A Cross-Cultural Study of Physician Treatment Decisions for Demented Nursing Home Patients Who Develop Pneumonia

PURPOSE We wanted to explore factors that influence Dutch and US physician treatment decisions when nursing home patients with dementia become acutely ill with pneumonia

A Cross-Cultural Study of Physician Treatment Decisions for Demented Nursing Home Patients Who Develop Pneumonia

PURPOSE We wanted to explore factors that influence Dutch and US physician treatment decisions when nursing home patients with dementia become acutely ill with pneumonia. METHODS Using a qualitative semistructured interview study design, we collected data from 12 physicians in the Netherlands and 12 physicians in North Carolina who care for nursing home patients. Our main outcome measures were perceptions of influential factors that determine physician treatment decisions regarding care of demented patients who develop pneumonia. RESULTS Several themes emerged from the study. First, physicians viewed their patient care roles differently. Dutch physicians assumed active, primary responsibility for treatment decisions, whereas US physicians were more passive and deferential to family preferences, even in cases when they considered families’ wishes for care as inappropriate. These family wishes were a second theme. US physicians reported a perceived sense of threat from families as influencing the decision to treat more aggressively, whereas Dutch physicians revealed a predisposition to treat based on what they perceived was in the best interest of the patient. The third theme was the process of decision making whereby Dutch physicians based decisions on an intimate knowledge of the patient, and American physicians reported limited knowledge of their nursing home patients as a result of lack of contact time. CONCLUSION Physician-perceived care roles regarding treatment decisions are influenced by contextual differences in physician training and health care delivery in the United States and the Netherlands. These results are relevant to the debate about optimal care for patients with poor quality of life who lack decision-making capacity

Hydroxycarbamide versus chronic transfusion for maintenance of transcranial doppler flow velocities in children with sickle cell anaemia-TCD With Transfusions Changing to Hydroxyurea (TWiTCH): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

For children with sickle cell anaemia and high transcranial doppler (TCD) flow velocities, regular blood transfusions can effectively prevent primary stroke, but must be continued indefinitely. The efficacy of hydroxycarbamide (hydroxyurea) in this setting is unknown; we performed the TWiTCH trial to compare hydroxyurea with standard transfusions. TWiTCH was a multicentre, phase 3, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial done at 26 paediatric hospitals and health centres in the USA and Canada. We enrolled children with sickle cell anaemia who were aged 4-16 years and had abnormal TCD flow velocities (≥ 200 cm/s) but no severe vasculopathy. After screening, eligible participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to continue standard transfusions (standard group) or hydroxycarbamide (alternative group). Randomisation was done at a central site, stratified by site with a block size of four, and an adaptive randomisation scheme was used to balance the covariates of baseline age and TCD velocity. The study was open-label, but TCD examinations were read centrally by observers masked to treatment assignment and previous TCD results. Participants assigned to standard treatment continued to receive monthly transfusions to maintain 30% sickle haemoglobin or lower, while those assigned to the alternative treatment started oral hydroxycarbamide at 20 mg/kg per day, which was escalated to each participant's maximum tolerated dose. The treatment period lasted 24 months from randomisation. The primary study endpoint was the 24 month TCD velocity calculated from a general linear mixed model, with the non-inferiority margin set at 15 cm/s. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population and safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of assigned treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01425307. Between Sept 20, 2011, and April 17, 2013, 159 patients consented and enrolled in TWiTCH. 121 participants passed screening and were then randomly assigned to treatment (61 to transfusions and 60 to hydroxycarbamide). At the first scheduled interim analysis, non-inferiority was shown and the sponsor terminated the study. Final model-based TCD velocities were 143 cm/s (95% CI 140-146) in children who received standard transfusions and 138 cm/s (135-142) in those who received hydroxycarbamide, with a difference of 4·54 (0·10-8·98). Non-inferiority (p=8·82 × 10(-16)) and post-hoc superiority (p=0·023) were met. Of 29 new neurological events adjudicated centrally by masked reviewers, no strokes were identified, but three transient ischaemic attacks occurred in each group. Magnetic resonance brain imaging and angiography (MRI and MRA) at exit showed no new cerebral infarcts in either treatment group, but worsened vasculopathy in one participant who received standard transfusions. 23 severe adverse events in nine (15%) patients were reported for hydroxycarbamide and ten serious adverse events in six (10%) patients were reported for standard transfusions. The most common serious adverse event in both groups was vaso-occlusive pain (11 events in five [8%] patients with hydroxycarbamide and three events in one [2%] patient for transfusions). For high-risk children with sickle cell anaemia and abnormal TCD velocities who have received at least 1 year of transfusions, and have no MRA-defined severe vasculopathy, hydroxycarbamide treatment can substitute for chronic transfusions to maintain TCD velocities and help to prevent primary stroke. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health

TCD with Transfusions Changing to Hydroxyurea (TWiTCH): Hydroxyurea Therapy As an Alternative to Transfusions for Primary Stroke Prevention in Children with Sickle Cell Anemia

Abstract Transcranial Doppler (TCD) screening in children with sickle cell anemia (SCA) identifies abnormally elevated cerebral artery flow velocities that confer an elevated risk for primary stroke. Chronic transfusions offer effective stroke prophylaxis in this setting, but must be continued indefinitely and lead to transfusional iron overload. An alternative treatment strategy that offers similar effective protection against primary stroke, and provides control of iron overload, is needed. TCD With Transfusions Changing to Hydroxyurea (TWiTCH, NCT01425307) was an NHLBI-funded Phase III multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing 24-months of standard treatment (transfusions) to alternative treatment (hydroxyurea) in children with SCA and abnormal TCD velocities. All eligible children had received at least 12 months of transfusions. TWiTCH had a non-inferiority trial design; the primary study endpoint was the 24-month TCD velocity obtained from a linear mixed model, controlling for baseline (enrollment) values, with a non-inferiority margin of 15 cm/sec. The transfusion arm maintained children at HbS 240 cm/sec. Exit brain MRI/MRA exams documented no new parenchymal abnormalities but one child (transfusion arm) developed new vasculopathy. Sickle cell related serious adverse events were more common in the hydroxyurea arm than the transfusion arm (23 to 15), but none was related to study treatment or study procedures. Iron overload improved more in the hydroxyurea arm than in the transfusion arm, with a greater average change in serum ferritin (-1085 compared to -38 ng/mL, p<0.001) and LIC (average -1.9 compared to +2.4 mg/g dry weight liver, p=0.001). In the multicenter Phase III TWiTCH trial, which treated children with SCA and abnormal TCD velocities but without severe MRA vasculopathy, hydroxyurea at MTD was non-inferior and possibly superior to chronic transfusions for maintaining TCD velocities. Serial phlebotomy effectively managed iron overload. Hydroxyurea may represent an effective alternative to indefinite transfusions for the prevention of primary stroke in this high risk population. Disclosures Ware: Eli Lilly: Other: DSMB membership; Bayer Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Biomedomics: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Hydroxyurea for children with SCA. Owen:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Rogers:BioRad Labs: Consultancy; Apopharma: Consultancy; Baxter: Consultancy; Glaxo Smith Kline: Consultancy. Kwiatkowski:Shire Pharmaceuticals and Sideris Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Sideris Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; ISIS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Heeney:Sancillio: Consultancy; Eli Lilly: Research Funding. Nottage:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Cohen:Novartis: Consultancy; ApoPharma: Other: DSMB member