opioid prescriptions (1,386,897) and the longest prescriptions, with an average of 13.0 days per prescription, whereas western states wrote the shortest prescriptions at 10.4 days per prescription (P = .004). Conclusion: There are demographic correlations between orthopaedic surgeons and opioid prescribing patterns. In particular, male, older southern surgeons prescribe the highest volumes of opioids. This provides an opportunity for targeted education versus overarching, general policies. Potential directions for future investigation can focus on assessing recent trends in opioid prescriptions among orthopaedic providers. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study

Patients with Preoperative Clinical Depression Symptomology Experience Significant Improvements in Postoperative Pain, Function, and Depressive Symptoms Following Rotator Cuff Repair

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of clinical depression on outcomes following rotator cuff repair (RCR), as measured by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) health domains. METHODS: RCR patients were given PROMIS CAT assessments for physical function (PROMIS UE), pain interference (PROMIS PI), and depression (PROMIS D) during pre- and postoperative clinic visits. PROMIS D scores ≥ 55 correlate with mild clinical depression; thus, patients with PROMIS D scores ≥ 55 were placed in the clinical depression (CD) group, while patients with scores no clinical depression (NCD) group. Categorical variables were compared at preoperative and postoperative (6m and ≥1y) timepoints using chi-squared tests. Continuous variables were compared using student\u27s t-tests. RESULTS: Of the 340 RCR patients included in this study, 65 (19.1%) were found to have mild clinical depression preoperatively, with that number being reduced to 23 (6.8%) at 6m and 19 (5.6%) at ≥1y postoperatively. Compared with preoperative PROMIS scores, CD patients had significant postoperative improvements at 6m and ≥1y in mean PROMIS UE (26.7 vs 35.5 vs 38.9; p\u3c.001) and PROMIS PI (67.6 vs 56.7 vs 56.4; p\u3c.001). NCD patients had similar postoperative improvements at 6m and ≥1y in mean PROMIS UE (30.8 vs 38.6 vs 46.9; p\u3c.001) and PROMIS PI (61.7 vs 53.0 vs 47.6; p\u3c.001). The improvement in PROMIS scores was similar for the CD and NCD groups in both PROMIS UE (12.2 vs 16.1, respectively) and PROMIS PI (-11.2 vs -14.1, respectively). CONCLUSION: Despite starting with worse PROMIS UE and PROMIS PI scores, patients undergoing RCR with symptoms of CD experienced significant improvement in function, pain, and depressive symptoms. Preoperative depression should not be a contraindication to arthroscopic RCR in patients who are otherwise appropriate operative candidates

Trends in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scores Exist between Day of Surgical Scheduling and Day of Surgery

PURPOSE: To examine trends in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores among orthopedic sports medicine patients undergoing surgery who completed PROMIS forms both in the ambulatory (preoperative) setting at the time of surgical scheduling as well as on the day of surgery (perioperative) prior to their procedure. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing various sports medicine related surgery were recruited. Patients were included if they were scheduled for surgery and completed preoperative PROMIS on the day of surgical scheduling and on the day of surgery. Patients were excluded if they refused the questionnaire or had been administered perioperative anesthesia, which would interfere with questionnaire completion. Paired samples t-tests were run between preoperative and perioperative PROMIS scores to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: 153 patients were included with an average age of 46.5 years. The average (SD) time between completion of PROMIS questionnaires was 46.5 (44.4) days. The absolute value change in scores between preoperative and perioperative visits was 4.09 for PROMIS UE, 3.59 for PROMIS PF, 3.67 for PROMIS PI, and 4.13 for PROMIS D. The overall net change of scores between preoperative and perioperative visits were -.57 for PROMIS UE CAT, .16 points for PROMIS PF CAT, -.85 points for PROMIS PI CAT, and -2.14 points for PROMIS D CAT. Statistically significant differences in preoperative and perioperative PROMIS PI (p=.042) and PROMIS D (p=.004) scores were found. CONCLUSIONS: Health states - as measured by PROMIS CAT forms completed among patients undergoing orthopedic surgery - can either improve or worsen preoperatively between the time of administration in both the ambulatory and perioperative setting. Despite the existence of these preoperative trends, it is important to consider patient and surgery-specific causes, such as the anatomic region, type of surgical intervention, and timing of preoperative PROMIS administration