41 research outputs found

    The Genesis stent: A new low-profile stent for use in infants, children, and adults with congenital heart disease

    Full text link
    Placement of intravascular stents that can reach adult size in infants and smaller children has been limited by the large profile and poor flexibility of currently available stents. In vitro and in vivo testing of the Genesis stent was performed to evaluate crimpability, predeployment flexibility, and radial strength. Comparisons were made to the Palmaz iliac and IntraStent (IS) LD stents. Nine physicians placed 30 Genesis stents in swine pulmonary and systemic arteries to evaluate stent deliverability/crimpability. Two swine were recovered and underwent a second catheterization 8 weeks later, where the stents (n = 8) were reexpanded to maximal size. Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) assessments were performed. In vitro testing revealed the Genesis stent to have superior crimpability, flexibility, and comparable radial strength to the Palmaz iliac stent, and superior crimpability and radial strength and comparable flexibility to the IS LD series. During in vivo testing, the physicians graded the Genesis stent superior to the Palmaz stent regarding crimpability and deliverability, and superior to the IS LD stent in regard to crimpability, and comparable to or superior in deliverability. In the chronic animals, the Genesis stent was expanded up to maximal diameter 8 weeks following implantation. Angiographic and IVUS revealed no fractures no in-stent restenosis. The Genesis stent can be easily delivered through smaller sheaths, which will facilitate their use in infants and smaller children with vascular stenosis. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2003;59:406–414. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/35255/1/10547_ftp.pd

    Intermediate follow-up following intravascular stenting for treatment of coarctation of the aorta

    Full text link
    Background : We report a multiinstitutional study on intermediate-term outcome of intravascular stenting for treatment of coarctation of the aorta using integrated arch imaging (IAI) techniques. Methods and Results : Medical records of 578 patients from 17 institutions were reviewed. A total of 588 procedures were performed between May 1989 and Aug 2005. About 27% (160/588) procedures were followed up by further IAI of their aorta (MRI/CT/repeat cardiac catheterization) after initial stent procedures. Abnormal imaging studies included: the presence of dissection or aneurysm formation, stent fracture, or the presence of reobstruction within the stent (instent restenosis or significant intimal build-up within the stent). Forty-one abnormal imaging studies were reported in the intermediate follow-up at median 12 months (0.5–92 months). Smaller postintervention of the aorta (CoA) diameter and an increased persistent systolic pressure gradient were associated with encountering abnormal follow-up imaging studies. Aortic wall abnormalities included dissections ( n = 5) and aneurysm ( n = 13). The risk of encountering aortic wall abnormalities increased with larger percent increase in CoA diameter poststent implant, increasing balloon/coarc ratio, and performing prestent angioplasty. Stent restenosis was observed in 5/6 parts encountering stent fracture and neointimal buildup ( n = 16). Small CoA diameter poststent implant and increased poststent residual pressure gradient increased the likelihood of encountering instent restenosis at intermediate follow-up. Conclusions : Abnormalities were observed at intermediate follow-up following IS placement for treatment of native and recurrent coarctation of the aorta. Not exceeding a balloon:coarctation ratio of 3.5 and avoidance of prestent angioplasty decreased the likelihood of encountering an abnormal follow-up imaging study in patients undergoing intravascular stent placement for the treatment of coarctation of the aorta. We recommend IAI for all patients undergoing IS placement for treatment of CoA. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/57392/1/21191_ftp.pd
    corecore