Addiction as a Disorder of Self-Control

Impairment of self-control is often said to be a defining feature of addiction. Yet many addicts display what appears to be a considerable amount of control over their drug-oriented actions. Not only are their actions clearly intentional and frequently carried out in a conscious and deliberate manner, there is evidence that many addicts are responsive to a wide range of ordinary incentives and counter-incentives. Moreover, addicts have a wide variety of reasons for using drugs, reasons which often seem to go a long way towards explaining their drug-oriented behavior. Many use drugs, for example, to cope with stressful or traumatic experiences. In this article I argue that some standard philosophical explanations of addicts’ impairment of self-control are inadequate, and propose an alternative

Addiction, compulsion, and weakness of the will: A dual process perspective

How should addictive behavior be explained? In terms of neurobiological illness and compulsion, or as a choice made freely, even rationally, in the face of harmful social or psychological circumstances? Some of the disagreement between proponents of the prevailing medical models and choice models in the science of addiction centres on the notion of “loss of control” as a normative characterization of addiction. In this article I examine two of the standard interpretations of loss of control in addiction, one according to which addicts have lost free will, the other according to which their will is weak. I argue that both interpretations are mistaken and propose therefore an alternative based on a dual-process approach. This alternative neither rules out a capacity in addicts to rationally choose to engage in drug-oriented behavior, nor the possibility that addictive behavior can be compulsive and depend upon harmful changes in their brains caused by the regular use of drugs

The first three years of the outburst and light-echo evolution of V838 Mon and the nature of its progenitor

V838 Mon has undergone one of the most mysterious stellar outbursts on record, with (a) a large amplitude (Delta B ~ 10 mag) and multi-maxima photometric pattern, (b) a cool spectral type at maximum becoming cooler and cooler with time during the descent, until it reached the never-seen-before realm of L-type supergiants, never passing through optically thin or nebular stages, (c) the development of a spectacular, monotonically expanding light-echo in the circumstellar material, and (d) the identification of a massive and young B3V companion, unaffected by the outburst. In this talk we review the photometric and spectroscopic evolution during the first three full years of outburst, the light-echo development and infer the nature of the progenitor, which was brighter and hotter in quiescence than the B3V companion and with an inferred ZAMS mass of about 65 Msun.Comment: to appear in the Proceedings of the Colloquium "Interacting Binaries: Accretion, Evolution and Outcome", held in Cefalu' (Sicily) July 4-10, 2004, L.A. Antonelli et al. eds., American Institute of Physics Conf. Proc. series, in press. 6 pages, 4 figure