Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and the risk of stroke in the Netherlands:A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND: Apart from blood pressure level itself, variation in blood pressure has been implicated in the development of stroke in subgroups at high cardiovascular risk. We determined the association between visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and stroke risk in the general population, taking into account the size and direction of variation and several time intervals prior to stroke diagnosis. METHODS AND FINDINGS: From 1990 to 2016, we included 9,958 stroke-free participants of the population-based Rotterdam Study in the Netherlands. This is a prospective cohort study including participants aged 45 years and older. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) variability was calculated as absolute SBP difference divided by mean SBP over 2 sequential visits (median 4.6 years apart). Directional SBP variability was defined as SBP difference over 2 visits divided by mean SBP. Using time-varying Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, mean SBP, and cardiovascular risk factors, hazard ratios (HRs) for stroke up to January 2016 were estimated per SD increase and in tertiles of variability. We also conducted analyses with 3-, 6-, and 9-year intervals between variability measurement and stroke assessment. These analyses were repeated for diastolic blood pressure (DBP). The mean age of the study population was 67.4 ± 8.2 years and 5,776 (58.0%) were women. During a median follow-up of 10.1 years, 971 (9.8%) participants had a stroke, including 641 ischemic, 89 hemorrhagic, and 241 unspecified strokes. SBP variability was associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke (HR per SD 1.27, 95% CI 1.05–1.54, p = 0.02) and unspecified stroke (HR per SD 1.21, 95% CI 1.09–1.34, p < 0.001). The associations were stronger for all stroke subtypes with longer time intervals; the HR for any stroke was 1.29 (95% CI 1.21–1.36, p < 0.001) at 3 years, 1.47 (95% CI 1.35–1.59, p < 0.001) at 6 years, and 1.38 (95%CI 1.24–1.51, p < 0.001) at 9 years. For DBP variability, we found an association with unspecified stroke risk. Both the rise and fall of SBP and the fall of DBP were associated with an increased risk for unspecified stroke. Limitations of the study include that, due to an average interval of 4 years between visits, our findings may not be generalizable to blood pressure variability over shorter periods. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study, we found that visit-to-visit blood pressure variation was associated with an increased risk of unspecified and hemorrhagic stroke, independent of direction of variation or mean blood pressure

Quantitative Gait Impairments in Patients With Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Population-Based Approach

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Gait is a complex process involving various cortical and subcortical brain regions. An acute stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) may disrupt white and gray matter integrity and, therefore, affect gait in patients without evident neurological signs. We determined whether patients with stroke and TIA experience subtle changes in global gait and several independent gait domains. METHODS: In the population-based Rotterdam Study, 4456 participants (median age, 65 years; 55% women) underwent detailed quantitative gait assessment (GAITRite) between 2009 and 2016. We summarized 30 gait parameters into a global gait score and 7 mutually independent gait domains. First, we assessed the association between prior stroke or TIA and global and domain-specific gait using linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, vascular risk factors, and cognition. Subsequently, we repeated the analysis stratified by the presence of different neurological symptoms in a subgroup of participants with ischemic stroke after study entry. RESULTS: Compared with participants without prior stroke, patients with stroke had a worse global gait (SD, -0.49 [95% CI, -0.64 to -0.34]), especially in the gait domains Pace, Phases, and Turning. The detrimental effect of stroke on gait was amplified in participants with worse cognition. No gait differences were found between participants with and without prior TIA. Ischemic stroke patients without lower limb weakness, loss of coordination, or visuospatial problems still had a worse gait compared with participants without stroke. Stratification by different stroke symptoms showed that different gait domains were affected in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Prior stroke without neurological signs that affect gait is still associated with gait difficulties compared with individuals without stroke. Our study suggests that stroke not only has a direct impact on gait through neurological impairments but also includes an indirect effect possibly through disruption of gray and white matter integrity and accelerated neurodegeneration

Time Trends in Survival Following First Hemorrhagic or Ischemic Stroke Between 1991 and 2015 in the Rotterdam Study

Background and Purpose- The introduction of stroke units and the implementation of evidence-based interventions have been a breakthrough in the management

Orthostatic Hypotension: A Prodromal Marker of Parkinson's Disease?

Background: Orthostatic hypotension is common in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, it remains unknown whether orthostatic hypotension is a marker of prodromal PD or more advanced disease. The objectives of this study were to assess whether orthostatic hypotension is a prodromal marker of PD in the general population. Methods: This study was embedded in the Rotterdam Study, a large prospective population-based cohort in the Netherlands. We measured orthostatic hypotension in 6910 participants. First, we determined the relation between prevalent PD and orthostatic hypotension using logistic regression. Second, we followed PD-free participants for the occurrence of PD until 2016 and studied the association between orthostatic hypotension and the risk of PD using Cox proportional hazards models. All models were adjusted for age and sex. Results: At baseline, the mean age ± standard deviation of the study population was 69.0 ± 8.8 years, and 59.1% were women. Orthostatic hypotension was present in 1245 participants (19.8%), and 62 participants (1.0%) had PD at the time of orthostatic hypotension measurement. Participants with PD were significantly more likely to have orthostatic hypotension (odds ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.09–3.24). During a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 16.1 years (8.5–22.7 years), 122 participants were diagnosed with incident PD. Orthostatic hypotension at baseline was not associated with an increased risk of PD (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.59–1.58). Conclusions: Our study suggests that orthostatic hypotension is common in patients with PD, but that orthostatic hypotension is not associated with an increased risk of PD and thus is not a prodromal marker of PD in the general population