Detección automática de edificios y clasificación de usos del suelo en entornos urbanos con imágenes de alta resolución y datos LiDAR

Esta Tesis tiene como objetivo establecer una metodología fiable de detección automática de edificaciones para la clasificación automática de los usos del suelo en entornos urbanos utilizando imágenes aéreas de alta resolución y datos LiDAR. Estos datos se corresponden con la información adquirida en el marco del Plan Nacional de Ortofotografía Aérea (PNOA), y se encuentran a disposición de las administraciones públicas españolas. Para realizar la localización de edificaciones se adaptan y analizan dos técnicas empleando imágenes de alta resolución y datos LiDAR: la primera se basa en el establecimiento de valores umbral en altura y vegetación, y la segunda utiliza una aproximación mediante la clasificación orientada a objetos. La clasificación de los entornos urbanos se ha realizado empleando un enfoque orientado a objetos, definidos a partir de los límites cartográficos de las parcelas catastrales. La descripción cualitativa de los objetos para su posterior clasificación se realiza mediante un conjunto de características descriptivas especialmente diseñadas para la caracterización de entornos urbanos. La información que proporcionan estas características se refiere a la respuesta espectral de cada objeto o parcela, la textura, la altura y sus características geométricas y de forma. Además, se describe el contexto de cada objeto considerando dos niveles: interno y externo. En el nivel interno se extraen características referentes a las coberturas de edificaciones y vegetación contenidas en una parcela. En el nivel externo se calculan características globales de la manzana urbana en la que una parcela esta enmarcada. Se analiza la contribución específica de las características descriptivas en la descripción, así como su aporte en la clasificación de los usos del sueloHermosilla Gómez, T. (2011). Detección automática de edificios y clasificación de usos del suelo en entornos urbanos con imágenes de alta resolución y datos LiDAR [Tesis doctoral no publicada]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/11232Palanci

Wildfire crisis in Galicia in 2006: change in this spatial distribution model

Resume

Analysis of Implementation the Evaluation of Guidance and Counseling Program at Senior High Schools of Singkawang

Focus of this study are (1) describe and analyze the implementation of the guidance and counseling program, (2) find some factors inhibiting the implementation of the guidance and counseling program. This study uses qualitative methods; using interview data collecting technique, tested its validity through triangulation. Subjects in this study are all teachers of guidance and counseling in the Senior High School of Singkawang as many as 10 people as well as principals and supervisors as the informants with the total of 11 people. Results (1) the implementation of evaluation of guidance and counseling program by the teachers still has many weaknesses on each phase of the evaluation, such as not understanding the evaluation models of the guidance and counseling program, how to apply them, and monitoring process that is not done in deeply and in detail, (2) Some factors inhibiting the implementation of the evaluation of guidance and counseling program are lack of knowledge and understanding of the evaluation of guidance and counseling program in the schools, lack of interest in developing professional competencies, and lack of guidance to the teachers in implementing the guidance and counseling evaluation program

Assessing spectral measures of post-harvest forest recovery with field plot data

Information regarding the nature and rate of forest recovery is required to inform forest management, monitoring, and reporting activities. Delayed establishment or return of forests has implications to harvest rotations and carbon uptake, among others, creating a need for spatially-explicit, large-area, characterizations of forest recovery. Landsat time series (LTS) has been demonstrated as a means to quantitatively relate forest recovery, noting that there are gaps in our understanding of the linkage between spectral measures of forest recovery and manifestations of forest structure and composition. Field plots provide a means to better understand the linkage between forest characteristics and spectral recovery indices. As such, from a large set of existing field plots, we considered the conditions present for the year in which the co-located pixel was considered spectrally recovered using the Years to Recovery (Y2R) metric. Y2R is a long-term metric of spectral recovery that indicates the number of years required for a pixel to return to 80% of its pre-disturbance Normalized Burn Ratio value. Absolute and relative metrics of recovery at 5 years post-disturbance were also considered. We used these three spectral recovery metrics to predict the stand development class assigned by the field crew for 284 seedling plots with an overall accuracy of 73.59%, with advanced seedling stands more accurately discriminated (omission error, OE = 15.74%) than young seedling stands (OE = 49.84%). We then used field-measured attributes (e.g. height, stem density, dominant species) from the seedling plots to classify the plots into three spectral recovery groups, which were defined using the Y2R metric: spectral recovery in (1) 1–5 years, (2) 6–10 years, or (3) 11–15 years. Overall accuracy for spectral recovery groups was 61.06%. Recovery groups 1 and 3 were discriminated with greater accuracy (producer’s and user’s accuracies > 66%) than recovery group 2 ( 66%) than recovery group 2 ( 66%) than recovery group 2 (<50%). The top field-measured predictors of spectral recovery were mean height, dominant species, and percentage of stems in the plot that were deciduous. Variability in stand establishment and condition make it challenging to accurately discriminate among recovery rates within 10 years post-harvest. Our results indicate that the long-term metric Y2R relates to forest structure and composition attributes measured in the field and that spectral development post-disturbance corresponds with expectations of structural development, particularly height, for different species, site types, and deciduous abundance. These results confirm the utility of spectral recovery measures derived from LTS data to augment landscape-level assessments of post-disturbance recovery.Peer reviewe

Remote sensing for the Spanish forests in the 21st century: a review of advances, needs, and opportunities

[EN] Forest ecosystems provide a host of services and societal benefits, including carbon storage, habitat for fauna, recreation, and provision of wood or non-wood products. In a context of complex demands on forest resources, identifying priorities for biodiversity and carbon budgets require accurate tools with sufficient temporal frequency. Moreover, understanding long term forest dynamics is necessary for sustainable planning and management. Remote sensing (RS) is a powerful means for analysis, synthesis and report, providing insights and contributing to inform decisions upon forest ecosystems. In this communication we review current applications of RS techniques in Spanish forests, examining possible trends, needs, and opportunities offered by RS in a forestry context. Currently, wall-to-wall optical and LiDAR data are extensively used for a wide range of applications—many times in combination—whilst radar or hyperspectral data are rarely used in the analysis of Spanish forests. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) carrying visible and infrared sensors are gaining ground in acquisition of data locally and at small scale, particularly for health assessments. Forest fire identification and characterization are prevalent applications at the landscape scale, whereas structural assessments are the most widespread analyses carried out at limited extents. Unparalleled opportunities are offered by the availability of diverse RS data like those provided by the European Copernicus programme and recent satellite LiDAR launches, processing capacity, and synergies with other ancillary sources to produce information of our forests. Overall, we live in times of unprecedented opportunities for monitoring forest ecosystems with a growing support from RS technologies.SIPart of this work was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and University through the project AGL2016-76769-C2-1-R “Influence of natural disturbance regimes and management on forests dynamics, structure and carbon balance (FORESTCHANGE)”

Remote sensing for the Spanish forests in the 21st century: a review of advances, needs, and opportunities

[EN] Forest ecosystems provide a host of services and societal benefits, including carbon storage, habitat for fauna, recreation, and provision of wood or non-wood products. In a context of complex demands on forest resources, identifying priorities for biodiversity and carbon budgets require accurate tools with sufficient temporal frequency. Moreover, understanding long term forest dynamics is necessary for sustainable planning and management. Remote sensing (RS) is a powerful means for analysis, synthesis, and report, providing insights and contributing to inform decisions upon forest ecosystems. In this communication we review current applications of RS techniques in Spanish forests, examining possible trends, needs, and opportunities offered by RS in a forestry context. Currently, wall-to-wall optical and LiDAR data are extensively used for a wide range of applications-many times in combination-whilst radar or hyperspectral data are rarely used in the analysis of Spanish forests. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) carrying visible and infrared sensors are gaining ground in acquisition of data locally and at small scale, particularly for health assessments. Forest fire identification and characterization are prevalent applications at the landscape scale, whereas structural assessments are the most widespread analyses carried out at limited extents. Unparalleled opportunities are offered by the availability of diverse RS data like those provided by the European Copernicus programme and recent satellite LiDAR launches, processing capacity, and synergies with other ancillary sources to produce information of our forests. Overall, we live in times of unprecedented opportunities for monitoring forest ecosystems with a growing support from RS technologies.Part of this work was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, innovation and University through the project AGL2016-76769-C2-1-R "Influence of natural disturbance regimes and management on forests dynamics. structure and carbon balance (FORESTCHANGE)".Gómez, C.; Alejandro, P.; Hermosilla, T.; Montes, F.; Pascual, C.; Ruiz Fernández, LÁ.; Álvarez-Taboada, F.... (2019). Remote sensing for the Spanish forests in the 21st century: a review of advances, needs, and opportunities. Forest Systems. 28(1):1-33. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2019281-14221S133281Ungar S, Pearlman J, Mendenhall J, Reuter D, 2003. Overview of the Earth Observing-1 (EO-1) mission. IEEE T Geosci Remote 41: 1149−1159.Valbuena R, Mauro F, Arjonilla FJ, Manzanera JA, 2011. Comparing Airborne Laser Scanning-Imagery Fusion Methods Based on Geometric Accuracy in Forested Areas. Remote Sens Environ 115(8): 1942-1956.Valbuena R, Mauro F, Rodríguez-Solano R, Manzanera JA, 2012. Partial Least Squares for Discriminating Variance Components in GNSS Accuracy Obtained Under Scots Pine Canopies. Forest Sci 58(2): 139-153.Valbuena R, De Blas A, Martín Fernández S, Maltamo M, Nabuurs GJ, Manzanera JA, 2013a. Within-Species Benefits of Back-projecting Laser Scanner and Multispectral Sensors in Monospecific P. sylvestris Forests. Eur J Remote Sens 46: 401-416.Valbuena R, Maltamo M, Martín-Fernández S, Packalen P, Pascual C, Nabuurs G-J, 2013b. Patterns of covariance between airborne laser scanning metrics and Lorenz curve descriptors of tree size inequality. Can J Remote Sens 39(1): 18-31.Valbuena R, Packalen P, García-Abril A, Mehtätalo L, Maltamo M, 2013c. Characterizing Forest Structural Types and Shelterwood Dynamics from Lorenz-based Indicators Predicted by Airborne Laser Scanning. Can J For Res 43: 1063-1074.Valbuena R, Maltamo M, Packalen P, 2016a. Classification of Multi-Layered Forest Development Classes from Low-Density National Airborne LiDAR Datasets. Forestry 89: 392-341.Valbuena R, Maltamo M, Packalen P, 2016b. Classification of Forest Development Stages from National Low-Density LiDAR Datasets: a Comparison of Machine Learning Methods. Revista de Teledetección 45: 15-25.Valbuena R, Hernando A, Manzanera JA, Martínez-Falero E, García-Abril A, Mola-Yudego B, 2017a. Most Similar Neighbour Imputation of Forest Attributes Using Metrics Derived from Combined Airborne LIDAR and Multispectral Sensors. Int J Digit Earth 11 (12): 1205-1218.Valbuena R, Hernando A, Manzanera JA, Görgens EB, Almeida DRA, Mauro F, García-Abril A, Coomes DA, 2017b. Enhancing of accuracy assessment for forest above-ground biomass estimates obtained from remote sensing via hypothesis testing and overfitting evaluation. Eco Mod 622: 15-26.Valbuena-Rabadán M, Santamaría-Pe-a J, Sanz-Adán F, 2016. Estimation of diameter and height of individual trees for Pinus sylvestris L. based on the individualising of crowns using airborne LiDAR and the National Forest Inventory data. For Sys 25(1): e046Varo-Martínez MA, Navarro-Cerrillo RM, Hernández-Clemente R, Duque-Lazo J, 2017. Semi-automated stand delineation in Mediterranean Pinus sylvestris plantations through segmentation of LiDAR data: The influence of pulse density. Int J Appl Earth Obs 56: 54-64.Vázquez de la Cueva A, 2008. Structural attributes of three forest types in central Spain and Landsat ETM+ information evaluated with redundancy analysis. Int J Remote Sens 29: 5657-5676.Verdú F, Salas J, 2010. Cartografía de áreas quemadas mediante análisis visual de imágenes de satélite en la Espa-a peninsular para el periodo 1991–2005. Geofocus 10: 54–81.Viana-Soto A, Aguado I, Martínez S, 2017. Assessment of post-fire vegetation recovery using fire severity and geographical data in the Mediterranean region (Spain). Environments 4: 90.Vicente-Serrano SG, Pérez-Cabello F, Lasanta T, 2011. Pinus halepensis regeneration after a wildfire in a semiarid environment: assessment using multitemporal Landsat images. Int J Wildland Fire 20Ñ 195-208.Viedma O, Quesada J, Torres I, De Santis A, Moreno JM, 2015. Fire severity in a large fire in a Pinus pinaster forest is highly predictable from burning conditions, stand structure, and topography. Ecosystems 18: 237-250.Yebra M, Chuvieco E, 2009. Generation of a species-specific look-up table for fuel moisture content assessment. IEEE J Selected topics in applied earth observation and RS 2 (1): 21-26.White JC, Wulder MA, Varhola A, Vastaranta M, Coops NC, Cook BD, Pitt D, Woods M, 2013. A best practices guide for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Canadian Wood Fibre Centre, Victoria, BC. Information Report FI-X-010, 39 pp.White JC, Wulder MA, Hobart GW, Luther JE, Hermosilla T, Griffiths P, Coops NC, Hall RJ, Hostert P, Dyk A, Guindon L, 2014. Pixel-based image compositing for large-area dense time series applications and science. Can J Remote Sens 40 (3): 192-212.White JC, Coops NC, Wulder MA, Vastaranta M, Hilker T, Tompalski P, 2016. Remote sensing technologies for enhancing forest inventories: a review. Can J Remote Sens 42: 619-641.White JC, Wulder MA, Hermosilla T, Coops NC, Hobart GW, 2017. A nationwide characterization of 25 years of forest disturbance and recovery for Canada using Landsat time series. Remote Sens Environ 194: 303-321.Wulder MA, 1998. Optical remote-sensing techniques for the assessment of forest inventory and biophysical parameters. Progr Phys Geog 22 (4): 449-476.Wulder MA, Dymond CC, 2004. Remote sensing in survey of Mountain Pine impacts: review and recommendations. MPBI Report. Canadian Forest Service. Natural Resources Canada, Victoria, BC, Canada. 89 pp.Wulder MA, Masek JG, Cohen WB, Loveland TR, Woodcock CE, 2012. Opening the archive: how free data has enabled the science and monitoring promise of Landsat. Remote Sens Environ 122: 2-10.Wulder MA, Hilker T, White JC, Coops NC, Masek JG, Pflugmacher D, Crevier Y, 2015. Virtual constellations for global terrestrial monitoring. Remote Sens Environ 170: 62-76.Wulder MA, White JC, Loveland TR, Woodcock CE, Belward AS, Cohen WB, Fosnight EA, Shaw J, Masek JG, Roy DP, 2016. The global Landsat archive: Status, consolidation, and direction. Remote Sens Environ 185: 271-283.Xie Q, Zhu J, Wang Ch, Fu H, López-Sánchez JM, Ballester-Berman JD, 2017. A modified dual-baseline PolInSAR method for forest height estimation. Remote Sens-Basel 9 (8): 819.Xie Y, Sha Z, Yu M, 2008. Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping: a review. J Plant Ecol 1 (1): 9-23.Zald HSJ, Wulder MA, White JC, Hilker T, Hermosilla T, Hobart GW, Coops NC, 2016. Integrating Landsat pixel composites and change metrics with LiDAR plots to predictively map forest structure and aboveground biomass in Saskatchewan, Canada. Remote Sens Environ 176: 188-201.Zarco-Tejada PJ, Diaz-Varela R, Angileri V, Loudjani P, 2014. Tree height quantification using very high resolution imagery acquired from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and automatic 3D photo-reconstruction methods. Eur J Agron 55: 89-99.Zarco-Tejada PJ, Hornero A, Hernández-Clemente R, Beck PSA, 2018. Understanding the temporal dimension of the red-edge spectral region for forest decline detection using high-resolution hyperspectral and Sentinel-2A imagery. ISPRS J Photogramm 137: 134-148

Evaluation of automatic building detection approaches combining high resolution images and LiDAR data

In this paper, two main approaches for automatic building detection and localization using high spatial resolution imagery and LiDAR data are compared and evaluated: thresholding-based and object-based classification. The thresholding-based approach is founded on the establishment of two threshold values: one refers to the minimum height to be considered as building, defined using the LiDAR data, and the other refers to the presence of vegetation, which is defined according to the spectral response. The other approach follows the standard scheme of object-based image classification: segmentation, feature extraction and selection, and classification, here performed using decision trees. In addition, the effect of the inclusion in the building detection process of contextual relations with the shadows is evaluated. Quality assessment is performed at two different levels: area and object. Area-level evaluates the building delineation performance, whereas object-level assesses the accuracy in the spatial location of individual buildings. The results obtained show a high efficiency of the evaluated methods for building detection techniques, in particular the thresholding-based approach, when the parameters are properly adjusted and adapted to the type of urban landscape considered. © 2011 by the authors.The authors appreciate the financial support provided by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and FEDER in the framework of the projects CGL2009-14220 and CGL2010-19591/BTE, and the support of the Spanish Instituto Geografico Nacional (IGN).Hermosilla, T.; Ruiz Fernández, LÁ.; Recio Recio, JA.; Estornell Cremades, J. (2011). Evaluation of automatic building detection approaches combining high resolution images and LiDAR data. Remote Sensing. 3:1188-1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3061188S118812103Mayer, H. (1999). Automatic Object Extraction from Aerial Imagery—A Survey Focusing on Buildings. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 74(2), 138-149. doi:10.1006/cviu.1999.0750Kim, T., & Muller, J.-P. (1999). Development of a graph-based approach for building detection. Image and Vision Computing, 17(1), 3-14. doi:10.1016/s0262-8856(98)00092-4Irvin, R. B., & McKeown, D. M. (1989). Methods for exploiting the relationship between buildings and their shadows in aerial imagery. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 19(6), 1564-1575. doi:10.1109/21.44071Lin, C., & Nevatia, R. (1998). Building Detection and Description from a Single Intensity Image. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 72(2), 101-121. doi:10.1006/cviu.1998.0724Katartzis, A., & Sahli, H. (2008). A Stochastic Framework for the Identification of Building Rooftops Using a Single Remote Sensing Image. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46(1), 259-271. doi:10.1109/tgrs.2007.904953Lee, D. S., Shan, J., & Bethel, J. S. (2003). Class-Guided Building Extraction from Ikonos Imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 69(2), 143-150. doi:10.14358/pers.69.2.143STASSOPOULOU, A., & CAELLI, T. (2000). BUILDING DETECTION USING BAYESIAN NETWORKS. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 14(06), 715-733. doi:10.1142/s0218001400000477Jin, X., & Davis, C. H. (2005). Automated Building Extraction from High-Resolution Satellite Imagery in Urban Areas Using Structural, Contextual, and Spectral Information. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2005(14). doi:10.1155/asp.2005.2196Kim, Z., & Nevatia, R. (1999). Uncertain Reasoning and Learning for Feature Grouping. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 76(3), 278-288. doi:10.1006/cviu.1999.0803Dare, P. M. (2005). Shadow Analysis in High-Resolution Satellite Imagery of Urban Areas. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 71(2), 169-177. doi:10.14358/pers.71.2.169Weidner, U., & Förstner, W. (1995). Towards automatic building extraction from high-resolution digital elevation models. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 50(4), 38-49. doi:10.1016/0924-2716(95)98236-sCord, M., & Declercq, D. (2001). Three-dimensional building detection and modeling using a statistical approach. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 10(5), 715-723. doi:10.1109/83.918565Ma, R. (2005). DEM Generation and Building Detection from Lidar Data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 71(7), 847-854. doi:10.14358/pers.71.7.847Miliaresis, G., & Kokkas, N. (2007). Segmentation and object-based classification for the extraction of the building class from LIDAR DEMs. Computers & Geosciences, 33(8), 1076-1087. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2006.11.012Zhang, K., Yan, J., & Chen, S.-C. (2006). Automatic Construction of Building Footprints From Airborne LIDAR Data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(9), 2523-2533. doi:10.1109/tgrs.2006.874137Lafarge, F., Descombes, X., Zerubia, J., & Pierrot-Deseilligny, M. (2008). Automatic building extraction from DEMs using an object approach and application to the 3D-city modeling. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 63(3), 365-381. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.09.003Yu, B., Liu, H., Wu, J., Hu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2010). Automated derivation of urban building density information using airborne LiDAR data and object-based method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 98(3-4), 210-219. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.004Paparoditis, N., Cord, M., Jordan, M., & Cocquerez, J.-P. (1998). Building Detection and Reconstruction from Mid- and High-Resolution Aerial Imagery. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 72(2), 122-142. doi:10.1006/cviu.1998.0722Estornell, J., Ruiz, L. A., Velázquez-Martí, B., & Hermosilla, T. (2011). Analysis of the factors affecting LiDAR DTM accuracy in a steep shrub area. International Journal of Digital Earth, 4(6), 521-538. doi:10.1080/17538947.2010.533201Ruiz, L. A., Recio, J. A., Fernández-Sarría, A., & Hermosilla, T. (2011). A feature extraction software tool for agricultural object-based image analysis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 76(2), 284-296. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2011.02.007Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., & Dinstein, I. (1973). Textural Features for Image Classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-3(6), 610-621. doi:10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309314Sutton, R. N., & Hall, E. L. (1972). Texture Measures for Automatic Classification of Pulmonary Disease. IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-21(7), 667-676. doi:10.1109/t-c.1972.223572Freund, Y. (1995). Boosting a Weak Learning Algorithm by Majority. Information and Computation, 121(2), 256-285. doi:10.1006/inco.1995.1136Shufelt, J. A. (1999). Performance evaluation and analysis of monocular building extraction from aerial imagery. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21(4), 311-326. doi:10.1109/34.761262Shan, J., & Lee, S. D. (2005). Quality of Building Extraction from IKONOS Imagery. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 131(1), 27-32. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9453(2005)131:1(27

Estimation of forest structure and canopy fuel parameters from small-footprint full-waveform LiDAR data

Precise knowledge of fuel conditions is important for predicting fire hazards and simulating fire growth and intensity across the landscape. We present a methodology to retrieve and map forest canopy fuel and other forest structural parameters using small-footprint full-waveform airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data. Full-waveform LiDAR sensors register the complete returned backscattered signal through time and can describe physical properties of the intercepted objects. This study was undertaken in a mixed forest dominated by Douglas-fir, occasionally mixed with other conifers, in north-west Oregon (United States). We extracted two sets of LiDAR metrics using pulse detection and waveform modelling and then constructed several predictive models using forward stepwise multiple linear regression. The resulting models explained ~80% of the variability for many of the canopy fuel and forest structure parameters: aboveground biomass (R2 = 0.84), quadratic mean diameter (R2 = 0.82), canopy height (R2 = 0.79), canopy base height (R2 = 0.78) and canopy fuel load (R2 = 0.79). The lowest performing models included basal area (R2 = 0.76), stand volume (R2 = 0.73), canopy bulk density (R2 = 0.67) and stand density index (R2 = 0.66). Our results indicate that full-waveform LiDAR systems show promise in systematically characterising the structure and canopy fuel loads of forests, which may enable accurate fire behaviour forecasting that in turn supports the development of prevention and planning policies.This paper was developed as a result of two mobility grants funded by the Erasmus Mundus Programme of the European Commission under the Transatlantic Partnership for Excellence in Engineering (TEE Project) and the Generalitat Valenciana (BEST/2012/235). The authors appreciate the financial support provided by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation in the framework of the project CGL2010-19591/BTE. In addition, the authors thank the Panther Creek Remote Sensing and Research cooperative program for the data provided for this research, Jim Flewelling (Seattle Biometrics) and George McFadden (Bureau of Land Management) for their help in data availability and preparation.Hermosilla Gómez, T.; Ruiz Fernández, LÁ.; Kazakova, AN.; Coops, N.; Moskal, LM. (2014). Estimation of forest structure and canopy fuel parameters from small-footprint full-waveform LiDAR data. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 23(2):224-233. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF13086S224233232Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716-723. doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705Andersen, H.-E., McGaughey, R. J., & Reutebuch, S. E. (2005). Estimating forest canopy fuel parameters using LIDAR data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 94(4), 441-449. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2004.10.013Arroyo, L. A., Pascual, C., & Manzanera, J. A. (2008). Fire models and methods to map fuel types: The role of remote sensing. Forest Ecology and Management, 256(6), 1239-1252. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.048Ashworth, A., Evans, D. L., Cooke, W. H., Londo, A., Collins, C., & Neuenschwander, A. (2010). Predicting Southeastern Forest Canopy Heights and Fire Fuel Models using GLAS Data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 76(8), 915-922. doi:10.14358/pers.76.8.915Buddenbaum, H., Seeling, S., & Hill, J. (2013). Fusion of full-waveform lidar and imaging spectroscopy remote sensing data for the characterization of forest stands. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(13), 4511-4524. doi:10.1080/01431161.2013.776721Chuvieco, E., & Congalton, R. G. (1989). Application of remote sensing and geographic information systems to forest fire hazard mapping. Remote Sensing of Environment, 29(2), 147-159. doi:10.1016/0034-4257(89)90023-0CHUVIECO, E., & SALAS, J. (1996). Mapping the spatial distribution of forest fire danger using GIS. International journal of geographical information systems, 10(3), 333-345. doi:10.1080/02693799608902082Chuvieco, E., Riaño, D., Aguado, I., & Cocero, D. (2002). Estimation of fuel moisture content from multitemporal analysis of Landsat Thematic Mapper reflectance data: Applications in fire danger assessment. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(11), 2145-2162. doi:10.1080/01431160110069818Chuvieco, E., Cocero, D., Riaño, D., Martin, P., Martı́nez-Vega, J., de la Riva, J., & Pérez, F. (2004). Combining NDVI and surface temperature for the estimation of live fuel moisture content in forest fire danger rating. Remote Sensing of Environment, 92(3), 322-331. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2004.01.019Cruz, M. G., Alexander, M. E., & Wakimoto, R. H. (2003). Assessing canopy fuel stratum characteristics in crown fire prone fuel types of western North America. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 12(1), 39. doi:10.1071/wf02024Drake, J. B., Dubayah, R. O., Clark, D. B., Knox, R. G., Blair, J. B., Hofton, M. A., … Prince, S. (2002). Estimation of tropical forest structural characteristics using large-footprint lidar. Remote Sensing of Environment, 79(2-3), 305-319. doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(01)00281-4Erdody, T. L., & Moskal, L. M. (2010). Fusion of LiDAR and imagery for estimating forest canopy fuels. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(4), 725-737. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.002Falkowski, M. J., Gessler, P. E., Morgan, P., Hudak, A. T., & Smith, A. M. S. (2005). Characterizing and mapping forest fire fuels using ASTER imagery and gradient modeling. Forest Ecology and Management, 217(2-3), 129-146. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.06.013Flannigan, M. ., Stocks, B. ., & Wotton, B. . (2000). Climate change and forest fires. Science of The Total Environment, 262(3), 221-229. doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(00)00524-6García, M., Popescu, S., Riaño, D., Zhao, K., Neuenschwander, A., Agca, M., & Chuvieco, E. (2012). Characterization of canopy fuels using ICESat/GLAS data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 123, 81-89. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.03.018González-Olabarria, J.-R., Rodríguez, F., Fernández-Landa, A., & Mola-Yudego, B. (2012). Mapping fire risk in the Model Forest of Urbión (Spain) based on airborne LiDAR measurements. Forest Ecology and Management, 282, 149-156. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.056Hall, S. A., Burke, I. C., Box, D. O., Kaufmann, M. R., & Stoker, J. M. (2005). Estimating stand structure using discrete-return lidar: an example from low density, fire prone ponderosa pine forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 208(1-3), 189-209. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.12.001Harding, D. J. (2005). ICESat waveform measurements of within-footprint topographic relief and vegetation vertical structure. Geophysical Research Letters, 32(21). doi:10.1029/2005gl023471Heinzel, J., & Koch, B. (2011). Exploring full-waveform LiDAR parameters for tree species classification. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 13(1), 152-160. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2010.09.010Höfle, B., Hollaus, M., & Hagenauer, J. (2012). Urban vegetation detection using radiometrically calibrated small-footprint full-waveform airborne LiDAR data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 67, 134-147. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.12.003HYDE, P., DUBAYAH, R., PETERSON, B., BLAIR, J., HOFTON, M., HUNSAKER, C., … WALKER, W. (2005). Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using waveform lidar: Validation of montane ecosystems. Remote Sensing of Environment, 96(3-4), 427-437. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2005.03.005Keane, R. E., Burgan, R., & van Wagtendonk, J. (2001). Mapping wildland fuels for fire management across multiple scales: Integrating remote sensing, GIS, and biophysical modeling. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 10(4), 301. doi:10.1071/wf01028Kim, Y., Yang, Z., Cohen, W. B., Pflugmacher, D., Lauver, C. L., & Vankat, J. L. (2009). Distinguishing between live and dead standing tree biomass on the North Rim of Grand Canyon National Park, USA using small-footprint lidar data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(11), 2499-2510. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2009.07.010Koetz, B., Morsdorf, F., Sun, G., Ranson, K. J., Itten, K., & Allgower, B. (2006). Inversion of a Lidar Waveform Model for Forest Biophysical Parameter Estimation. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 3(1), 49-53. doi:10.1109/lgrs.2005.856706Lefsky, M. A., Cohen, W. B., Acker, S. A., Parker, G. G., Spies, T. A., & Harding, D. (1999). Lidar Remote Sensing of the Canopy Structure and Biophysical Properties of Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forests. Remote Sensing of Environment, 70(3), 339-361. doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(99)00052-8Listopad, C. M. C. S., Drake, J. B., Masters, R. E., & Weishampel, J. F. (2011). Portable and Airborne Small Footprint LiDAR: Forest Canopy Structure Estimation of Fire Managed Plots. Remote Sensing, 3(7), 1284-1307. doi:10.3390/rs3071284Mallet, C., & Bretar, F. (2009). Full-waveform topographic lidar: State-of-the-art. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 64(1), 1-16. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2008.09.007Morsdorf, F., Meier, E., Kötz, B., Itten, K. I., Dobbertin, M., & Allgöwer, B. (2004). LIDAR-based geometric reconstruction of boreal type forest stands at single tree level for forest and wildland fire management. Remote Sensing of Environment, 92(3), 353-362. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2004.05.013Neuenschwander, A. L. (2009). Landcover classification of small-footprint, full-waveform lidar data. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 3(1), 033544. doi:10.1117/1.3229944Reich, R. M., Lundquist, J. E., & Bravo, V. A. (2004). Spatial models for estimating fuel loads in the Black Hills, South Dakota, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 13(1), 119. doi:10.1071/wf02049Reitberger, J., Krzystek, P., & Stilla, U. (2008). Analysis of full waveform LIDAR data for the classification of deciduous and coniferous trees. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(5), 1407-1431. doi:10.1080/01431160701736448Riaño, D., Chuvieco, E., Salas, J., Palacios-Orueta, A., & Bastarrika, A. (2002). Generation of fuel type maps from Landsat TM images and ancillary data in Mediterranean ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 32(8), 1301-1315. doi:10.1139/x02-052Riaño, D. (2003). Modeling airborne laser scanning data for the spatial generation of critical forest parameters in fire behavior modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86(2), 177-186. doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(03)00098-1Riaño, D., Chuvieco, E., Condés, S., González-Matesanz, J., & Ustin, S. L. (2004). Generation of crown bulk density for Pinus sylvestris L. from lidar. Remote Sensing of Environment, 92(3), 345-352. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.12.014Riaño, D., Chuvieco, E., Ustin, S. L., Salas, J., Rodríguez-Pérez, J. R., Ribeiro, L. M., … Fernández, H. (2007). Estimation of shrub height for fuel-type mapping combining airborne LiDAR and simultaneous color infrared ortho imaging. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 16(3), 341. doi:10.1071/wf06003SKOWRONSKI, N., CLARK, K., NELSON, R., HOM, J., & PATTERSON, M. (2007). Remotely sensed measurements of forest structure and fuel loads in the Pinelands of New Jersey. Remote Sensing of Environment, 108(2), 123-129. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.032Skowronski, N. S., Clark, K. L., Duveneck, M., & Hom, J. (2011). Three-dimensional canopy fuel loading predicted using upward and downward sensing LiDAR systems. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(2), 703-714. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2010.10.012Van Leeuwen, M., & Nieuwenhuis, M. (2010). Retrieval of forest structural parameters using LiDAR remote sensing. European Journal of Forest Research, 129(4), 749-770. doi:10.1007/s10342-010-0381-4Vaughn, N. R., Moskal, L. M., & Turnblom, E. C. (2012). Tree Species Detection Accuracies Using Discrete Point Lidar and Airborne Waveform Lidar. Remote Sensing, 4(2), 377-403. doi:10.3390/rs4020377Wagner, W., Hollaus, M., Briese, C., & Ducic, V. (2008). 3D vegetation mapping using small‐footprint full‐waveform airborne laser scanners. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(5), 1433-1452. doi:10.1080/01431160701736398Wilson, B. A., Ow, C. F. Y., Heathcott, M., Milne, D., McCaffrey, T. M., Ghitter, G., & Franklin, S. E. (1994). Landsat MSS Classification of Fire Fuel Types in Wood Buffalo National Park, Northern Canada. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 4(2), 33. doi:10.2307/2997751Zhao, K., Popescu, S., Meng, X., Pang, Y., & Agca, M. (2011). Characterizing forest canopy structure with lidar composite metrics and machine learning. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(8), 1978-1996. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.04.00

Remote Sensing of Environment: Current status of Landsat program, science, and applications

Formal planning and development of what became the first Landsat satellite commenced over 50 years ago in 1967. Now, having collected earth observation data for well over four decades since the 1972 launch of Landsat- 1, the Landsat program is increasingly complex and vibrant. Critical programmatic elements are ensuring the continuity of high quality measurements for scientific and operational investigations, including ground systems, acquisition planning, data archiving and management, and provision of analysis ready data products. Free and open access to archival and new imagery has resulted in a myriad of innovative applications and novel scientific insights. The planning of future compatible satellites in the Landsat series, which maintain continuity while incorporating technological advancements, has resulted in an increased operational use of Landsat data. Governments and international agencies, among others, can now build an expectation of Landsat data into a given operational data stream. International programs and conventions (e.g., deforestation monitoring, climate change mitigation) are empowered by access to systematically collected and calibrated data with expected future continuity further contributing to the existing multi-decadal record. The increased breadth and depth of Landsat science and applications have accelerated following the launch of Landsat-8, with significant improvements in data quality. Herein, we describe the programmatic developments and institutional context for the Landsat program and the unique ability of Landsat to meet the needs of national and international programs. We then present the key trends in Landsat science that underpin many of the recent scientific and application developments and followup with more detailed thematically organized summaries. The historical context offered by archival imagery combined with new imagery allows for the development of time series algorithms that can produce information on trends and dynamics. Landsat-8 has figured prominently in these recent developments, as has the improved understanding and calibration of historical data. Following the communication of the state of Landsat science, an outlook for future launches and envisioned programmatic developments are presented. Increased linkages between satellite programs are also made possible through an expectation of future mission continuity, such as developing a virtual constellation with Sentinel-2. Successful science and applications developments create a positive feedback loop—justifying and encouraging current and future programmatic support for Landsat

Automatic building detection and land use classification in urban areas using multispectral high-spatial resolution imagery and LiDAR data

Advisor/s: Luis A. Ruiz. Date and location of the PhD thesis defense: 8 July 2011, Universitat Politècnica de València.Urban areas areimportant environments, accounting for approximately half the population of theworld. Cities attract residents partly because they offer ample opportunitiesfor development, which often results in urban sprawl and its complex environmentalimplications. It is therefore necessary to develop technologies andmethodologies that permit monitoring the effects of various problems that havebeen or are thought to be associated with urban sprawl. These technologieswould facilitate the adoption of policies seeking to minimize the negativeeffects of urban sprawl. Solutions require a precise knowledge of the urbanenvironment under consideration to enable the development of more efficienturban zoning plans. The high dynamism of urban areas produces seeminglycontinuous alterations of land cover and use; consequently, cartographicinformation becomes quickly and is oftentimes outdated. Hence, the availabilityof detailed and up-to-date cartographic and geographic information is imperativefor an adequate management and planning of urban areas. Usually the process ofcreating land-use/land-cover maps of urban areas involves field visits andclassical photo-interpretation techniques employing aerial imagery. Thesemethodologies are expensive, time consuming, and also subjective. Digital imageprocessing techniques help reduce the volume of information that needs to bemanually interpreted.The aim of thisstudy is to establish a methodology to automatically detect buildings and toautomatically classify land use in urban environments using multispectralhigh-spatial resolution imagery and LiDAR data. These data were acquired in theframework of the Spanish National Plan for Airborne Orthophotographs, having beenavailable for public Spanish administrations.Two mainapproaches for automatic building detection and localization using high spatialresolution imagery and LiDAR data are evaluated The thresholding-based approachis founded on the establishment of two threshold values: one is the minimumheight to be considered as a building, defined using the LiDAR data; the other isthe presence of vegetation, defined with the spectral response. The otherapproach follows the standard scheme of object-based image classification:segmentation, feature extraction and selection, and classification, hereperformed using decision trees. In addition, the effect of including contextualrelations with shadows in the building detection process is evaluated. Qualityassessment is performed at both area and object levels. Area-level assessments evaluatethe building delineation performance whereas object-level assessments evaluatethe accuracy in the spatial location of individual buildings.Urban land-useclassification is achieved by applying object-based image analysis techniques.Objects are defined using the boundaries of cadastral plots. The plots were characterizedto achieve the classification by employing a descriptive feature setspecifically designed to describe urban environments. The proposed descriptivefeatures aim to emulate human cognition by numerically quantifying theproperties of the image elements and so enable each to be distinguishable.These features describe each plot as a single entity based on several aspectsthat reflect the information used: spectral, three-dimensional, and geometrictypologies. In addition, a set of contextual features at both the internal andexternal levels is defined. Internal context features describe an object withrespect to the land cover types contained within the plots, which were, in thiscase, buildings and vegetation. External context features characterise eachobject by considering the common properties of adjacent objects that, whencombined, create an aggregate in a higher level than plot level: urban blocks.Results show that thresholding-based building detection approachperforms better in the different scenarios assessed. This method produces amore accurate building delineation and object detection than the object-basedclassification method. The building type appears as a key factor in thebuilding detection performance. Thus, urban and industrial areas show betteraccuracies in detection metrics than suburban areas, due to the small size ofsuburban constructions, combined with the prominent presence of trees insuburban classes, hindering the building detection process. The relationsbetween buildings and shadows improve the object-level detection, removingsmall objects erroneously detected as buildings that negatively affect to thequality indices.Classificationtest results show that internal and external context features complement theimage-derived features, improving the classification accuracy values of urbanclasses, especially between classes that show similarities in their image-basedand three-dimensional features. Context features enable a superiordiscrimination of suburban building typologies, of planned urban areas andhistorical areas, and also of planned urban areas and isolated buildings.The outcomes showthat these automatic methodologies are especially suitable for computing usefulinformation for constructing and updating land-use/land-cover geospatialdatabases. Digital image processing-based methodologies provide better resultsthan visual interpretation-based methods. Thus, automatic building detectiontechniques produce a superior estimation of built-up surface in an objectivemanner, independent of human operators. The combination of building detectionand automatic classification of land use in urban areas enable the distinguishingand describing of different urban typologies, contributing to greater accuracyand information than standard visual interpretation-based techniques. Theproposed methodology, based on an automated descriptive feature extraction fromLiDAR images and data, is appropriate for city mapping, urban landscapecharacterisation and management, and the updating of geospatial databases, allof which provide novel tools to increase the frequency and efficiency of thestudy of complex urban areas