A monoclinic polymorph of 4-(2H-1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-1-(4-methylphenyl)-1H-pyrazol-5-amine

The title compound, C17H15N3O2, is a monoclinic polymorph (P21/c with Z′ = 1) of the previously reported triclinic (P-1 with Z′ = 2) form [Gajera et al. (2013). Acta Cryst. E69, o736–o737]. The molecule in the monoclinic polymorph features a central pyrazolyl ring with an N-bound p-tolyl group and a C-bound 1,3-benzodioxolyl fused-ring system on either side of the C atom bearing the amino group. The dihedral angles between the central ring and the N- and C-bound rings are 50.06 (5) and 27.27 (5)°, respectively. The angle between the pendent rings is 77.31 (4)°, indicating the molecule has a twisted conformation. The five-membered dioxolyl ring has an envelope conformation with the methylene C atom being the flap. The relative disposition of the amino and dioxolyl substituents is syn. One of the independent molecules in the triclinic form has a similar syn disposition but the other has an anti arrangement of these substituents. In the crystal structure of the monoclinic form, molecules assemble into supramolecular helical chains via amino–pyrazolyl N—H...N hydrogen bonds. These are linked into layers via C—H...π interactions, and layers stack along the a axis with no specific interactions between them

Molecular anchors in the solid state: Restriction of intramolecular rotation boosts emission efficiency of luminogen aggregates to unity

Introduction of freely rotatable tetraphenylethene (TPE) to conventional luminophors quenches their light emissions in the solutions but endows the resultant molecules (TPEArs) with aggregation-induced emission characteristics in the condensed phase due to the restriction of intramolecular rotation. High fluorescence quantum yields up to 100% have been achieved in the films of TPEArs

Supplementary data for article: Chongboriboon, N.; Samakun, K.; Inprasit, T.; Kielar, F.; Dungkaew, W.; Wong, L. W.-Y.; Sung, H. H.-Y.; Ninković, D. B.; Zarić, S. D.; Chainok, K. Two-Dimensional Halogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks Based on the Tetrabromobenzene-1,4-Dicarboxylic Acid Building Molecule. CrystEngComm 2019, 22 (1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ce01140d

Supplementary material for: [https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ce01140d]Related to published version: [http://cherry.chem.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3795

Ferrocene-Decorated Hyperbranched Poly(aroxycarbonylphenylene)s: Synthesis, Light Refraction, Photopatterning and Precursor to Magnetic Ceramics

Ferrocene-decorated hyperbranched poly[1,3,5-tri(aroycarbonyl)phenylene]s (hb-PTACPs) are prepared in moderate yields with high molecular weights by one-pot polycyclotrimerization of 4,4'-isopropylidenediphenyl bipropiolate with 4-(ferrocenylmethyl)phenyl propiolate in reflux dimethylformamide. All the polymers are soluble and film-forming. They enjoy high thermal stability and lost little of their weight when heated to 300 °C under nitrogen. Thin solid films of the organometallic polymers shows high refractive indices (RI = 1.7038–1.6295) in the wavelength region of 400–1,700 nm. Ceramization of the organometallic hb-PTACPs at high temperature under inert atmosphere gives iron nanoparticles with high magnetizabilities. The organometallic polymers are readily cross-linked under UV irradiation and pyrolysis of the patterned polymer films produces magnetic ceramic patterns with good shape retention

A mechanistic study of AIE processes of TPE luminogens: Intramolecular rotation vs. configurational isomerization

Chromophores containing olefinic double bonds are the core components of many important luminogen systems that show the novel photophysical effect of aggregation-induced emission (AIE). The role and extent of E–Z isomerization (EZI) of the double bond in affecting the solution emissions of the AIE luminogens (AIEgens), however, have not been fully understood. In this work, we verified the occurrence of EZI in the dilute solutions of TPE-cored AIEgens by NMR spectroscopy using elaborate experimental procedures. We further designed a TPE-fluorescein adduct to quantify that EZI plays a minor role whereas intramolecular rotation plays a major role in the emission quenching processes of the AIEgen solutions. This study fills the gap in the research on the restriction of the intramolecular rotation (RIR) mechanism for the AIE effect and provides a useful tool for the mechanistic investigation of photoluminescence processes

DLEC1 is a functional 3p22.3 tumour suppressor silenced by promoter CpG methylation in colon and gastric cancers

Promoter CpG methylation of tumour suppressor genes (TSGs) is an epigenetic biomarker for TSG identification and molecular diagnosis. We screened genome wide for novel methylated genes through methylation subtraction of a genetic demethylation model of colon cancer (double knockout of DNMT1 and DNMT3B in HCT116) and identified DLEC1 (Deleted in lung and oesophageal cancer 1), a major 3p22.3 TSG, as one of the methylated targets. We further found that DLEC1 was downregulated or silenced in most colorectal and gastric cell lines due to promoter methylation, whereas broadly expressed in normal tissues including colon and stomach, and unmethylated in expressing cell lines and immortalised normal colon epithelial cells. DLEC1 expression was reactivated through pharmacologic or genetic demethylation, indicating a DNMT1/DNMT3B-mediated methylation silencing. Aberrant methylation was further detected in primary colorectal (10 out of 34, 29%) and gastric tumours (30 out of 89, 34%), but seldom in paired normal colon (0 out of 17) and gastric (1 out of 20, 5%) samples. No correlation between DLEC1 methylation and clinical parameters of gastric cancers was found. Ectopic expression of DLEC1 in silenced HCT116 and MKN45 cells strongly inhibited their clonogenicity. Thus, DLEC1 is a functional tumour suppressor, being frequently silenced by epigenetic mechanism in gastrointestinal tumours

Probing the Reactivity of the Ce=O Multiple Bond in a Cerium(IV) Oxo Complex

The reactivity of the cerium­(IV) oxo complex [(L_OEt)₂Ce^IV(O)­(H₂O)]·MeC­(O)­NH₂ (<b>1</b>; L_OEt^– = [CoCp­{P­(O)­(OEt)₂}₃]⁻, where Cp = η⁵-C₅H₅) toward electrophiles and Brønsted acids has been investigated. The treatment of <b>1</b> with acetic anhydride afforded the diacetate complex [Ce^IV(L_OEt)₂(O₂CMe)₂] (<b>2</b>). The reaction of <b>1</b> with B­(C₆F₅)₃ yielded [Ce^IV(L_OEt)₂(Me₂CONH₂)₂]­[B­(C₆F₅)₃(OH)]₂ (<b>3</b>), in which the [B­(C₆F₅)₃(OH)]⁻ anions are H-bonded to the O-bound acetamide ligands. The treatment of <b>1</b> with HCl and HNO₃ afforded [Ce^IV(L_OEt)₂Cl₂] and [Ce^IV(L_OEt)₂(NO₃)₂], respectively. Protonation of <b>1</b> with triflic acid (HOTf) gave the diaqua complex [Ce^IV(L_OEt)₂(H₂O)₂]­(OTf)₂ (<b>4</b>), in which the triflate anions are H-bonded to the two aqua ligands. The treatment of <b>1</b> with phenol afforded the phenoxide complex [Ce^IV(L_OEt)₂(OPh)₂] (<b>5</b>). The oxo-bridged bimetallic complex [(L_OEt)₂(Me₂CONH₂)­Ce^IV(O)­NaL_OEt] (<b>6</b>) with the Ce–O_oxo and Na–O_oxo distances of 1.953(4) and 2.341(4) Å, respectively, was obtained from the reaction of <b>1</b> with [NaL_OEt]. Density functional theory calculations showed that the model complex [(L_OMe)₂Ce^IV(Me₂CONH₂)­(O)­NaL_OMe] (<b>6A</b>; L_OMe^– = [CoCp­{P­(O)­(OMe)₂}₃]⁻) contains a polarized CeO multiple bond. The energy for dissociation of the {NaL_OMe} fragment from <b>6A</b> in acetonitrile was calculated to be +33.7 kcal/mol, which is higher than that for dissociation of the H-bonded acetamide from [(L_OMe)₂Ce^IV(O)­(H₂O)]·MeC­(O)­NH₂ (<b>1A</b>) (calculated to be +17.4 kcal/mol). In hexanes containing trace water, complex <b>1</b> decomposed readily to a mixture of a tetranuclear cerium­(IV) oxo cluster, [Ce^IV₄(L_OEt)₄(μ₄-O)­(μ₂-O)₄(μ₂-OH)₂] (<b>7</b>), and a cerium­(III) complex, [Ce^III(L_OEt)₂(H₂O)₂]­[L_OEt] [<b>8</b>(L_OEt)], whereas the cerium/sodium oxo complex <b>6</b> is stable under the same conditions. The crystal structures of <b>3</b>, <b>4</b>·H₂O, <b>6</b>, and <b>8</b>(L_OEt) have been determined

Specific two-photon imaging of live cellular and deep-tissue lipid droplets by lipophilic AIEgens at ultra-low concentration

Lipid droplets are highly associated with obesity, diabetes, inflammatory disorders and cancer. A reliable two-photon dye for specific lipid droplets imaging in live cells and live tissues at ultra-low concentration has rarely been reported. In this work, four new aggregation-induced emission luminogens (AIEgens) based on the naphthalene core were designed and synthesized for specific two-photon lipid droplets staining. The new molecules, namely NAP AIEgens, exhibit large Stokes shift (>110 nm), high solid-state fluorescence quantum yield (up to 30%), good two-photon absorption cross section (45–100 GM at 860 nm), high biocompatibility and good photostability. They could specifically stain lipid droplets at ultra-low concentration (50 nM) in a short time of 15 min. Such ultra-low concentration is the lowest value for lipid droplets staining in live cells reported so far. In vitro and ex vivo two-photon imaging of lipid droplets in live cells and live mice liver tissues were successfully demonstrated. In addition, selective visualization of lipid droplets in live mice liver tissues could be achieved at a depth of about 70 μm. These excellent properties render them as promising candidates for investigating lipid droplets-associated physiological and pathological processes in live biological samples

Epigenomic analysis of aberrantly methylated genes in colorectal cancer identifies genes commonly affected by epigenetic alterations.

Methylation profiling based on bead-chip arrays is an effective method for screening aberrantly methylated genes in CRC. In addition, we identified novel methylated genes that are candidate diagnostic or prognostic markers for CRC

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure fl ux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defi ned as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (inmost higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium ) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the fi eld understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation it is imperative to delete or knock down more than one autophagy-related gene. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways so not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field