16 research outputs found

    A new modification of the chiron ACS assay for total prostate-specific antigen achieves equimolar response characteristics and improves the detection of prostate cancer

    Get PDF
    Nonequimolar-response assays for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) are criticized for overestimating total PSA in some men without prostate cancer (PCA), and underestimating total PSA in some men with PCA. We recently studied three nonequimolar-response PSA assays that had undergone modifications. While two of the studied assays achieved equimolar-response characteristics with improved areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC), the modification of the Chiron ACS PSA assay (ACS PSA2, Chiron) failed to achieve this. Recently, the ACS assay underwent another modification (ACS PSA, Bayer), which we investigated. Sera from 305 men (155 without and 150 with PCA, PSA greater than or equal to2 and less than or equal to30 mug/l, TandemE) were measured using both modifications of the ACS assay and equimolar-response reference methods (TandemR free and Tandem E, Hybritech). Molar response relative to the reference method and clinical performance (comparison of AUCs) between the previous and new ACS assay modifications were studied. The new modification of the ACS assay (ACS PSA, Bayer) achieved equimolar-response characteristics but reported lower values (average 10%) than the Tandem E assay. Compared to the previous modification (ACS PSA2, Chiron), a 3% improvement in AUC (p=0.01) was found. Using results of the redesigned equimolar-response assay (ACS PSA, Bayer), we calculated that 6 of 155 men without PCA in this sample set could be spared unnecessary biopsy compared with the previous nonequimolar-response assay (ACS PSA2, Chiron) without missing additional PCA (90% sensitivity). These data provide additional evidence for clinical advantages of equimolar-response over nonequimolar-response PSA assay formats

    Tumor percentage but not number of tumor foci predicts disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy especially in high-risk patients

    No full text
    Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of tumor volume (TV), tumor percentage (TP), and number of tumor foci (NF) in patients with prostate cancer. The prognostic relevance of TV, TP, and NF as predictors of biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RPE) is controversial. Patients and methods: The cohort consisted of 758 referred subjects who underwent RPE between 2000 and 2005 at the University of Muenster. The mean time of follow-up was 62 months. TV, TP, and NF were estimated visually with the assistance of a pathologic mapping grid for embedded whole-mount RPE specimens. In addition, TV and TP were assessed in a categorized fashion by using quartiles as cutoff points. Subgroup analyses for high- and low-risk patients using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses for BCR were performed. Results: TV, TP, and NF were strongly related to tumor stage, Gleason score, surgical margin status, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA). In univariate analysis, all pathologic parameters including TV, TP, and NF were predictive for BCR. In multivariate analysis, only TP, tumor stage, and PSA level were independent predictors. In subgroup analysis, TP was an independent predictor for BCR in the high-risk group but not in the low-risk group. Conclusions: TP, but not TV or NF, was found to be an independent predictor for BCR in patients after RPE, TP seems to be more relevant in high-risk patients (i.e., any of the following: >pT2, Gleason score >6, or PSA >20 ng/ml). (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved
    corecore