Optimizing patient selection for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Carefully selected patients with resectable and limited colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) can be treated with curative intent by cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS+HIPEC). It remains a serious challenge to weigh the potential survival benefit from this extensive treatment against the risks of substantial treatment−related morbidity, mortality, and potential diminished QoL. We identified some new and promising preoperative factors that can predict postoperative morbidity and survival outcomes after CRS+HIPEC. Performing a diagnostic laparoscopy (DLS) routinely during the preoperative workup for CRS+HIPEC prevents non−therapeutic laparotomies (i.e., open−close procedures). DLS is feasible and safe and we recommend performing this laparoscopic screening in an experienced HIPEC center. The extent of surgery (ES) during cytoreductive surgery is a well−known risk factor for major postoperative morbidity. For the first time, we discovered that experienced HIPEC surgeons in most cases fail to predict the resections that are necessary to achieve a complete cytoreduction, with an underestimation of the ES in almost 40% of the cases. At this moment, two investigations are still ongoing (i.e., SELECT trial and MUSCLE POWER study) to further optimize patient selection for CRS+HIPEC. The SELECT trial aims to improve the staging of colorectal PM during DLS by using the fluorescent tracer bevacizumab−IRDye800CW. The MUSCLE POWER study focusses on (the prevention of) clinically relevant surgery−related muscle loss (SRML) in cancer patients after major abdominal surgery. Ultimately, these new strategies might reduce overtreatment, morbidity, and costs while maintaining the same or better effectiveness with a lower recurrence rate and improved QoL

Surgical techniques for mesenteric lengthening in ileoanal pouch surgery:a systematic review

Aim: The key to successful construction of an ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis is the ability of the pouch reservoir to reach the anus well vascularized and without tension. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of previously described different surgical lengthening techniques to achieve adequate length for a tension-free IPAA. Method: Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. Two reviewers conducted a systematic search with combinations of keywords for the surgical procedure and surgical lengthening techniques. All publications that reported one or more surgical lengthening techniques during IPAA surgery in adult patients were selected, consisting of reviews, cohort studies, case reports, human cadaver studies and expert opinions. The primary outcomes measured were the different surgical lengthening techniques and the step-by-step approach they involve that can be used during surgery to achieve adequate length for an IPAA. Results: Of 1577 records reviewed, 19 articles were included in this systematic review describing at least 1181 patients (i.e. one review, four retrospective studies, five human cadaver studies, two case reports and seven expert opinions). A total of six different surgical lengthening techniques with various subtechniques were found and described, consisting of pouch folding, construction of different types of pouches, stepladder incisions, skeletonization of vessels, division and ligation of mesenteric vessels and using an interposition vein graft. No prospective or randomized controlled trials were performed regarding this topic. Quality assessment showed a medium quality of the included studies. Conclusion: Different surgical lengthening techniques are described in a step-by-step approach to create adequate mesenteric length during IPAA surgery, in patients in whom the ileal pouch cannot reach the dentate line.</p

Surgeons' Ability to Predict the Extent of Surgery Prior to Cytoreductive Surgery With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

Background: The extent of surgery (ES) during cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) is a well-known risk factor for major postoperative morbidity. Interestingly, the reliability of surgeons to predict the ES prior to CRS + HIPEC is unknown. Methods: In this prospective, observational cohort study, five surgeons predicted the ES prior to surgery in all consecutive patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) who were scheduled for CRS + HIPEC between March 2018 and May 2019. After the preoperative work-up for CRS + HIPEC was completed, all surgeons independently predicted, for each individual patient, the resection or preservation of 22 different anatomical structures and the presence of a stoma post-HIPEC according to a standardized ES form. The actual ES during CRS + HIPEC was extracted from the surgical procedure report and compared with the predicted ES. Overall and individual positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) for each anatomical structure were calculated. Results: One hundred and thirty-one ES forms were collected from 32 patients who successfully underwent CRS + HIPEC. The number of resections was predicted correctly 24 times (18.3%), overestimated 57 times (43.5%), and underestimated 50 times (38.2%). Overall PPVs for the different anatomical structures ranged between 33.3 and 87.8%. Overall, NPVs ranged between 54.9 and 100%, and an NPV > 90% was observed for 12 anatomical structures. Conclusions: Experienced surgeons seem to be able to better predict the anatomical structures that remain in situ after CRS + HIPEC, rather than predict the resections that were necessary to achieve a complete cytoreduction

Is surgical subspecialization associated with hand grip strength and manual dexterity?:A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare hand grip strength (HGS) and manual dexterity of academic, subspecialized surgeons. METHODS: A single-center cross-sectional study was performed among 61 surgeons. HGS was analysed with a hand dynamometer and manual dexterity was extensively analysed with a Purdue Pegboard Test. Correlations between HGS and manual dexterity and specific characteristics of the surgeons were analysed using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). RESULTS: HGS and manual dexterity were comparable between surgeons from different specialities. HGS was positively correlated with male gender (r = 0.59, p < 0.001) and hand glove size (r = 0.61, p < 0.001), whereas manual dexterity was negatively correlated with male gender (r = −0.35, p = 0.006), age (r = −0.39, = 0.002), and hand glove size (r = −0.46, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical subspecialization was not correlated with HGS or manual dexterity. Male surgeons have greater HGS, whereas female surgeons have better manual dexterity. Manual dexterity is also correlated with age, showing better scores for younger surgeons

A prospective cohort study evaluating screening and assessment of six modifiable risk factors in HPB cancer patients and compliance to recommended prehabilitation interventions

INTRODUCTION: Despite improvements in perioperative care, major abdominal surgery continues to be associated with significant perioperative morbidity. Accurate preoperative risk stratification and optimisation (prehabilitation) are necessary to reduce perioperative morbidity. This study evaluated the screening and assessment of modifiable risk factors amendable for prehabilitation interventions and measured the patient compliance rate with recommended interventions.METHOD: Between May 2019 and January 2020, patients referred to our hospital for HPB surgery were screened and assessed on six modifiable preoperative risk factors. The risk factors and screening tools used, with cutoff values, included (i) low physical fitness (a 6-min walk test &lt; 82% of patient's calculated norm and/or patient's activity level not meeting the global recommendations on physical activity for health). Patients who were unfit based on the screening were assessed with a cardiopulmonary exercise test (anaerobic threshold ≤ 11 mL/kg/min); (ii) malnutrition (patient-generated subjective global assessment ≥ 4); (iii) iron-deficiency anaemia (haemoglobin &lt; 12 g/dL for women, &lt; 13 g/dL for men and transferrin saturation ≤ 20%); (iv) frailty (Groningen frailty indicator/Robinson frailty score ≥ 4); (v) substance use (smoking and alcohol use of &gt; 5 units per week) and (vi) low psychological resilience (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ≥ 8). Patients had a consultation with the surgeon on the same day as their screening. High-risk patients were referred for necessary interventions.RESULTS: One hundred consecutive patients were screened at our prehabilitation outpatient clinic. The prevalence of high-risk patients per risk factor was 64% for low physical fitness, 42% for malnutrition, 32% for anaemia (in 47% due to iron deficiency), 22% for frailty, 12% for smoking, 18% for alcohol use and 21% for low psychological resilience. Of the 77 patients who were eventually scheduled for surgery, 53 (68.8%) needed at least one intervention, of whom 28 (52.8%) complied with 100% of the necessary interventions. The median (IQR) number of interventions needed in the 77 patients was 1.0 (0-2).CONCLUSION: It is feasible to screen and assess all patients referred for HPB cancer surgery for six modifiable risk factors. Most of the patients had at least one risk factor that could be optimised. However, compliance with the suggested interventions remains challenging.</p

Systematic Review of Factors Affecting Quality of Life After Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

Background: Previous studies have shown that, overall, quality of life (QoL) decreases within the first 3–6 months after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC), returning to baseline levels by 6–12 months. This systematic review aims to evaluate the factors affecting QoL after CRS + HIPEC within 12 months of surgery. Methods: Electronic databases were investigated searching for articles reporting QoL with validated questionnaires up to September 2019. Risk of bias was assessed with the methodological index for non-randomized studies tool. The primary outcomes were short-term (< 6 months after surgery) and medium-term (6–12 months after surgery) determinants of QoL after CRS + HIPEC. Secondary outcomes were QoL and reported symptoms over time. Results: We included 14 studies that used 12 different questionnaires. The reported data were collected prospectively or retrospectively for 1556 patients (dropout < 50% in four studies). Overall, studies showed diminished QoL within 3 months after surgery and a recovery to baseline or greater by 12 months. QoL was negatively influenced by higher age, female sex, prolonged operation time, extensive disease, residual disease, adjuvant chemotherapy, complications, stoma placement, and recurrent disease. QoL results were comparable between studies, with dropout rates above and below 50%. Conclusions: QoL returns to baseline levels within 12 months after CRS + HIPEC provided the disease does not recur, and this recovery process is influenced by several factors

Diagnostic Laparoscopy as a Selection Tool for Patients with Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases to Prevent a Non-therapeutic Laparotomy During Cytoreductive Surgery

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the introduction of diagnostic laparoscopy (DLS) in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) to prevent non-therapeutic laparotomies during cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC). METHODS: Patients with histologically proven colorectal PM who underwent a laparotomy for potential CRS + HIPEC from January 2006 to January 2019 were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database. In 2012, DLS was introduced in the preoperative work-up for CRS + HIPEC in our academic center. The rates of non-therapeutic laparotomies, major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher), and survival outcomes were investigated for patients who underwent a laparotomy before (cohort A) and after (cohort B) the introduction of DLS. In cohort B, the reasons to refrain from DLS were retrospectively explored from medical records. RESULTS: Overall, 172 patients were included [cohort A: 48 patients (27.9%); cohort B: 124 patients (72.1%)]. A significant drop in the rate of non-therapeutic laparotomies occurred in cohort B compared with cohort A (21.0 vs. 35.4%: p = 0.044), despite only 85 patients (68.5%) from cohort B undergoing DLS in our academic center. The most important reason to refrain from DLS was a recently performed DLS or laparotomy in the referring hospital (48.7%). Major postoperative complications, in-hospital mortality, and survival outcomes were similar for both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Performing DLS during the preoperative work-up for CRS + HIPEC prevents non-therapeutic laparotomies in patients with colorectal PM. We recommend performing this laparoscopic screening in an experienced HIPEC center

Actual postoperative protein and calorie intake in patients undergoing major open abdominal cancer surgery:A prospective, observational cohort study

Background Adequate nutritional protein and energy intake are required for optimal postoperative recovery. There are limited studies reporting the actual postoperative protein and energy intake within the first week after major abdominal cancer surgery. The main objective of this study was to quantify the protein and energy intake after major abdominal cancer surgery. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study. Nutrition intake was assessed with a nutrition diary. The amount of protein and energy consumed through oral, enteral, and parenteral nutrition was recorded and calculated separately. Based on the recommendations of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), protein and energy intake were considered insufficient when patients received Fifty patients were enrolled in this study. Mean daily protein and energy intake was 0.61 +/- 0.44 g/kg/day and 9.58 +/- 3.33 kcal/kg/day within the first postoperative week, respectively. Protein and energy intake were insufficient in 45 [90%] and 41 [82%] of the 50 patients, respectively. Patients with Clavien-Dindo grade >= III complications consumed less daily protein compared with the group of patients without complications and patients with grade I or II complications. Conclusion During the first week after major abdominal cancer surgery, the majority of patients do not consume an adequate amount of protein and energy. Incorporating a registered dietitian into postoperative care and adequate nutrition support after major abdominal cancer surgery should be a standard therapeutic goal to improve nutrition intake

Delta peritoneal cancer index (Delta PCI):A new dynamic prognostic parameter for survival in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases

Background: The peritoneal cancer index (PCI) calculated during exploratory laparotomy is a strong prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) who undergo cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC). Progression of the PCI between diagnostic laparoscopy (DLS) and potential CRS + HIPEC (Delta PCI) might be a more dynamic prognostic factor for OS after CRS + HIPEC. Materials and methods: Between 2012 and 2018, all colorectal PM patients who underwent an exploratory laparotomy for potential CRS + HIPEC after DLS were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were divided into stable disease (Delta PCI 0-3), mild progression (Delta PCI 4-9), or severe progression (Delta PCI >= 10). Kaplan-Meier analysis and a multivariate Cox regression were performed. Results: Eighty-four patients (Delta PCI 0-3, n = 35; Delta PCI 4-9, n = 34; and Delta PCI >= 10, n = 15) were analysed. Median OS after CRS + HIPEC was significantly decreased in patients with a Delta PCI of 4-9 (35.1 [95% CI 25.5-44.6]) or Delta PCI >= 10 (24.1 [95% CI 11.7-36.5]) compared to patients with a Delta PCI of 0-3 (47.9 [95% CI 40.0-55.7], p = 0.004). In multivariate regression analysis, Delta PCI remained an independent risk factor for OS: Delta PCI 4-9 HR 3.1 (95% CI 1.4-7.2, p = 0.007) and Delta PCI >= 10 HR 4.4 (95% CI 1.5-13.1, p = 0.007). Conclusion: A high Delta PCI is an independent dynamic prognostic factor for OS and might reflect a more aggressive tumour biology in patients with colorectal PM. HIPEC surgeons should be aware of a high-Delta PCI-associated diminished prognosis and should reconsider CRS + HIPEC when confronted with a Delta PCI >= 10. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO - The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved