An Initial Strategy of Intensive Medical Therapy Is Comparable to That of Coronary Revascularization for Suppression of Scintigraphic Ischemia in High-Risk But Stable Survivors of Acute Myocardial Infarction

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to determine the relative benefit of intensive medical therapy compared with coronary revascularization for suppressing scintigraphic ischemia.BackgroundAlthough medical therapies can reduce myocardial ischemia and improve patient survival after acute myocardial infarction, the relative benefit of medical therapy versus coronary revascularization for reducing ischemia is unknown.MethodsA prospective randomized trial in 205 stable survivors of acute myocardial infarction was made to define the relative efficacy of an intensive medical therapy strategy versus coronary revascularization for suppressing scintigraphic ischemia as assessed by serial gated adenosine Tc-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion tomography. All patients at baseline had large total (≥20%) and ischemic (≥10%) adenosine-induced left ventricular perfusion defects and an ejection fraction ≥35%. Imaging was performed during 1 to 10 days of hospital admission and repeated in an identical fashion after optimization of therapy. Patients randomized to either strategy had similar baseline demographic and scintigraphic characteristics.ResultsBoth intensive medical therapy and coronary revascularization induced significant but comparable reductions in total (−16.2 ± 10% vs. −17.8 ± 12%; p = NS) and ischemic (−15 ± 9% vs. −16.2 ± 9%; p = NS) perfusion defect sizes. Likewise, a similar percentage of patients randomized to medical therapy versus coronary revascularization had suppression of adenosine-induced ischemia (80% vs. 81%; p = NS).ConclusionsSequential adenosine sestamibi myocardial perfusion tomography can effectively monitor changes in scintigraphic ischemia after anti-ischemic medical or coronary revascularization therapy. A strategy of intensive medical therapy is comparable to coronary revascularization for suppressing ischemia in stable patients after acute infarction who have preserved LV function

Triage of patients for attenuation-corrected stress-first Tc-99m SPECT MPI using a simplified clinical pre-test scoring model.

BACKGROUND: Stress-only Tc-99m SPECT MPI saves time and reduces radiation exposure while a normal study has a benign prognosis. However, no guidelines exist as to which patients should undergo stress-first MPI. The purpose of this study was to validate a previously published pre-test prediction scoring model and refine the stress-first triage process further if possible. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent an attenuation-corrected Tc-99m SPECT MPI over a 39-month period. Based on 17-segment model semi-quantitative scoring, a successful stress-first MPI was defined as a summed stress attenuation-corrected score ≤ 1. Based on results from multivariate analysis, the previously published prediction score (comprised eight clinical and demographic variables) was compared to triage based on coronary artery disease (CAD) status alone and with the addition of other highly associated variables. Logistic regression and Chi-squared analyses were used to determine the magnitude of variable effect and to compare model results. RESULTS: A total of 2,277 patients were included, and the prediction score successfully stratified patients into low-risk (91.1% successful stress-first), intermediate-risk (79.4%), and high-risk (50.7%) groups. Comparing the use of the prediction score to the use of a history of CAD as the only triage factor, 69.0% of patients would be accurately triaged using the prediction score with a cutoff of 7 (maximized sensitivity and specificity), while 78.6% were correctly triaged with CAD status alone (P \u3c .0001). The addition of variables highly associated with a successful stress-first protocol (congestive heart failure [OR 3.4] and an abnormal resting ECG [OR 2.1]) to CAD status further enhanced triage accuracy to 81% (P \u3c .0001). CONCLUSIONS: While the previously described prediction score effectively identifies patients who can successfully undergo stress-first MPI, it is cumbersome. Triaging based solely on CAD status and with the addition of other key variables is practical and provides improved predictive accuracy for successful stress-first MPI. Utilizing this simplified pre-test scoring model may allow for wider adoption of stress-first imaging protocols which have clear advantages over traditional rest-stress protocols