From standard therapies to monoclonal antibodies and immune checkpoint inhibitors - an update for reconstructive surgeons on common oncological cases.

Malignancies represent a persisting worldwide health burden. Tumor treatment is commonly based on surgical and/or non-surgical therapies. In the recent decade, novel non-surgical treatment strategies involving monoclonal antibodies (mAB) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been successfully incorporated into standard treatment algorithms. Such emerging therapy concepts have demonstrated improved complete remission rates and prolonged progression-free survival compared to conventional chemotherapies. However, the in-toto surgical tumor resection followed by reconstructive surgery oftentimes remains the only curative therapy. Breast cancer (BC), skin cancer (SC), head and neck cancer (HNC), and sarcoma amongst other cancer entities commonly require reconstructive surgery to restore form, aesthetics, and functionality. Understanding the basic principles, strengths, and limitations of mAB and ICI as (neo-) adjuvant therapies and treatment alternatives for resectable or unresectable tumors is paramount for optimized surgical therapy planning. Yet, there is a scarcity of studies that condense the current body of literature on mAB and ICI for BC, SC, HNC, and sarcoma. This knowledge gap may result in suboptimal treatment planning, ultimately impairing patient outcomes. Herein, we aim to summarize the current translational endeavors focusing on mAB and ICI. This line of research may serve as an evidence-based fundament to guide targeted therapy and optimize interdisciplinary anti-cancer strategies

Tocilizumab administration in cytokine release syndrome is associated with hypofibrinogenemia after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-) T cell therapy causes serious side effects including cytokine release syndrome (CRS). CRS-related coagulopathy is associated with hypofibrinogenemia that is thus far considered the result of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and liver dysfunction. We investigated incidence and risk factors for hypofibrinogenemia in 41 consecutive adult patients with hematologic malignancies (median age 69 years, range 38-83 years) receiving CAR-T cell therapy between 01/2020 and 05/2023 at the University Medical Center Regensburg. CRS occurred in 93% of patients and was accompanied by hypofibrinogenemia already from CRS grade 1. Yet, DIC and liver dysfunction mainly occurred in severe CRS (≥ grade 3). After an initial increase during CRS, fibrinogen levels dropped after administration of tocilizumab in a dose dependent manner (r = -0.44, p = 0.004). In contrast, patients who did not receive tocilizumab had increased fibrinogen levels. Logistic regression analysis identified tocilizumab as an independent risk factor for hypofibrinogenemia (odds ratio = 486, p < 0.001). We thus hypothesize that fibrinogen synthesis in CRS is upregulated in an interleukin-6-dependent acute phase reaction compensating for CRS-induced consumption of coagulation factors. Tocilizumab inhibits fibrinogen upregulation resulting in prolonged hypofibrinogenemia. These observations provide novel insights into the pathophysiology of hypofibrinogenemia following CAR-T cell therapy and emphasize the need for close fibrinogen monitoring after tocilizumab treatment of CRS

From standard therapies to monoclonal antibodies and immune checkpoint inhibitors – an update for reconstructive surgeons on common oncological cases

Malignancies represent a persisting worldwide health burden. Tumor treatment is commonly based on surgical and/or non-surgical therapies. In the recent decade, novel non-surgical treatment strategies involving monoclonal antibodies (mAB) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been successfully incorporated into standard treatment algorithms. Such emerging therapy concepts have demonstrated improved complete remission rates and prolonged progression-free survival compared to conventional chemotherapies. However, the in-toto surgical tumor resection followed by reconstructive surgery oftentimes remains the only curative therapy. Breast cancer (BC), skin cancer (SC), head and neck cancer (HNC), and sarcoma amongst other cancer entities commonly require reconstructive surgery to restore form, aesthetics, and functionality. Understanding the basic principles, strengths, and limitations of mAB and ICI as (neo-) adjuvant therapies and treatment alternatives for resectable or unresectable tumors is paramount for optimized surgical therapy planning. Yet, there is a scarcity of studies that condense the current body of literature on mAB and ICI for BC, SC, HNC, and sarcoma. This knowledge gap may result in suboptimal treatment planning, ultimately impairing patient outcomes. Herein, we aim to summarize the current translational endeavors focusing on mAB and ICI. This line of research may serve as an evidence-based fundament to guide targeted therapy and optimize interdisciplinary anti-cancer strategies