14 research outputs found
The Ensemblist Nature of Plant Plurality
A core misconception about plants underlying much of the work in both plant
studies and biology to currently revise it, is the designation of plants as quantifiable
individuals rather than interspecies ensembles. Despite the epigenetics revolution in
biology, ushering in the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, plants and other organisms
nonetheless are often observed as individual specimens with which one can tamper. In
distinction to animals, which are fundamentally self-contained (even if both
exosemiotically and endosemiotically their composition and signals are thoroughgoingly
interspecies and elemental), plants disabuse us of the metaphysics of isolated ontologies
through their radical plurality. In a mature forest, for example, it would be a mistake to
cleanly demarcate where one plant ends and another begins, or were the plant ends and
its fungal symbionts begin. The lessons of semiotic and thus ontological plurality and
porosity plants tender also in fluctuating ways to alter our understanding of human and
animal ontologies as plural
Environmental justice as a (potentially) hegemonic concept
This article explores the need to recognise and compensate the plurality of
environmental justice claims, while paying close attention to the outcomes
of the most marginalised groups – cultura
Notes from the Field: Environmental Contamination from E-cigarette, Cigarette, Cigar, and Cannabis Products at 12 High Schools — San Francisco Bay Area, 2018–2019
I am a Fake Loop: the Effects of Advertising-Based Artificial Selection
Mimicry is common among animals, plants, and other kingdoms of life. Humans in late
capitalism, however, have devised an unique method of mimicking the signs that
trigger evolutionarily-programmed instincts of their own species in order to manipulate
them. Marketing and advertising are the most pervasive and sophisticated forms of
known human mimicry, deliberately hijacking our instincts in order to select on the
basis of one dimension only: profit. But marketing and advertising also strangely
undermine their form of mimicry, deceiving both the intended targets and the signaler
simultaneously. Human forms of mimicry have the regular consequence of deceiving
the imitator, reducing meta-cognitive awareness of the act and intentions surrounding
such deception. Therefore, the deceiver in the end deceives himself as well as intended
targets. Drawing on scholarship applying Niko Tinbergen’s ethological discovery of
supernormal stimuli in animals to humans, this article analyzes sophisticated mass
mimicry in contemporary culture, in both intended and unintended forms
Why every day should be a Sustainability Day
Environmental philosopher Yogi Hendlin calls on students to join the global climate strike and Dutch education strike
Beyond the Brotherhood: Skoal Bandits' role in the evolution of marketing moist smokeless tobacco pouches.
Background: Since 2006, “snus” smokeless tobacco has been sold in the U.S.. However, U.S. Smokeless Tobacco
(USST) and Swedish Match developed and marketed pouched moist snuff tobacco (MST) since 1973.
Methods: Analysis of previously secret tobacco documents, advertisements and trade press.
Results: USST partnered with Swedish Match, forming United Scandia International to develop pouch products as
part of the “Lotus Project.” Pouched MST was not commonly used, either in Sweden or the U.S. prior to the Lotus Project’s
innovation in 1973. The project aimed to transform smokeless tobacco from being perceived as an “unsightly habit of old
men” into a relevant, socially acceptable urban activity, targeting 15–35 year-old men. While USST’s initial pouched product
“Good Luck,” never gained mainstream traction, Skoal Bandits captured significant market share after its 1983 introduction.
Internal market research found that smokers generally used Skoal Bandits in smokefree environments, yet continued to
smoke cigarettes in other contexts. Over time, pouch products increasingly featured increased flavor, size, nicotine strength
and user imagery variation.
Conclusions: Marlboro and Camel Snus advertising mirrors historical advertising for Skoal Bandits, designed to recruit new
users and smokers subjected to smokefree places. Despite serious efforts, pouched MST marketing has been unable to
dispel its association with traditional smokeless tobacco stereotypes as macho and rural. Public education efforts to
discourage new users and dual use of MST and cigarettes should emphasize that “new” pouch products are simply
repackaging “old” smokeless tobacco
The environmental externalities of tobacco manufacturing
Growing research and public awareness of the environmental impacts of tobacco present an opportunity for environmental science and public health to work together. Various United Nations agencies share interests in mitigating the environmental costs of tobacco. Since 2000, transnational tobacco industry consolidation has accelerated, spotlighting the specific companies responsible for the environmental and human harms along the tobacco production chain. Simultaneously, corporate social responsibility norms have led the industry to disclose statistics on the environmental harms their business causes. Yet, independent and consistent reporting remain hurdles to accurately assessing tobacco’s environmental impact. This article is the first to analyze publicly available industry data on tobacco manufacturing pollution. Tobacco’s significant environmental impact suggests this industry should be included in environmental analyses as a driver of environmental degradation influencing climate change. Countries aiming to meet UN Sustainable Development Goals must act to reduce environmental harms caused by the tobacco industry